The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Climate Emergency

Climate Emergency

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 76
  7. 77
  8. 78
  9. Page 79
  10. 80
  11. 81
  12. 82
  13. ...
  14. 114
  15. 115
  16. 116
  17. All
Climate science simple enough, those telling me it is not taking place, is a fraud seem unable to tell me who bluffed me and why
NOT NOW SOON excels in changing the subject
I want to honestly know who conned me and why?
How do my detractors answer my questions about apparent evidence the climate has changed and continues to
Not hard
If you are convinced then tell us why
Posted by Belly, Monday, 2 December 2019 3:08:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Sounds like Shadow Minister will be happy to see the rest of the country sold off to China and for people to stop criticising AGW denialists. With people like this in the world what hope do future generations have! I wonder how much he is stuffing into his pockets from selling real estate to cashed up Chinese migrants. I wonder how much he gets each year in franking credits from coal mining shares.
Posted by Mr Opinion, Monday, 2 December 2019 6:00:07 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
NOT NOW SOON,
there are too many things on your link to reply to each one, but one of them is CORRECT! The 1988 Hansen piece advises about what life might be like in 2050! Um, how is this retarded website you linked to 'debunking' something that's still 30 years away!

Ha ha ha ha, oh dude! Watch your sources!

OK, another subject. Perhaps they were trying to use Hansen to contradict those climate scientists that predicted an ice age, and make the whole discipline look silly. Here's the thing: the majority of ice-age-cometh hype was from the media, not the scientists.

"A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that few papers predicted global cooling (7 in total). Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming (Peterson 2008). The large majority of climate research in the 1970s predicted the Earth would warm as a consequence of CO2. Rather than 1970s scientists predicting cooling, the opposite is the case."
http://skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predictions-in-1970s.htm
Posted by Max Green, Monday, 2 December 2019 6:13:05 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
As we should all be doing our bit to reduce pollution, should the various Governments cancel their annual New Years Day fireworks pollution?
Posted by Is Mise, Monday, 2 December 2019 7:24:52 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Meh! Maybe if they pose a fire threat, but it depends what you mean by pollution. Do fireworks trap an estimated 4 Hiroshima bombs per second heat? I didn't think so. It's one night. Burning coal and oil and gas kills tens of thousands of Australians every year, 3 million people worldwide, and doubles the bill of the electricity cost. Oh, and one day fossil fuels will peak and go into decline. They're finite. Don't you think we should wean off them before they leave us anyway?
Posted by Max Green, Monday, 2 December 2019 7:32:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Max Green,

Surprise, surprise! Oil production peaked several years ago. Which is one of the reasons the 21st century is being called the century of gas.

Did you know that every day of burning fossil fuels is equal to about 12 years of accumulated sunlight stored by plants and animals of the Carboniferous period?

I assume it has occurred to you that the denialists are people making money out of the fossil fuel industry. There is a rationale behind their beliefs and actions. For them it's all about greed and self-interest.
Posted by Mr Opinion, Monday, 2 December 2019 7:47:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 76
  7. 77
  8. 78
  9. Page 79
  10. 80
  11. 81
  12. 82
  13. ...
  14. 114
  15. 115
  16. 116
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy