The Forum > General Discussion > Death Penalty - Should this ultimate punishment be revisited for certain atrocious crime(s)?
Death Penalty - Should this ultimate punishment be revisited for certain atrocious crime(s)?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Page 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- ...
- 28
- 29
- 30
-
- All
She doesn't like something or someone, then they are immediately guilty, because she says so.
No, it's not acceptable to be accused by someone with an axe to grind.
An intelligent and fair minded, mature person would expect proof and truth, no less.
This BS of a typically weak Aussie govt is not justice, but further evidence where they will kowtow to the pathetic minorities for the sake of votes.
If females conducted themselves in a more mature and chaste manner, we would not see innocent people being wrongfully charged, in cases of a sexual nature.
Other more aggressive sexual encounters would be easy to prove, by the wounds inflected by the aggressor.
If the woman does not come forth immediately and report her encounter, then she is not convinced of her innocence and culpability in the event, therefore the longer she leaves it, the greater the loss of credibility on her part.
This law, like so many in this shitehouse country, further exacerbate an already biased legal system.
Biased against the consumer, and I have witnessed it, so can confirm.
These latest people incarcerated by this stupid rancid law are "historical", meaning they were alleged to have happened decades ago.
It is a bad enough that the accused may or may not have done what they are accused of, but to come forward after so long is just idiotic.
In any event the punishment was way over the top, only because it was politically advantageous to come down hard on these people, NOT because it was as serious an event as the bleeding hearts would want us to believe.