The Forum > General Discussion > Pell: Disgraceful Decision
Pell: Disgraceful Decision
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Page 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- ...
- 58
- 59
- 60
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
The argument that a jury of 12 convicted him, is little to no comfort to us, as it has already been said, judging by the details of the trial, this has been one heck of a judicial stuff-up.
And as has been mentioned, NO I do not have faith in the people to make the right decision.
Why should anyone?
What makes the 'people' so smart as to have the intellect to make a judgement call based on reason and common sense, when I have observed all my life, a clear lack of these elements in Australia.
I don't particularly care for what he is being charged with, but so as to put balance back in the discussion, I believe there have been other religious or general institutions that have been found guilty of the same thing as Pell was charged with.
Now it will come as no surprise to my detractors, but I don't particularly care about the so called victim.
Big deal, what a wimp, he should be grateful, he grew up a little more because of such incidents.
He got his 'rocks off', so what.
Imagine for a moment if he/they had been forced to have sex with a nun?
You do-goody types have no idea, we would wearing a beaming smile for days.
The moral of these stories is GROW UP!
We are facilitating a world of pansies.
If what I have read about the evidence, or lack of it, and the way the trial was conducted, all I have come away with, is questions.
And as such, I begin to explore the world of conspiracy's.
As much as some people live in fairy land, bad things are the norm out there.
Imagine if such people were on this jury?
How did it go from 10/2 to acquit, to guilty?
Judging by previous jury verdicts, I thought this one was conspicuously quick.