Anning definitely only slapped the brat. Now Morrison says Anning should be charged, but it's ok to egg Anning.

MY has had his visa to speak here cancelled because of comments made about the NZ mosque attack. None of that freedom of speech nonsense for the Morrison govenment.

And, Foxy's husband of all people should know that she is too much of a know-all windbag to stop commenting on everything that is said.

Dear Belly,

My husband could see how upset the attacks on you
made me - hence his comment. He keeps telling me
to also leave this forum. But I've been here for decades
and have seen people come and go. Many such as yourself,
I consider my friends - we've shared some tough times
together and you've always been here for me. I
remember how devastated I became when I was first diagnosed
with bowel cancer, then when I had all my heart problems.
You supported me through all that and gave me hope.
I came through it all just fine - but being able to
talk with you helped a great deal. Dear Hassie stood
firmly by me as well, as did so many others.

Sharing was the norm in those days. Not so much now. We've
got a nastiness here now that didn't exist in the past.
And we see the worst of this country on offer. Which is a
shame. I feel this is a re-hashing of the narrow-minded
attitudes
and the bigotry - that my parents
must have encountered on their arrival in this country.
Even then there were the nasty types around. It appears
that they haven't died yet.

Anyway, don't leave just yet. Perhaps things will improve
for the better with new people coming on the forum. One can only
hope. Otherwise I shall have to think about taking my
husband's advice as well.

ttbn
Assault charge for alleged egg thrower

Updated 9 Jul 2010, 4:55pm

Police have charged a Perth man with assault after he allegedly threw an egg at Prime Minister Julia Gillard this morning.

The egg whizzed past Ms Gillard as she entered the ABC Perth foyer and hit a female security guard before smashing against a wall.

** But Victoria has the best police money can buy so will be interesting to see what happens **
___________________________________________________

Bazz - Belly has not retracted his post from ( Sunday, 17 March 2019 4:21:25 AM )
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=8709#278455
So I can only assume he stands by what he said, in which case my questions to him stand.

** The only one on this forum blaming the victims for what happened is Belly and of course Paul1405 for his reply to Belly quote "Hi Belly, well said,"

Belly Quote "I know Islamists are our enemies But walking in to a place of worship? unarmed people
How truly gutless, how truly evil how truly dumb"

** Stupid statement, you imply the people in the mosque were our enemies and to blame, You really outdid yourself with that statement. Please explain. **

Quote "Right wing lunatics ensured reprisal assaults will take place"

** How insightful, stating the obvious. The radicals will commit atrociousness against defenseless people no matter what he did **

Quote "Haters must hate, but feeding them is blind stupidity"

** Who is feeding them, I don't see anyone cheering him for doing what he did. **

Quote "unarmed people How truly gutless, how truly evil how truly dumb"

** About as gutless as locking people in cages and setting fire to them, a number of men throwing one person of a building, putting explosives in a church to blow it up when people are in it **

** Where were your statements like that when there are atrocities by radicals against Christians, non Muslims and others? **

Dear AC,

Look at you my friend, ticking every single box that the nob head did. Zero empathy, obvious hatred for outsiders, spending far to much time on race baiting conspiracy sites, easily manipulated, has the mantra down pat, probably single, attention seeker, and probably in the top three of OLO posters Your mindset could take you down the same path.

Dear Bazz,

I was wondering when you might slither on in. Yes your words were indeed taken for the killer's manifesto.

This is you;

“The two invasions of Austria are better known as they were defeated
at the gates of Vienna the last battle in 1683 when Vienna was saved
by the arrival of a Polish Army.”

This is him;

“Even at Vienna in 1683 we Europeans still lost over fourteen thousand good men.”

Or is it the other way around? Bloody hard to tell.

You;

“Many are not aware that an Islamic army invaded and occupied the Vatican.
They were driven out by Italian local provinces.
Rome itself was weakened by the Arab slave trader's raids that over
years captured about one million Europeans and sold them in the
African slave markets.”

Which is just a short step to;

“To take revenge on the invaders for the hundreds of thousands of deaths
caused by foreign invaders in European lands throughout history. To take revenge for the enslavement of millions of Europeans taken from their lands by the Islamic slavers.”

I would happily peg you to join AC as one of the top 3 OLO posters in danger of following said nob-head.

Now here you are, slinging off statistics like your idol our most loathsome Senator.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/wherestheoutrage.jpg

Dear Shadow Minister,

You claim; “You are not blaming this atrocity on the single gunman that acted alone but on everyone that opposes immigration or is concerned about the Islamic terrorism.”

Mate time and time again on this forum I have stated that I want immigration halved and you can be bloody sure I absolutely abhor Islamic terrorism just as much as I hate every form of terrorism. So why say it?

Paul_etc

"mhaze you might find some comfort in the perverted ravings of a lunatic, most of us don't."

Its not about seeking comfort Paul. Its about something you'll struggle to understand - the search for truth and understanding.

People like you and SR have simply decided what Tarrant's motives are and linked him with your political foes.

But it seems to me that if we want to understand or just comprehend his 'thinking' (such as it is) we need to look at what he said his motives and aims are. Just assuming his motives are what you'd hope they were is the opposite of searching for the truth.

The man called himself an eco-facists and green nationalist. He clearly bought the climate change hysteria and the population bomb trope. If, as you do, we are going to burden people who hold anti-mohomedian views as being responsible for his acts, then surely we can likewise burden climate/population fetishists with their share of responsibility.

Alternatively we can accept that extremists take reasonable views and extend them to extremes and that's their responsibility and their's alone. Seeking to use the attacks as a mechanism to shut-down speech you dislike works both ways, much as you'd prefer it didn't.

Belly,

"I fear my brain dying before my body,..."

Have no fear, if your brain is dead your body won't know about it.