The increasingly deranged Paul now seems to want to drudge up any prominent paedophile he can find, label said person a conservative icon (with zero evidence) and mock his opponents for supporting someone who hasn't actually received any support on these pages.

Well here's a few more names for him to ponder:

Milton Orkopoulos
Keith Wright
Bill D'Arcy
Bernard Finnigan

All convict on child sex and/or child porn offences.
All politicians.
All from the ALP!!

Gee, I wonder why the terms of reference for the Royal Commission were so carefully set so as to ensure political parties weren't examined?

mhaze,

If all that mob you mention above are in the slammer (like Pell), after due process of law (like Pell), I don't have a problem. Do you? Pell didn't even use the Rolf defence; "I can play the wobble board while singing silly ditties", it didn't work all that well for Rolf, maybe George would have had a better result.

The increasingly deranged Paul
How dare you Paul!
Have a different opinion
Please leave your brain in the bucket art the door
Then mindlessly post only M Hazes opinions

Belly,

"Convicted Pedophile in a Church that has great numbers under investigation or in prison end story"

Don't end the story until you examine all the atheist paedophiles.

Hi there STEELEREDUX...

Apologies for not responding to your comprehensive answers, apropos Scottish Criminal Law verdicts. That are currently available to Juries in that jurisdiction. Like many, I grew up with the two verdict system, that we've inherited from Great Britain. A system that seemingly, has previously served us reasonably well. However, over the years, I and many of my former colleagues, have lamented the fact a third option was not available to Juries sitting on Criminal matters in NSW, in fact, all jurisdictions in Australia. That of 'Not proven,' as it is in Scotland.

Moreover, I was heartened to see, that you, 'seemed' to be of a similar mind, especially in some of the more complicated legal cases? I might cite the Victorian, Jadian (sic) LESKIE case, where the accused person was acquitted of Murder. And the Detective I/C of the investigation, as he was leaving the precincts of the Court, was asked by a journo., what further lines of inquiry they may now follow, having regard to that acquittal. He replied, no further inquiries will be made? Implying the investigation had concluded, therefore the matter would soon be filed, as an NFETO (No Further Evidence To Offer).

Howdy Issy,

Just knock up here, that list of all those atheist paedophiles, I don't doubt such a list exists, but I can't find it.

I'll get in early, how ya going with that list Issy.