The Forum > General Discussion > 'No gay gene.' Does new study have faults or hold merit?
'No gay gene.' Does new study have faults or hold merit?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Page 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- ...
- 29
- 30
- 31
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I'm not sure you are aware of this story;
"When Peter was seven, he and his younger sister were abducted and sexually abused for days before being released. He was abducted again at 11, this time with his older brother, and taken advantage of by a paedophile gang for several days before they escaped. Later, he was again molested by another man. This abuse led to a profound sense of self-loathing, fear, and uncertainty in Peter, magnified by his family’s rootless lifestyle as they spent his childhood travelling around Australia in a station wagon."
http://www.adefenceofthebible.com/2017/05/23/peter-brocklehurst/
So was the person who first abducted Peter and his sister a homosexual incapable of attraction to the opposite sex or a heterosexual incapable of attraction to the same sex? If so why were both brother and sister raped for days by this man? Or could it be that some people who find themselves in positions of power and control over children are sexually aroused by the feeling of dominance over another human being?
Dear Foxy,
I naturally agree. Thankfully attitudes are changing for the better, in my opinion at least.