Dear Loudmouth,

Someone has to point out exactly what a bunch of know-all-know-nothing wannabes you GW denialists are. And as an environmental sociologist I am ideally placed for that task.

Joe,

You are just teasing a callow youth. You know there is no evidence; there is, in fact, evidence to the contrary.

The little lad is a totalitarian in the making. He diagnosed me as being 'disturbed', now he accuses individual of 'losing his marbles'.

He is too ignorant of course to know about the many people the Communists locked up in insane asylums when they they questioned the dictators, but he has an instinct for it.

There is not much we can do about the kiddies of today. They have to learn the hard way. Many of them fizzle out. Many of them hit the grog a other drugs, and some will end up in the institutions they think we should be in because they can't deal with the real world.

Dear ttbn,

Spoken like a true LNP diehard. Tony Abbott and Barnaby Joyce would be proud of you.

'Spoken like a true LNP diehard. Tony Abbott and Barnaby Joyce would be proud of you.'

certainly better than having Jeremy Corbyn or Justin Trudeau proud of you.

Yes, runner; an certainly better than being on the same side as Sonny Jim.

SR,

Nowhere did I say the article only mention one prediction.

But it analysed just one prediction from Hanson to try to show how good it was compared to models. It didn't analyse any of the other prediction. As I said, a policy designed to fool those who want to be fooled.

I notice that you've now retreated from the silly claim that the "predictions made in the past about the temperature arc have been spot on" following my providing but a few of the many available examples of the exact opposite.

Perhaps an apology to NNS might be in order.

Oh wait, I forgot who I was talking too....never mind.