Altrav,

If you saw it on Google, just post a link.

Hey ALTRAV,
Ok, I googled it.
Is this what you were reading? (on some sketchy looking bible site)
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_rothschild04.htm
The backlink to David Icke's website doesn't go to an article.
So I searched his site and found this:
http://www.davidicke.com/article/146302/19836-was-hitler-a-secret-agent-of-the-rothschilds
http://www.davidicke.com/article/148811/24765-did-hitler-blame-all-jews-for-the-manipulation-of-rothschild-zionist-bankers
- Also seem like they are linked to external bible sites...

Why can't you add links yourself?
Are you using some stupid old xbox for internet browsing or something?
Why can't you copy out the links by hand then type them into your comments?
And all this 'conspiracy' stuff is kind of off-topic, lucky no-one really cares too much about Iftihar
(because of the crappy things he says)

"Surely your not OK with scamming, whether 100 years ago or 100 years from now?"
Of course I'm not ok with it, I told you private central banking is a ponzi scheme.
You outta look into 'Bank of North Dakota' and also 'The Comer Lawsuit'
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-case-to-reinstate-the-bank-of-canada/5430132

"What he did was WAY beyond any kind of traditional trading techniques, of any age."

- I dunno, investing is just 'educated gambling', and what he did is not really much different to playing poker; bullying other players on the table when you're in a commanding chip position...

They would've all followed his trades in the stockmarket to make money off him, so really he just did the same thing to them - you want to follow me then fine, follow this, and he used his commanding chip position to initiate panic-selling... the rest is history.
- And he got the info by 'carrier pigeon' I believe, you said something else..

Happy now?
This really doesn't have much to do with 'Muslim Community', you realise that right?

AC, I have to agree with you. I don't know how we got off topic, but I will rectify that immediately and cease and desist any further discussion on same. I do however welcome any future discussion on my favourite family. Another day.
Is Mise, my apologies. As I previously mentioned I'm one of the old farts brigade. I am not computer savy, and at my age and state in life I enjoy debating and arguing with anyone who will bother, but the most I do on the computer normally is play, wait for it; SOLITAIRE. Although I have at some rare time in the past and recently written down the site and typed it in as I just did with the Rothschild site I mentioned. Anyway I look forward to another interesting post soon.

Hey ALTRAV,
If you're really into all this kind of stuff I think you should buy some books.
Fritz Springmeier's 'Bloodlines of the Illuminati' seems interesting.
http://rense.com/general77/POWERS.HTM

There's a whole heap of reading in this category, I myself always meant to get some of them and learn more myself but never got around to it.
Also I think there might be a wealth of good information on that website I found and mentioned earlier:
http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp

I think it may even contain text versions of many of these books.
I saw 'None Dare Call it Conspiracy' on there.
http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=NoneDare

If you aren't good with all the facts you're always going to be put under pressure when challenged on these types of issues; and you will get challenged, you must expect it.
If you're unprepared, you'll only look stupid and do more harm than good.
Learn more, and choose your battles.
Best of luck to you.

Just started reading 'None Dare Call it Conspiracy'
http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=NoneDare&C=1.0

It's a good book, 45 years old and still spot on.
Far better than you can expect from modern news and opinion.

"Most intellectuals, pseudo and otherwise, deal with the conspiratorial theory of history simply by ignoring it. They never attempt to refute the evidence. It can't be refuted. If and when the silent treatment doesn't work, these "objective" scholars and mass media opinion molders resort to personal attacks, ridicule and satire. The personal attacks tend to divert attention from the facts which an author or speaker is trying to expose. The idea is to force the person exposing the conspiracy to stop the exposure and spend his time and effort defending himself.

However, the most effective weapons used against the conspiratorial theory of history are ridicule and satire. These extremely potent weapons can be cleverly used to avoid any honest attempt at refuting the facts. After all, nobody likes to be made fun of. Rather than be ridiculed most people will keep quiet; and, this subject certainly does lend itself to ridicule and satire. One technique which can be used is to expand the conspiracy to the extent it becomes absurd. For instance, our man from the Halls of Poison Ivy might say in a scoffingly arrogant tone, "I suppose you believe every liberal professor gets a telegram each morning from conspiracy headquarters containing his orders for the day's brainwashing of his students?" Some conspiratorialists do indeed overdraw the picture by expanding the conspiracy (from the small clique which it is) to include every local knee-jerk liberal activist and government bureaucrat. Or, because of racial or religious bigotry, they will take small fragments of legitimate evidence and expand them into a conclusion that will support their particular prejudice, i.e., the conspiracy is totally "Jewish", "Catholic", or "Masonic". These people do not help to expose the conspiracy, but, sadly play into the hands of those who want the public to believe that all conspiratorialists are screwballs."

That book is gold - essential reading.
I wish I'd read it years ago, and actually feel like my IQ has increased just reading it.