Toni,

Well perhaps I have the wrong impression, but that's the impression that I get from someone who has to attempt to be humourous at the expense of dead teachers and pupils.

Paul,

I'd recommend a Smart pistol in a calibre of at least .38 Special, and as for arming teachers in Australian schools, well we haven't had a school shooting here and there is no point in being pre-emptive; is there?

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27520267

//that's the impression that I get from someone who has to attempt to be humourous at the expense of dead teachers and pupils.//

Nobody is having a joke at the victims' expense. We're having a joke at the expense of idiots like you, and apparently you're not bright enough to tell the difference.

"Nobody is having a joke at the victims' expense. We're having a joke at the expense of idiots like you, and apparently you're not bright enough to tell the difference."

Don't try and weasel out, Tiger.

//Don't try and weasel out, Tiger.//

What the hell are you talking about, you daft twat? If you can't comprehend simple English, that's not my problem. It's yours.

As I said, Tiger.

Well, how could a school teacher save the kids from a killer?

//As I said, Tiger.

Well, how could a school teacher save the kids from a killer?//

Ahhhh... enlightenment dawns. I think I see the source of your confusion, Mr. Iceberg lettuce.

You feel that because the teacher in the Monty Python sketch is an absurd, overblown caricature that I was drawing a comparison between him and other teachers, and thus insinuating that they're all just as mental as John Cleese turning the mental up to eleven for comic purposes.

At this point, I considered explaining the actual joke to you. But then I decided not to, because spoilers. Are you familiar with the old analogy about explaining jokes and dissecting animals?