Belly You are beyond the most naive person on here.
Quote "I can build a case for you slagging me off then retracting your words in an effort to do it again"

** Then do it. **

Quote "Wrong SR reveling your reading list proves you are what you appear to be a badly informed ranter"

** He did not reveal anything just because someone posts a link from one site does not mean they regularly go to that site, the link may have come from another site. **

Quote "Phil over estimating your own ability's and under estimating your opponents is? folly"

** the proof of your education level is in your post. **

Quote "Please understand my PC skills are limited my thanks for any help"
** If you don't know how to do something why don't you get someone to show you how to do it? **

Belly
Why do your repeatedly refuse to admit you were wrong,

Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 2 January 2019 10:57:46 AM You wrote.
"in my view an informative must read this days SMH story on how out of touch we are in politics and numbers of Muslims in this country"

Approx 12.45am I went to the site to read the article, which was not there.

Posted by Philip S, Wednesday, 2 January 2019 12:45:45 PM After not finding the article posted this comment.
"Belly -Why do you post rubbish. Here is a link to SMH, there is no article like you say. http://www.smh.com.au/"

Posted by Bazz, Wednesday, 2 January 2019 3:46:30 PM claimed he saw the article but did not say when, it could have been around the same time you did.

Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 2 January 2019 3:54:39 PM You wrote.
"Philip S RUOK?
Bazz found it I went back after that post to look for it but it was gone
Bazz confirms my statement"

** AGAIN read your own words "I went back after that post to look for it but it was gone" **

** Try to comprehend the timeline above. The article was there according to you BUT it was withdrawn possible just after you and Bazz saw it. **

If you had the brains to post a link people may find your articles, Get it through your head those pages can change on an hourly basis, so no one will be able to find things you say "in my view an informative must read."

Posted by Belly, Thursday, 3 January 2019 5:13:35 AM You wrote.
"Philip S lets look at your baseless charge of false links from me
YOU understand I never posted a link?"

** I never said you post links **

Also NO ONE is questioning you and Bazz saw the article what is in question is the fact that the article was withdrawn soon after you saw it, so no one else got to see it, whereas if you posted a link it may still be there.

Or we'd have a dead link - '404error not found';
And at the least, others could confirm it had been a working link to an article previously.
Gotta agree with you Philip S.

- If it's not too much to ask ALWAYS POST A LINK -

Please.

Dear Philip S,

Now you are just being infantile mate.

You wrote;

“Congratulations you have provided two links that are 6 month old to fake news that in no way proves that every article published on those sites is fake news. Two fake articles 6 months old if that is all you can come up with as opposed to the hundreds of newer articles I call that an epic fail.”

Just listen to yourself. Reputable sites do not do fake news full stop otherwise they wouldn't be deemed reputable. They obviously make mistakes but when those are revealed they then post retractions along with apologies. They also do not engage in unsubstantiated conspiracy nonsense like this;

Journalist Dies Suddenly Just Days After Exposing Mueller, Strzok 'Cover-Up'. 26-year-old Federalist reporter and Fox News pundit killed by 'sudden illness'.

http://neonnettle.com/news/6089-journalist-dies-suddenly-just-days-after-exposing-mueller-strzok-cover-up-

There is absolutely nothing these guy produce that should be taken as factual without extensive checking elsewhere.

Don't feed us this tripe and expect to be ever taken seriously.

Further Queen Elizabeth is apparently a lizard person. Just another piece of top notch journalism from this crowd.

I remember seeing an article where the German Leader Merkel, the UK Prime Minister, and the French Prime Minister discredited Multiculturalism. This seems like the wedge in the road to rationality.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-11559451
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1355961/Nicolas-Sarkozy-joins-David-Cameron-Angela-Merkel-view-multiculturalism-failed.html
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/8685-sarkozy-joins-cameron-merkel-condemns-multiculturalism

But why are some still saying that those against Multiculturalism are evil.

But why are some still saying that those against Multiculturalism are evil.
Canem Malum,
Because many evil-seers reside in those incredibly harmonious cities where the multiculturals' enclaves so warmly embrace the culture & Laws of the hosts & ensure the hosts' taxes are properly distributed. Those against Multiculturalism blatantly try to disrupt this perfect system.
Such baddies those anti-multiculturals.