The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > The Socialist Conspiracy

The Socialist Conspiracy

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All
diver dan "Religion is a socialist concept."

Wrong. One's soul's relationship to the Divine is utterly personal and individual.
You cannot be collectively saved or enlightened.

"A war with a Islam, will be one the homosexual activists will not win"

They wouldn't be fighting alone.

Since militant Muslims would define all non-Muslims (and even some Muslims!) as the enemy, a war with Muslims would involve all non-Muslims.
It is a war *they* cannot win.

The only, eternal war is not between good and evil, but between the honest and the dishonest.

All utopian, idealist religious and political agendas are the latter. Which is why they cause so much trouble.
Posted by Shockadelic, Friday, 1 December 2017 9:24:57 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The denigration of the Soviet Union and Communists China as examples of the failure of Socialism to be a positive system of government for a modern nation such as Australia is totally erroneous. Detractors fail to take into account the extremely horrific circumstances both Russia and China found themselves in immediately before the revolutions which led to the implementation of quasi Communist regimes in both countries. Those extreme examples of state control are no more valid that the use of the post industrial revolution period in Europe in the nineteenth century, or the time of the Great Depression of the 1930's as examples of the failure of Capitalism to deliver true economic benefit to the majority.
What does work in a stable economic environment, free of social and political upheaval, is a democratic mix of the best aspects of progressive Socialism and responsible Capitalism. The economic arguments concerning wealth distribution in Australia centre around the implantation of moderate political policy, and as how best reasonable wealth distribution should be achieved, not should it be achieved at all. No major political party in Australia argues at the extremes, total government control, or no state intervention at all. Australia is not perfect, but it is closer than most.
Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 2 December 2017 5:43:53 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It's been a while but when Aboriginals had free , fair distribution the pharaohs built pyramids by total god-king control. Rome had the same elitism as did medieval feudal church control of estates and of lawyers. Find Egyptian DNA in Roman banking and it's solved.
Posted by nicknamenick, Saturday, 2 December 2017 7:07:18 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Shockadelic.

*…You cannot be collectively saved or enlightened…*

That is so spiritually. But I talk of the religious institution. Particularly Christianity: But not confined to Christianity alone.

It is a collective of like minds, watching over the collective welfare of the flock. Socialism!

*…"A war with a Islam, will be one the homosexual activists will not win"…*

Give me an example where in the past, the “rainbow-jackboot” has dared to encroach on the Muslim Parade.

*…They wouldn't be fighting alone…*

Not at all. There are plenty engaged in the march away from Christianity, willing to re-engage with a religion sharing the same God, and demonstrating a Christian morality.

*…It is a war *they* cannot win…*

How can an eternal war be lost?

*…honest and the dishonest…*

Exactly, good and evil!
Posted by diver dan, Saturday, 2 December 2017 9:39:40 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Paul1405,

The book itself 'None Dare Call it Conspiracy' actually refers to 'Communism' as being a conspiracy of Western elites.

In regards to your comment on the Great Depression being failures of Capitalism, I want you to consider a section of the above mentioned book in Chapter 2 which discusses whether things actually happen by accident or by design.
http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=NoneDare&C=1.0

But going further; you all know I'm against a Globalist One World Government / New World Order, with their slow incremental move to the left to impose Socialism and then Communism upon the masses.

The Communist Manifesto is the path devised (not by Marx) but by Adam Weishaupt and Rothchild of the Bavarian Illuminati; this is what the book alleges.

Now the problem for me; being that I'm against this Global Government is that I do actually support your stance on this:

"What does work in a stable economic environment, free of social and political upheaval, is a democratic mix of the best aspects of progressive Socialism and responsible Capitalism."

You may remember that I myself proposed and often speak about a 'Socialist Base-Level Employment Scheme'.
Not because I want to destroy Capitalism, but because I want to strengthen it.

- The Job You Have When You Don't Have a Job -
To create a culture of employment within the ranks of the unemployed and to remove the 'I can't get a job' excuse.
Double Dole Payment in exchange for full-time work;
Doing things that help the government to save money.

So I'm for refining the best 'type' of government that would best benefit the people, but I'm opposed to the slow slide towards the Global Government and New World Order that the book suggests the globalist elites want.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Saturday, 2 December 2017 10:39:39 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto.

1. Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Saturday, 2 December 2017 10:40:15 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy