Typical Left, blaming the incumbend for the consequences of the failures of his/her idealistic academic predecessors.
Just look at Australia where we still haven't recovered from the Whitlam administration's policies which eventually resulted in the detention centres that are now so hottly disputed by the decsendents of his supporters.
These rose-coloured view hot-heads just can't grasp that bad policy doesn't suddenly vanish with the change of a Government. These policies can take decades before they really impact as is evident by the example above.

>>Could you kindly give us a reference to the information
that you're claiming about the child.<<

For instance,

https://www.lifesitenews.com/pulse/fake-news-iconic-crying-migrant-girl-was-never-separated-from-mother-says-f?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com&utm_campaign=b2446554c9-Daily%2520Headlines%2520-%2520World_COPY_268&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_12387f0e3e-b2446554c9-402360557

Oh I see Foxy you don't mind total dishonesty being used in order to promote open borders. Unbelievably deceitful

https://www.infowars.com/fake-news-crying-child-used-by-time-magazine-cnn-was-never-separated-from-her-mother/

//Could you kindly give us a reference to the information
that you're claiming about the child.//

Or if you'd prefer links that work:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/06/22/the-crying-honduran-girl-on-the-cover-of-time-was-not-separated-from-her-mother-father-says/?utm_term=.3034baeb6c11

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2018/06/18/i-wanted-to-stop-her-crying-the-image-of-a-migrant-child-that-broke-a-photographers-heart/?utm_term=.faf23e01a8de

Note that not all of runner's claims are supported (gosh what a surprise), but no, the little girl was not separated from her mother. Time initially misreported that she had been, but swiftly issued a correction at the request of the photographer.

"Time also has added a correction to an online article and gallery that ran Tuesday, before the cover was released: “The original version of this story misstated what happened to the girl in the photo after she [was] taken from the scene. The girl was not carried away screaming by U.S. Border Patrol agents; her mother picked her up and the two were taken away together.”

Moore, the photographer, told The Post in an email that Time corrected the story after he made a request minutes after it was published. He said that the picture “is a straightforward and honest image” showing a “distressed little girl” whose mother was being searched by border officials."

Considering it was the photographer himself requested the correction - and that Time did so without hesitation - it's clear that these cries of 'conspiracy!' are just another alt-right beat-up.

//you don't mind total dishonesty being used in order to promote open borders.//

Nobody is proposing open borders, runner, just not separating children from their parents. Now who's being dishonest?

Actually, that accusation of dishonesty may have been a little unfair. Do you actually understand the difference between the two?

Note what Trump said about the separation (permanent) of offspring from their families when they were murdered by illegal scum.

You Reds don't care about separated children; you just hate Trump. Pretty pathetic, really, as the man has nothing to do with you and couldn't care less about you and your virtue-signalling.