Dear Hasbeen,

How's it going old cock?

Lol. It looks like your Christmas came early this year didn't it. Santa's present was a cold front. Luckily for us you will have taken your repeatedly offered advice and not taken a single weather event as evidence of anything to do with climate.

I mean it would be the height of hypocrisy for you to claim this is anything but an aberration.

'Snowfall will be a very rare and exciting event. '

the alarmist spokeman writes

'Luckily for us you will have taken your repeatedly offered advice and not taken a single weather event as evidence of anything to do with climate.'

just happens snow continues to fall every year. Sometime a lot, sometimes less. Its been 18 years since the soothsayers prediction. The alarmist just can't win. They just continue their lies and misrepresentations. Now they want to move on to eating meat. What atrocious 'science'.

runner,

If you have any evidence to disprove the science
why don't you present it here.

In the meantime this link may help:

http://climate.nasa/gov/evidence/

Dear runner,

As mean global temperatures and atmospheric CO2 levels keep rising the credibility of you denialists keeps on diminishing. As the planet becomes hotter and the climate becomes more unpredictable and erratic you denialists will fade into insignificance. How do you like the math on that?

runner,

Sorry for the typo.

Here's the link again:

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

"Scientists are united in their findings."

Its simply untrue. There are any number of scientists who don't accept the AGW theory. In another thread here, I showed a group of scientists who have a theory that the climate changes are caused by the strength or lack thereof of solar winds. Hundreds of papers are published yearly that disagree with or heavily limit the extent of AGW.

But the media, particularly the media that the many here read, are united in spreading the myth that the scientists are united.

"And NASA data comes from its various satellites
flying around the globe."

You'd think so wouldn't you. But in fact no. NASA's SST data comes from ground stations. The satellite data is provided by groups other than NASA. Why? Well a cynic might opine that NASA prefers data other than the satellite data because the satellite data constantly shows less warming and those at GISS don't want that, and they definitely don't want it publicised.