Belly,
You often use the word TRUTH, so why not face the truth now and admit the muslims will never fit into our society and should not be allowed in. They have been a pain to us ever since Fraser allowed them in. In my view equally as bad as the Labor governments welcome mat. Morison was a good immigration minister but now has gone all soft and multicultural. The importation of these no hopers that desire to destroy our country is a direct result of the multicultural policy. Any fool can see they are pioneers for Islam and they make no secret of that.

Belly why not acknowledge the obvious TRUTH.

Henry L hold your breath, stamp your feet, even scream at me if it helps
This much I agree with, the use of the term *multi culture* in stead of *integration* is blindingly stupid
And yes SOME MUSLIMS should never have come here,every one involved in this for a start
But this seems to be a Social experiment, aimed at one day enforcing one world on us
If so it will be no Socialist driven thing but a wealth holders group plan
Well reported, not hidden as you claim, these things need to serve time in prison then be sent back
Until people of any faith can no longer force a growing group who understand *No God ever existed* to give them respect the world will never be one

Hey Belly,
"AGAIN! AC you too try to hide the truth and in doing so rev up anti Muslim feelings
The thing got page one headlines"

Stay calm.

1. I was the first person to add links to the story on this thread;
- dated months back, so I know there was not a specific media blackout;

- Such as a D-notice in the UK.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DSMA-Notice#Australia

Check it, I added the links.

I'm not trying to hide the truth Belly
I'm more about the other side - exposing it.

Stop trying to frame everything around your own brainwashed PC ideology.
My point had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with 'revving up anti-muslim feelings'.
If you consider that it does, then obviously that's just how you perceive it because in my mind there was no malice and it was unintentional;

My point was about PC culture having a 'type of set of rules' that says 'this issue is a divisive one and goes against the narrative of the '2030' future were trying to build', whilst the other is a social justice issue which needs to be highlighted in order to promote the narrative of the '2030' future we're trying to build .

And that exposes a problem in an of itself, that you jumped on the useful idiot PC bandwagon, called me out with PC brainwashing ideology, and missed he point that I ACTUALLY tried to make.