The Forum > General Discussion > Introducing Friendly Jordies
Introducing Friendly Jordies
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
Posted by mhaze, Monday, 25 November 2019 12:20:09 PM
| |
Dear mhaze,
You really are a slippery dick aren't you. Friendly Jordies lists 7 sources for his figures. You list zero. Your form in this regard is an absolute disgrace. Out of around 30 plus ten year periods over the ice record you picked the only one you could find to show a 'increase' in ice extent in the Arctic. Now you waltz in here with a bunch of unsubstantiated figures and proclaim his are crap. Absolute bulldust. Now how about you at least do the bare minimum and stump up with at least a single source, or is even that beyond you. Posted by SteeleRedux, Monday, 25 November 2019 6:00:14 PM
| |
Dear Hasbeen,
How's it going old cock? Good? Puerile? Mate, the way you behave on this forum is the very epitome of puerile. Always attacking the messenger never the message. That is bloody kindergarten stuff and it always has been. How about tackling just one of his arguments. At least mhaze had a go albeit lambfistedly. Give it a crack for once. Posted by SteeleRedux, Monday, 25 November 2019 6:07:28 PM
| |
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/liberal-fever-swamps/530736/
Posted by individual, Monday, 25 November 2019 7:12:46 PM
| |
OH dear SR,
Still whining about being outed (or was 'outliered') on the Arctic issue. You need to chill out on the Arctic. http://www.rfs.nsw.gov.au/resources/publications/annual-reports individual, Yes I remember that article. It caused quite the ruckus at the time (2017). The scary part is that the 2019 version of these folk make the 2017 version seem almost sane. Posted by mhaze, Tuesday, 26 November 2019 7:33:59 AM
| |
A RFS volunteer has been charged with lighting 7 fires in the Bega Valley. Barnyard Joy should be able to tell us if he voted National, like that farmer who also started a fire. Come on Barnyard give us one of your rants denigrating RFS volunteers and farmers for lighting fires.
Posted by Paul1405, Wednesday, 27 November 2019 12:24:20 PM
|
That the chap was either lying or terribly ill-informed as regards his data is easily demonstrated.
Yet because he's saying what they want to hear, being demonstrably wrong is just ignored.
We see this so often in so many areas of contention that one wonders if they are living in an alternate reality.
I'm not sure if its a good thing or not. One would hope and expect that, ultimately, those views based on the facts would prevail. But perhaps we are so far down the post-modern road that the opposite is the case