Perhaps these poor souls would be uplifted if they took a break from their incestuous fear-mongering isolation from reality and noted that nothing that they have been threatening us with has actually happened.

Indeed, in the last 25 years more than a billion people have escaped poverty. Since the 1960s, life expectancy has increased by 6%. Grain production is at record levels. CO2 emissions are responsible for that, as they are responsible for the greening of the globe. Extreme weather has not increased - even the IPCC attests to this.

A 2019 study shows that sea level rises have not increased significantly in 120 years (notrickszone.com).

Every time the 10-12 year 'before it's too late' period ends, another 10-12 year period begins. They are really treating people with contempt, thinking that they can get away with nonsense like that.

To add insult to injury, one of these "weepniks" in America has the gall to complain that there are not enough jobs (for climate bandits) and not enough grants. Ye Gods! Up to 2014 the U.S had shelled out $US166 Billion on climate change. The IPCC is gagging for another US$2.4 Trillion of other people's money before 2035.

Perhaps the fast-coming economic downturn could be a blessing in disguise - casting these parasites off the teat.

I guess if I had spent a decade or two trying to use the scam of global warming to promote the disgusting UN to one world socialist government, & I saw more & more evidence proofing it to be a scam, I'd be crying too.

If we go much further with unreliable power generation the blackouts will start, & that will quickly end the scammers pitch. They know it, hence their frenzy to try to get control before their sh1t hits the fan, & it's all over.

The real joke will be the solar cooling coming to make a mockery of the garbage SR calls science.

Dear Not_Now.Soon,

You write;

“When the data doesn't match reality, then one of 2 things can be said. 1) the data was wrong or the conclusions were in error, (a misunderstanding on the scientists part). Or 2) the data was based on lies. I honestly think it's a combination of the two regarding global warming and the doom and gloom narrative.”

Have you been living under a rock? Both the father of global warming Hansen and the IPCC reports have been consistently on the money about the temperature increases.

http://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warming

Perhaps I have misunderstood you but on the face of it you are being idiotic again.

Dear SteeleRedux,

May I suggest you refer him to the article below cited by Bazz.

Cook, J., et al. 'Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature', Environmental Research Letters 8 (2), 2013.

If you can't trust Bazz then in God's name who can you trust?

To SteeleRedux.

Past predictions have not occured though. Costal cities have not been swallowed up by the ocean yet. Oceanic life has not lost so much life and diversity due to rising tempatures. (Over fishing, hunting, and trash on the other had have a much greater effect in marine wildlife then a rise in tempatures shows to have). Heavy I think I've been told the fate of the Great Barrier Reef sometime ago and no signs of that actually occurring.

The current data of slight tempatures increases as far as I can tell could just be a phase, and the earth will cool later. Either way though the doom and gloom pridictions have not occurred.

No one even needs to look at current forecasts of tempatures changes and where they actually measured up to see that the conclusions of those predictions have been in error for years. The article you posted downplays it. Saying that some pridictions were higher or lower then the actual tempatures increase but still patting themselves on the back that the tempatures are rising. Ignoring the fierce fear based warnings we've been getting (for decades) from climate scientist's conclusions. All of those have been wrong.

I hope that clears up any confusion on what I'm saying.

Wait no. There's one more point. Whether climate scientists are misinformed or actively lying. I said I think it's a combination of the two. Younger college students go into climate change studies with the drive to make a difference. Hear the warnings from their peers and see some data convince them that those warnings are truthful, but are still to young to realize that these warnings have been past their expiration date several times already. So at least in the beginning of a climate scientist's career they are proplem honest in their figures and data. As years go by and the predictions fail to measure up, I think it is likely that many climate scientists will at that point lie on future data they produce, for no other reason to uphold their life's work and to not make it seem like a waste of time, money or grants.