SM, relax it's not you who needs to clarify anything.
Foxy has a habit of 'hit and run', as she has already warned you, she 'has no wish to argue with you'.
Boy talk about pre-emptive.
I must have missed the part where you said you were going to argue with her.
Don't worry, she has a habit of choosing 'convenient' stories and articles that just happen to suite her agenda.
Taking this last pearler of a link for example.
She would have us believe the message this judge is sending.
Firstly, a judge is not supposed to comment on the vagaries of the media.
Especially as general comment, thereby engaging in the very issue he is warning people off.
The media saying something is expected and it is taken one way or another.
A judge saying something, is percieved as gospel.
Because he was not presiding over a case involving these blacks at the time he made these statements, it was totally in-appropriate to make these comments, because they were a 'personal' opinion.
Need I remind some that judges are people and they suffer from 'bad hair days' like everyone else.
This is the reason why we have things like jurys.
The jury was one of the corner stones of the courts and still to this day.
So a judges personal opinion about a general topic in the public arena is, at the very least, irrelevant.
No one is obligated to listen to someone who happens to be a judge giving personal opinions.
SM, I'm not sure which part of what you said, gave a 'false impression', because that is Foxys domain.
She's at it again.
You gave numbers and explanations, which do not need clarification.
Unlike her link which does.
The link is ambiguous at best, as it does not highlight clearly and in more detail, the different groups being assessed

Foxy,

The quote was raw data. I don't need to massage it.

objecting to about the Fact-Check information.

Are these sources reliable ? After all, they're mostly just academic !

Foxy forgive me
Purely by accident I read line one of an ALTRAV post
Never Do that there days, but he was insulting you from within his glass house
In my defense it was that that kept me reading, for a microsecond

Dear Belly,

Thanks for that.

Some people just don't get the facts and explanations being
presented to them. Statistics do need clarification and
explanation. especially if they are raw data.

I would have thought that Shadow Minister would have
understood my point. I was not looking for an argument with him
and my only reason for not continuing further with the
discussion now - is when I see there's no further point to it
as nothing productive is going to be achieved.

As for ALTRAV? Well, best not to comment too much.
Suffice to say that -
The man is
compulsive and can't help himself. Like playing
chess with a pigeon. Craps all over the board, knocks
over the pieces, and flies
off to his flock claiming victory. (smile).

Again, Thanks.

Foxy, you just did it again, by claiming you know what your talking about and having assessed the situation, then proceeded to finish with a miss informed misleading conclusion.
You even fail at mocking me.
Oh you're too easy, or you've lost your touch, either way, there is no challenge in jousting with you, why are you making it so easy for me.
Pigeons, playing chess, crapping on boards.
Really, Foxy, come on you can do better than that.
If I am right and I'm making you uncomfortable, then just tell me to get stuffed, but you know I'm right, so I guess, as you say, we'll just leave it at that.