I want to highlight this thread comes from someone who ,constantly, tells us both sides of politics are unfit
Then am I far wrong in thinking the poster is from the far right
Australia is not about bigotry
Not about extremes, Morrison has done what the world community has called on all nations with people in those camps to do
Morrison, in my view, will try to empty offshore detention camps
He may even propose we take 4.000 long term refugees from Malaysia, in exchange for all on offshore detention here
Saving billions over time and in no way relaxing current policies

Belly, are you saying Morrison will rebirth Gillard's Malaysian solution. Sadly he hasn't 't the guts to do that. They need to add Indonesia to the pool, Problem solved overnight.

Flo I wish I was, but my post explained it would be only to empty the camps,
We could then keep them empty
Morrison is no mate of mine, but he is shify, he will find a way to empty the camps
Labor must not go in to another election ignoring even its own voters vote against it on this issue
In fact the only two reasons we do not have the Malaysian solution in place is
the GREENS again, voted with Conservatives
And Conservatives value the anti refugee vote too much to give it up

And Conservatives value the anti refugee vote too much to give it up.

Well, the pro-refugee vote is something Labor values highly enough to perpetuate the problem at our peril. Why is this a problem ? Because none of the immature gits have bothered to learn about the difference between refugees & silent invaders !

"Because none of the immature gits have bothered to learn about the difference between refugees & silent invaders !"

individual,

It is likely that they do know. Creating division in society is quite deliberate. Those responsible are not fussed about whether we are invaded by legals or illegals.

This is not a black and white issue. At least not in my opinion. The issue of what is right then comes to the second question of "how do you make it work." The second issue of follow through is worth mentioning because just accepting children of terrorist back without anything else to help the situation will invite most of them to return to the ideologies they came from, or sponsor other issues regardless of ideology because of the hardship they came from. Do you invite children back only to passively watch them grow into gang members and criminals because you weren't there for them after you welcomed them back? Or do you acknowledge that you want no part of this and no added responsibility to help the troubled kids of terrorists?

If there's no follow through to help the situation then all it is is inviting disaster and hoping the investment of danger doesn't come.

That said the part about what is right is easy. "And one who accepts a child on my behalf accepts me and the one who sent me." Jesus said this, and this should be the challenge we hold ourselves to. How to live up to this standard and help the kids and youth of the poor, the criminal, the orphaned and those with struggling parents or those fighting disease and medical issues. Terrorist children would fit into this challenge as well. (I'm not saying to accept children on the condition of making them Christian, but instead to bring them in because of their need. Just putting that out there before anyone confuses the matter).

(Continued)