The Forum > General Discussion > Arpartheit for Hospitals
Arpartheit for Hospitals
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
-
- All
Posted by ttbn, Friday, 6 April 2018 10:33:16 AM
| |
Dear Big Nana,
Kindly go back and read the link that I gave from Media Watch. It will clarify things for you. As pointed out in the transcript - "The glossary is not the code that nurses must adhere to. Nurses are not required, forced, or even encouraged to announce their white privilege to patients before treating them, or indeed at all." Dear Bazz, I'll leave the crying entirely up to you. It may help. Posted by Foxy, Friday, 6 April 2018 11:12:16 AM
| |
Foxy,
Then why is it in the glossary? "glossary ˈɡlɒs(ə)ri/ noun an alphabetical list of words relating to a specific subject, text, or dialect, with explanations; a brief dictionary." http://www.google.com.au/search?q=glossary+meaning&rlz=1C1CAFB_enAU718AU718&oq=glossary&aqs=chrome.2.69i57j0l5.6487j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Posted by Is Mise, Friday, 6 April 2018 1:30:00 PM
| |
Dear Is Mise,
Because a glossary is simply a list of terms that may be unfamiliar to some readers. Go back and re-read the Media Watch transcript that I gave earlier. It explains that it is not the code that nurses must adhere to. Posted by Foxy, Friday, 6 April 2018 1:45:50 PM
| |
Foxy,
I do suggest you read Big Nana's post (on page 4). As usual this poster makes more practical sense than most. Me thinks Big Nana has sorted the real reason they now want separate waiting areas. Advantage is the word, not culture. Runner has already mentioned about aborigines not turning up for dialysis. That requires personal responsibility. Posted by Banjo, Friday, 6 April 2018 2:18:07 PM
| |
Dear Banjo,
I've already read Big Nana's post. I have also responded to it. Posted by Foxy, Friday, 6 April 2018 3:52:53 PM
|
Regarding your comments on what universities teach, a survey completed in 2017 by the IPA revealed that 81 per cent of Australian universities are “actively hostile" to free speech.
Nothing we didn't know or suspect. I find the suggestion that there 19% who are OK with free speech a bit suss, though.