The Forum > General Discussion > Israel Folau
Israel Folau
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Page 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- ...
- 20
- 21
- 22
-
- All
Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 17 April 2019 7:29:05 AM
| |
Folau looks to be fighting his sacking on revelations that RA did not include in his contract anything about what he could or couldn't say on social media.
Posted by ttbn, Wednesday, 17 April 2019 11:35:32 AM
| |
By signing and accepting the $4 million that
Israel Folau did, part of the contract was - not putting anything on social media that may potentially offend. 12 months ago he was hauled in and told, "Please do not do that again." And he agreed not to. 12 months later he's done it again. Rugby Australia has decided that under their own codes this is not acceptable behaviour. And as Rugby Chief Castle explains - "He's not being punished for his religious beliefs." "This is not a religious discussion, this is a discussion around the employee - employer relationship and the values and contractual arrangements within that agreement - that's the basis on which we've served him a breach notice." http://www.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-union/folau-ignored-my-warning-says-rugby-australia-chief-castle-20190415-p51ee3.html Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 17 April 2019 12:06:32 PM
| |
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-17/israel-folau-challenges-rugby-australia-breach-notice/11025196
Pay the mans contract out in full or know dropping him is a breech of his rights to think and say what he wants to Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 17 April 2019 4:22:08 PM
| |
QaA was informative for me
Belly, Of course it was for you but how about filling the room with all One Nation Supporters & any other non-Left & see how you'll go. Q&A is nothing but an ALP propaganda & Feminist to boot machine ! I can just imagine your opinion if Q&A were held in a country town, away from their academic vertebrae. Posted by individual, Wednesday, 17 April 2019 5:43:39 PM
| |
Of note in this case is the hypocrisy which stems from a (nearly) all-encompassing condemnation of Folau whereas, were his religion Islam, we would only be hearing from the Islamophobic Right. I think it is now a well-observed phenomenon that in the Abrahamic family only one member’s intolerance can be safely critiqued with the approval of broader society.
Posted by Ahenobarbus, Wednesday, 17 April 2019 5:56:51 PM
|
I have, even mid post have said is that right
QaA was informative for me
That silly rude man? he was and is every thing that makes me a LABOR man
Foolish uninformed bigoted, and not truly showing anything that would make him worthy of a seat in parliament, well maybe in the toilet block but briefly
And?
Most, on every side, who saw him that night are unimpressed