Bazz, I think you may have looked here (not that I'm wading into this topic, but you got me wondering): https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/opinion-polls.aspx

Once again we find ourselves tossing between fact and fiction, left and right, reality and emotion, and I can go on.
Most of you will not be surprised to hear that I applaud this Anning guy.
I am heartened to see that the only thing the left have picked on (actually two) is that of the Muslim comments.
Now to put some reason back into this discussion, I must point out that it is not practical nor possible to 'send anyone back'.
But we can put a halt to the immigration of a certain people who insight violence as apart of their religion.
It cannot be dismissed simply because there are those within who would feel empathy for certain people.
Someone asked the question which essentially was to decide which would we choose to expatriate, Muslims or Catholic priests, because they violated children.
I would answer; which would you rather be, the child who was violated or dead?
We now know who the pedophiles are in the various religions, because their acts of molestation are now historical, so therefor easy to weed out and punish.
Where-as when a terrorist, terrorises,'people die'.
Now I do not have a complete answer, but it would seem prudent to halt any further immigration of Muslims.
I found it amusing that overhearing a large group of migrants (first gen) mostly a mix of Asians, I found that they had become Aussies.
So much so they were quite adamant that immigration should stop.
They all contributed reasons as to why.
All the reasons were extremely valid.
They ranged from the lack of water to the lack of jobs, in Australia, and many more.
So it is that intelligent mature adults of any race, colour, creed and so on, come to a consensus surprising all who would otherwise see them as traitors to their own people.
It appears that when someone practices a life of inclusion, they, at some point become one with their new home and yep, before you know it they're an Aussie.

ALLTRAV,

"It appears that when someone practices a life of inclusion, they, at some point become one with their new home and yep, before you know it they're an Aussie"

Best of luck, as I posted earlier, the Muslims have had over 1,000 years to integrate in India and there is no sign of any integration yet.

It's not all that long since the last communal riots and only 60 odd years since they split the country apart.

and as an example of peaceful integration,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots_in_India

I believe most people want Sunni Muslims banned from Australia including other Muslims. Muslims kill each other as much as kafir.

Issy, I am agreeing with you.
My point is that 'IF' they practice inclusion or in other words, integration, things would be fine.
But they don't.
In so doing they are not 'trying' to be inclusive.
Quite the opposite by being 'exclusive'.
Unfortunately there is no 'quick' fix.
It is clear to me that the answer is an impossible one.
And that is; if you truly want to get along with other humans on this Earth, you MUST either refute the Muslim religion or at the very least, reject certain 'anti-social' aspects of it.
This is not possible under the teachings of Mohammad.
It is punishable by death for a Muslim to denounce their religion.
So it is they are stuck in this emotional and religious catch 22.
Ergo, it then follows that we have no choice, the evidence is clear, and we must be vigilant as this has become a matter of life or death.
So in relation to the choice between deporting a priest or a terrorist, well I think the answer is obvious.
And for the benefit of the loony and belligerent left, the priests can stay.