The tax bill for not putting GST on tampons has successfully
passed in the Senate.

It's interesting that Pauline Hanson did not support
this bill. She apparrently thought it fair to have a
tax on essentials like tampons and pads (after all it's
only women who use them - right?) And women are the
majority of her supporters - are you taking this in ladies?

Whereas men don't pay tax on condoms or viagra - they're
considered essential health items.

Very much aware a supporter of one notion, mate of near 40 years is here on this site, reading my words in this thread, hostility is no answer for us the truth will have to do, no matter what any one thinks of Hanson, and in her first high visibility run, she said things many agreed with, she can after recent debacles never progress, a election right now, of both houses, may see her as the only member of her Hanson pty ltd party, it is her party, recent legal changes made that clear,its ashes will by laid aside those of the DLP DEMOCRATS, PUP, and a host of as yet unknown small party's unable to change voters intention to vote for the majors

Dear Belly,

I certainly hope that you're right.

Foxy said- "The tax bill for not putting GST on tampons has successfully passed in the Senate. It's interesting that Pauline Hanson did not support this bill. She apparrently thought it fair to have a tax on essentials like tampons and pads (after all it's
only women who use them - right?) And women are the majority of her supporters - are you taking this in ladies? Whereas men don't pay tax on condoms or viagra - they're considered essential health items."

Answer- I thought most right wing politicians support the view that GST should apply to everything in order to simplify the system. That was the view of John Howard it was only the intervention of Meg Lees- Leader of the Democrats that created the "no GST on essentials" policy. This would imply that Pauline Hanson probably wouldn't support Condoms or Viagra either as part of the scheme.

"Pauline Hanson (with many others in parliament) is not against women she's against chaos".

Sometimes a little chaos is necessary- she made a judgement call.

I'm sure given that you are a well read person you would be aware of this fact but are just using this to support your argument. If you want your arguments to have integrity it's important to give credit where due- you don't have to like them or trust them.

'she's against chaos!" The Lovely Pauline does a good job of creating enough chaos in the Parliament. Why is she against it?

Former, as of yesterday, One Nation dingo Brian Burston, has quit the party and, wait for it, has joined Crazy Clive's non existent UAP. The blokes a joke!

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-18/brian-burston-will-run-for-clive-palmers-party-next-election/9879984

In the above link you may see a pair of stunned mullets, aka Crazy Clive and Dingo Brian.

History yet to be written will shake its head in wounder at our Pauline Hanson, if it is truly written it will say she, some times,mirrored a fear some held about the changing nature of our country bought about by migration/refugees, it must if true, tell of the first crash and burn life of that party, then its second incarnation, and its impending death, have we seen the party reported its self [SMH today] for its NSW branch being run by remote control? ample room exists in the coalition, for those who support her to be heard, in fact she almost all the time, votes with her former party, may yet do so in relation to the tax cuts,her supporters if they are determined to vote for her should put the ballot once filled in, in the rubbish tin at the door, Australia is better than this party