Canem Malum,

It's a necessary trick on OLO to remove the 's' from 'https' to get a link to come up properly, people often won't bother to look otherwise.

Thus:
http://www.moillusions.com/wp-content/uploads/photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5639/2020/400/chica_o_vieja.jpg

Dear Canem Malum,

Free speech means you can say whatever you want - hate speech
is when people say things that are rightly harmful,
offensive to a particular group of people - Pauline Hanson
people find objectionable - because that's what she does.

Now you may argue that because we all have free speech we
should be allowed to listen to people who say these things.
And we should engage in healthy debate. And in principal yes,
we should always consider different opinions and different
world views - otherwise society would never progress.
However, the lady in question is not capable of debating
her views. She merely repeats them.

This opens up her opinion to criticism. Free speech works
both ways. If her speech becomes hate speech then many
people can use their right to free speech to complain and
critique her. - Not because she's a former fish and chip shop
owner - but because of what she's spouting and promoting.

Got that very right Foxy, judge one nation on its last two election results, take on boards its over all number of votes that put some of it senators in the house that senators first preference that is 77 in one case we are not talking about a mainstream party, but a decaying one soon to go belly up

he backed up his facts very well. Irrefutable
Canem Malum,
Yes, but he failed miserably in backing up his own integrity. Bet he's not game enough to publish his carbon footprint.

In defence of Pauline Hanson and the One Nation party. They have as much right to seek political office as does Malcolm Turnbull and Bill Shorten, Liberal and Labor parties, dare I say Richard Di Natale and The Greens also have the same right, as do all the rest of the motley crew.
The majority might be irksome to those who disagree, but never the less in a democracy they have the same rights as all others, including the ones you support, end of story.

judge one nation on its last two election results,
Belly,
That's simply a reflection of the electorate not One Nation. ON would be scoring much higher were they to tell as many phibs & promise as much as the ALP?LNP. The reasons for ON to trail the majors are the selfishness & disregard for others of the voters.
Just take yourself as an example; you're die hard Labor no mattter how detrimental they always are to the nation. I used to feel similar as strongly about the Coalition but i woke up.