Hi SR,

Is that it ? " ..... "half-degree warming over the past eighty years, and the inch-rise in sea-level over about the same period." ?

Surely increases have been higher ? Surely we're not supposed to be wetting ourselves over such bugger-all increases ? All those kids weeping in terror at the cataclysm about to overcome the plant ?

FFS. Tell me it isn't so, SR.

Joe

Dear Loudmouth,

I don't know the current amounts because you seemed so sure of your own figures I felt I didn't need to look. Are you saying they were not correct? That you gave us erroneous numbers? How dare you.

Anyway the “bugger all increases” as you disparagingly call them are in lock step with climate models showing trajectories which are very concerning.

Are you another one of those who wouldn't believe a large meteor was going to hit the earth unless you could see it with your own eyes?

The further away it is the less involved in making it miss but the deniers would have us wait until they can look up and see the thing with a naked eye. You appear to have just that mindset. How intelligent is such a outlook?

yep thanks to coal and mining Steelie lives a much more privileged life with a longer expectancy and much comfort. Sounds like those selfish brat kids who despise their parents after having a golden spoon in their mouth. Will be the first to throw tantrum when he can't have reliable power and the fruit of mining. Go figure.

It was "half-degree warming over the past eighty years, and the inch-rise in sea-level over about the same period".
SteeleRedux,
Have these claims actually been verified as to their accuracy ? Just because some "scientists" say so doesn't necessarily make it so. We must not forget that this is mere guessing. What is the benchmark for these "measurements" ?
I have said before that the total shipping, land reclaiming & sediment displacement surely adds to some rise in sea level IF Sea level can indeed be measured so accurately !
As you can see it's actually rather easy being a Climateer when there's nothing stable to compare it with to prove/disprove !

Dear individual,

You asked "Have these claims actually been verified as to their accuracy ?"

You will have to ask Loudmouth about the figures, he was the one who spouted them.

For those who are climate change campaigners here is a link for a pro/con debate on climate change science.

http://climatechange.procon.org/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIpKza45vD5AIViMDACh36NQoCEAMYASAAEgIyF_D_BwE#arguments

It's not about politics. It's about if any of the climate science stuff has any reliability. That goes into the science of it all, as well as the observations of their predictions to see if they're reliable or BS. As of now, all of climate science as a field of study seems more like a cushy industry and corrupt academics combined. There are ways to be an enviomentalist and working to reducing pollution, without lying about the fate of the world with all of the global warming doom and gloom crap.

Look it up. There is more there then you guys are recognizing, and likely your blinding yourselves from even looking at the issue because you've made it into a political issue instead of a science issue to be validated and measured.