The mainstream media isn't there to inform you, it's job is to subtly manipulate you into thinking a certain way about a certain issue.
The reason you don't hear about this is because it doesn't fit the anti-gun narrative.
You also won't hear about how many of these shooters were on prescription drugs and not in their right mind.
You won't hear that 1.5 million crimes in the US are thwarted by guns, whilst police only arrive after crimes are committed.
They won't tell you that most of the crimes are gang related, in Democrat controlled cities which already have anti-gun laws or that most gun crimes happens in conjuction with the war on drugs.
If one was to read between the lines and remember Democrats were the ones who were supportive of KKK and opposed abolition of slavery one might see a larger more disturbing picture.
They use immigrants to shore up voting block and stay in power, trick blacks into supporting them while they remain oppressed and entrenched in ghettos and profiteer off them by drugs sold to them; acquired within overseas US military operations; a situation designed for profit and to create statistics for an anti-gun anti-constitutional globalist corporate agenda; with big pharma doing their part by making sure everyone medicated with SSRI's and their known side effects of making people go crazy.

In the bigger picture, the US's greatest export is 'death', how many innocent people will be killed by its arms sales to Saudi Arabia and others?

//On 1/4/18 daylight savings ends in NSW, and our clocks will re-synchronise with OLO's.//

See Is Mise, I told you so.

Now, were we on gun control?

//I've also said that I'm in favour of strict storage//

Well that's a good start I suppose, although I wonder if you've really thought this one through. When one of the drug crazed psychos that you're convinced lurks on every street corner bursts through your door with a machete, do you really think he's going to wait politely while you unlock your gun safe before he tries to hack you to death?

It's just that you're always going on about how important it is to let people have guns for their own self-protection against drug crazed psychos, mass shooters, terrorists, Greens voters et. al. - and when you're banging that drum you don't seem to give a fig for proper storage. It sounds like you're trying to eat your cake and have it too. So which are you really in favour of: having guns ready and instantly available in case of sudden home/school/theatre/wherever invasion, or keeping them properly secured where they can't fall into the wrong hands?

//If one was to read between the lines and remember Democrats were the ones who were supportive of KKK and opposed abolition of slavery one might see a larger more disturbing picture.
They use immigrants to shore up voting block and stay in power, trick blacks into supporting them while they remain oppressed and entrenched in ghettos and profiteer off them by drugs sold to them; acquired within overseas US military operations; a situation designed for profit and to create statistics for an anti-gun anti-constitutional globalist corporate agenda; with big pharma doing their part by making sure everyone medicated with SSRI's and their known side effects of making people go crazy.//

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytVXev5GVHM

Thanks for that Toni.
I knew how my comment sounded when I wrote it, so I'll accept your response as reasonable.
I don't think you're aware of many things that go on regards US though.

So I never noticed that OLO was out of time with the rest of NSW, mea culpa.

Toni,

"It's just that you're always going on about how important it is to let people have guns for their own self-protection"

When and where have I ever said that?