[Cont.]

- Sorry about that, I accidentally posted before finished writing whilst using a touch screen phone -

We have the issue of immigration.
Combined with the added input of identity politics were divided on race based issues.

Then take the issue of homosexuality.
Combined with the added input of 'safe schools' 'transgender toilets', were all now divided over sexuality based issues.

I could probably go through a whole list of just about every social issue where some other bs has been added into the narrative to ensure were all well and truly divided against each other over every issue.

And what is the end result?
Well were all completely disunified against each other on so many issues that there is no real sense of national unity;
Because we all now completely disagree on just about everything.

And sometimes we disagree for no other reason than because some people think with emotion and some carefully read the fine print and look at the bigger picture.

Dear AC,

Do you really believe that so many people are concerned
about the issues of homosexuality, transgender, or even
immigration?

Talk to your neighbours and get their opinions - they
just may surprise you as to where their concerns
really lie.

Hi Foxy,
"Do you really believe that so many people are concerned
about the issues of homosexuality, transgender, or even
immigration?"

Well, I really shouldn't assume to know the beliefs and opinions of 25 million other Aussies;
But I think many are concerned about these issues while others are probably not concerned so much at all.

But I was really only using them as examples of the divisiveness.

A friend of mine runs a hairdressing salon.
Her husband recently told me that they had a client who brought their kid to the appointment, and they (the client / parent) had a disagreement with my friend the hairdresser.
The client had issue with my friend not treating her child in a gender neutral manner, over something simple and trivial that she said when speaking with the child.

- Battle of the sexes in Parliament...
- People protesting others right to free speech...

Ultimately, I think the bigger agenda by those who wish to socially engineer society is the destruction of any kind of nationalism, for agendas of globalism and One World government, and planetary rule by the elite.

You can't get the citizens of the world to go along with that unless you destroy or subvert what already exists.
Why else do we have people running around sporting hammer and sickle logos of communism if someone isn't deliberately promoting the ideology?

So for us, they need to destroy and divide our nation to the point we wouldn't recognise our own if abroad.
That there is no general ethnicity, beliefs or culture representative of this nation, just inhabitants that are slave to a larger global system.

To destroy what we have they first need to get all of us living here to argue over everything.
I do honestly think that's largely where we are at presently.

Just for a few seconds imagine you owned a corner store, you sold one product, politics,as people walked past on their way to work or the cafe down the road you would want them to come in and at least browse around ok? say your window display was an item called policies, you dressed the window with, work till you are 70! tax cuts for the banks that are under investigation! no pension rises! get your health cuts here!education costs to rise! and across the road the other shop had screaming headlines BLAH BLAH BLAH! in its windows are we getting the point?

All talk and no action Belly?

Armchair Critic let me see are you telling me the same sex debate is the reason the big two have lost votes, look let me be clear I do not care what same sex couples do, , voted to give them rights, what your point is not clear to me, however both sides have lost first preference votes over the last two decades, on the face of it those who left in the end never found what they wanted from the smaller parties and their vote returned hence two party prefered