The Forum > General Discussion > 'No gay gene.' Does new study have faults or hold merit?
'No gay gene.' Does new study have faults or hold merit?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Page 31
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
thank you, finally a clear and educated pragmatic and reasoned explanation which clarifies further the arguments about whether queers are 'normal' or not.
I am glad you clarified the distinction between the humans and the animals, because the original analogy being pushed by the 'fore' camp, did not sit well with me.
And as a rule, if something does not sit well, then it is not fully accepted and only gives rise to more questions, so.
Thank you.