Is Mise - Thanks for the tip. Have you seen the picture before?

Foxy - I think in the UN Hate Speech is to prevent incitement. But it has been used more broadly. Spectacularly in the UK. The Hate Speech concept is controversial and it was only with intense lobbying that the US accepted it with caveats 26 years after it was adopted and 32 years after the draft. Anyway its bad form for international law to interfere in the internal affairs of countries sovereignty. It undermines self determination. But the Socs and Caps both believe that the most important battle is between the Employers and the Workers. They just disagree on who the winner should be. This is the source of the ALT right and left movements (Read Rabbit on the ALT left - A Clockwork Greenshirt). The employers are rationalizing the workers are dividing. What will become of us. (Hilarious when its not happening to you)
The solution to conflict is a policy of population reduction that both the Socs and Caps are against. (Hilarious)
The best management involves setting the game so that people do the right things because its in their interest - No conflict for resources, no need for anti Hate Speech laws

Dear Belly,

Welcome back. Haven't seen posts from you recently. R u ok?

One Nation has lost another senator to Bob Katter. Now, if you really want to talk about 'peculiar', there is no better subject than Bob Katter.

Dear Canem Malum,

An important element in any peace process is the
international community and its mechanisms for
restraining conflict among its members.

Before the twentieth century, there were few
institutionalised ways of hostile nations to achieve
peaceful settlements. When negotiations took place,
they often occurred only after a war - for the
purpose of agreeing in a peace treaty that would
specify the spoils of the victor. Although the
structure of our international peace-making may seem
rudimentary and of course not perfect, it now offers
infinitely better prospects for helping nations to
avoid war.

Particularly in a world where all nations face a common
threat of direct or indirect involvement in nuclear
warfare, some reliable method is needed to limit
conflict among sovereign states.

Pauline Hanson is a breath of fresh air. A clear thinking lady, who actually can sort fact from fiction, & is not afraid to shout the truth from a hill top. We needed her.

What she is not is a good manager, or a good judge of people. I did hope that this time round she would hasten much more slowly in the selection of candidates, & the expansion of her party.

We are very much in need of a party to counterbalance the greens, but I'm afraid one nation & Pauline are not going to be such a party.

She has to a large extent achieved her purpose. She brought home to the political class just how unhappy many of us were at the direction they wanted to push us. Both the Labor & Liberal parties saw this, & corrected many of their bad policies. Pauline has thus had a very real & beneficial effect on the nation.

The greens are horrified of course, which proves how right her ideas & policies really are.

Can One Nation survive as a party, probably not. So thanks Pauline, you may never be able to establish a working party, but you have achieved a great deal for the average Ozzie in your efforts. You can now retire with dignity, & the gratitude of so many.

Taking Foxys advice in her first few words conflict is not my intent here in this post ever willing to get involved in verbal tennis but why at this time? Hanson, in my view is not one of the things Hasbeen called her, apart from being very near finished, she is a product of the uniformed nature of SOME voters,past ones included the DLP Palmer united, Democrats,each took votes from another party but voted with that party, EG Greens in the end, so Pauline you bought out the worst in us, those who in the end had expectations of you, that if delivered, could have crippled our trade growth, and who knows what else