ALTRAV,

Forget the semantics. The are too many Muslims in Australia, and a 77% increase in any amount is an increase that we do not need.

Paul,

You try to hide behind 'atheism' but you cannot disguise your Christianophobia. The Left is the natural ally of totalitarian Islam. For that reason, the Left never criticises Isalm, but refers only to 'religion'.

This is obviously the type of future Foxy supports and wants for Australian women:
http://drsircus.com/world-news/islamic-rape-epidemic/

Dear AC,

To state something like that is rather low.
I stand by my posting record on this forum
where I have made it quite clear many times
that I do not support violence of any kind
and those who choose to practice it should
have the full force of the law thrown at them.
You should be ashamed of yourself for using
these kind of tactics on a public forum.
As far as I am concerned you have lost all
credibility Sir.

Hey Foxy,
"You make no distinction between fundamentalists, extremists, terrorists, and the Muslim population in general."

Lets talk about that.

Is it far to say that Islamic society has shown itself to be more problematic to western society than our traditional australian way of life? Yes or NO.
My opinion - Yes.

Should I make that distinction?
Given that making that distinction constantly serves to give that segment of people a free pass for their behaviour.

What if 99 out of 100 Muslims were committing acts that went against what Australians traditionally considered acceptable in our society?

Would you then say it's wrong to 'generalise' because just one out of a hundered was a decent person?

The fact remains Islam brings with it all of the things I previously mentioned, people who say 'It's wrong to generalise' are just making in easier for the criminals in that demographic to continue to commit crimes against the Australian people with less scrutiny.

These crimes get less scrutiny for no other reason that 'we might be victimising minorities'
Who exactly are the victims then?

All this PC crap does is prevent us all from having the guts to dig a little deeper and discuss matters realistically.

Dear AC,

I have stated quite clearly in the past that
in this country there is one law we are all expected
to abide by. It is the law enacted by Parliament
under the Australian Constitution. Religion instructs
its adherents on faith, morals, and conscience. But
there is not a separate stream of law derived from
religious sources that competes with or supplants
Australian law in governing our civil society. The
source of our law is the democratically elected
legislature. There are countries that apply religious
or sharia law - and if a person wants to live under
sharia law these are the countries where they might
feel at ease. But not Australia.

We are asking all our citizens to subscribe to a
framework that can protect the rights and liberties of
us all. These are not optional. We expect everyone
who lives in this country to subscribe to them.

Terrorists and those who support them and do not
acknowledge the rights and liberties of others -
the right to live without being maimed, the right to
live without being bombed and therefore they forfeit
the right to join in Australian citizenship and will
be dealt with accordingly to our rule of law.

I can't make it any clearer for you.

Foxy,

How long did it take your spacecraft to reach this planet?