Dear Shadow minister,

You really are more slippery than a butchers dick aren't you.

The reason we can't get to Molan is you refuse to accept even the most basic evidence even from the BBC but offer nothing to refute it.

This is probably the incident regarding Hamas to which you are referring;

“Yesterday, in the course of the regular inspection of its premises, UNRWA discovered approximately 20 rockets hidden in a vacant school in the Gaza Strip. UNRWA strongly condemns the group or groups responsible for placing the weapons in one of its installations. This is a flagrant violation of the inviolability of its premises under international law. This incident, which is the first of its kind in Gaza, endangered civilians including staff and put at risk UNRWA’s vital mission to assist and protect Palestine refugees in Gaza.”
https://www.unrwa.org/newsroom/press-releases/unrwa-strongly-condemns-placement-rockets-school

The school had not been used as such for over 4 months. So following your logic being devoid of students it becomes just a building and doesn't allow the label of a war crime, so why use it on Hamas?

But note your morally bereft stance. To you hiding of weapons is more of a crime than occupying a school and mowing down unarmed civilian protestors, or closing a hospital during a conflict order the removal of all patients then placing snipers above it. How many people perished through lack of medical care? This was a war crime.

This kind of perverse thinking is hardly likely to offer any possibility of you accepting Molan should be brought before an international court on charges is it.

So you tell me mate, Molan says there was only one civilian casualty during that period of fighting. Do you believe it?

Steele you are arguing with an unfair advantage, you have actually read General Brassbottoms book, while Shadow was busy with the Charlie Chuckles column, aka Andy Bolt, in the 'Telecrap' shame on you! Next time you will have to argue over something Shadow reads, like 'Alice In Wonderland'.
Shadow when can we expect that imminent arrest in the Bolt beat up you claimed was about to happen?

SR,

You grow more slippery every day.

More like this:

"UN Report Confirms Hamas Stored and Fired Weapons from UN Schools"

http://www.thetower.org/1955-un-report-confirms-hamas-stored-and-fired-weapons-from-un-schools/

"Hamas admits it DID use schools and hospitals in Gaza Strip as 'human shields' to launch rocket attacks on Israel - but claims it was 'mistake'"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2753176/Hamas-DID-use-schools-hospitals-Gaza-Strip-human-shields-launch-rocket-attacks-Israel-admits-says-mistake.html

The only reason that the schools were empty at the time of the inspection was that it was school holidays. However, the children were still using the playgrounds.

"Only the people responsible can know for sure why Palestinian militants would use civilian buildings, but any real possibility is bad. Maybe militant groups use civilian buildings like this UN school simply because they don't mind the danger this creates for the Palestinians they claim to protect. Maybe it's because they are hoping that the rockets will be safer in a UN school because Israel won't want to bomb it, which means using Palestinians kids and teachers as human shields. An argument you hear from Hamas's harshest critics is that they are hoping Israel will target the schools, thus rallying people to their side."

As far as the "school" incident was concerned, it appears that the soldiers were fired on by some of the "unarmed" protesters. As far as the hospital was concerned, evacuating patients from the center of a raging conflict is hardly a war crime. SR you are clutching at straws and sinking rapidly.

Paul,

Lying again, I never claimed that the arrest was imminent or about to happen, those are your words.

Apart from the the usual and total diversion from the actual topic, which was about a politician and his first day at work and not about his past life a a soldier; and apart from the crap from the two resident Ranters, Paul and SteeleRedux, this has been an interesting discussion, highlighting the ignorance of some, and the intelligence of others. If you are interested to know more about Ranters, information on these 17th Century lunatics is available on the internet. For people who believe in evolution, our two Ranters don't seem to have evolved at all from the ignorance of 300 years ago.

So the General is a SAenator now given the lacksadaisical procedures of the fascist's/tory's/conservative's coalition. I wouldn't believe this bloke is he told me that the sun was going to rise in the morning. I wouldn't trust him as far as I could spit. Giving accounts conflicting with 1) the Red Cross 2) Medicines sans Frontieres 3) the UN Raconteur in Fallujah. I know who I would believe and for all those virtue signalling so-called patriots who rush to his defence because he was a general in uniform I ask them what was the justification for commencing the war in Iraq and our participation in it however small? Answer: absolutely none. I support Adam Bandt on this and agree that from the evidence presented Jim Molan is a war criminal and his membership of the Liberal party makes him a fascist who is a danger to Australia and mankind. I hope the Greens and the ALP pile in on him. worthless piece of garbage!!

Dear Shadow Minister,

"So you tell me mate, Molan says there was only one civilian casualty during that period of fighting. Do you believe it?"