Well lost the net is mise 6 full 24 hour days,4 before that zero service,10 not service in day working hours NBN working
Let me see, yes I am the same bloke who constantly demands we understand not all Muslims are a threat
Do not like the faith, more than any other
SAW THAT THING, HER CHILD DIED SORRY FOR IT
she never said sorry, enemies who showed no mercy for thousands deserve no mercy
We are at war, with an evil and insane SECTION OF A faith badly needing to leave the dark ages behind

Belly,

Sorry to hear that your computer was down, we use it so often, even for such mundane things as opening times for businesses.

"We are at war, with an evil and insane SECTION OF A faith badly needing to leave the dark ages behind"

Just leave out section, my good mate in India is a practising Muslim, has four wives and is a leader among his people.
He has fought Muslims on the battlefield, killed numbers of them and thinks that Australia is mad to have Muslim migrants.

is mise my point the very thing that has killed mateships even here
not all Muslims are evil
many leave the faith each day
and many who never do would die protecting us
one nation trades in blind stupid hate
PS what would we do if we lost the net say world war? much needed now

When it comes right down to it, if you want to help, then there's some risk that is required. Several European countries opened their borders trying to help, and now the risk is repaid with the cost.

But if you want justice, then help isn't what is required. You've said it yourself. We are at war.

There's not much room for a middle ground here unless spinning our wheels is what we want to do. Act to help, or act to harm. Even to act to do nothing is an act in itself to watch what happens without involvement. Depending on whether the world chooses war or chooses assistance, your doing nothing is an act of agreement with that course of action.

It doesn't have to be an all or nothing kind of deal. Instead there can be a case by case basis. But if you want to help the Muslim people, there is risk involved. If you want justice, then take the side of watching them burn as they kill and murder eachother endlessly.

(Continued)

(Continued)

Sorry Belly. But this discussion is going back and forth of standing against the terrorists, and against Islam (capital letters of not agreeing with the religion); then switching to partially trying to be supportive. They aren't all evil, and a stand against hatred.

If you want to help them then it requires more then back and forth which side of the fence do you stand on, but instead to take a stand instead of spinning our wheels and watching what will happen regardless of our say in it. If the women don't want to apologize, then that is a very hard position to want to help them. On the next case (whatever the case may be in the future) the choice is still do you take on the burden of the risk. Simularily to adopting a drug addicted teen, knowing that they will case trouble, but taking that burden to try and help them.

That's what it will take to help Islamic populations. And honestly, that's too big of an issue to try and save. All anyone can do is choose on a case by case instance to choose to help some and let the others die by their own hands. Or to take the other stance and be against Islam fully. No help because of the danger that they pose.

not-now-soon in your opinion mate
It is not mine, in fact breeding hate,blind hate is always wrong
we are at war, with radical Islam,even the not so radical lard heads from that faith
We will defeat them but not without a fight
not by being kind, to a hate filled group we however do not want to find our humanity lost,one nation can only deliver blind hate
don't want a Labor government? vote LNP not blind radical hate, that is what we are fighting