OK here is only one example for those of you who question the origins of my comments. Remember, I only ask the questions. You can scoff and demean my comments but I am simply passing on what I recall of these articles. You can refute them all you want but remember, you wanted verification of my comments. None of you can confirm the veracity of these articles. So unless you have 'un-disputed' proof contradicting these articles, I have done my part by giving you the details of just one of my sources, so you can stop shooting the messenger now.
I can't link, but here is the title, Google it.

'Was Hitler a Rothschild?' by David Icke.

If this is 'an inconvenient truth' I would ask why? You have been hoodwinked into believing the Rothschilds are saints. Well they're not! You have seen what 'they' want you to see, now just for a moment consider, you might be wrong. I think this articles articulates the facts clearly enough so as to leave no ambiguities.

//'Was Hitler a Rothschild?' by David Icke.//

The David Icke? David 'Alien Lizardmen Walk Amongst Us' Icke?

Well now I know you're just taking the piss.

//I think this articles articulates the facts//

Well clearly not if it's by David Icke. The man doesn't write non-fiction. He's a science fiction writer who has copied L. Ron Hubbard's trick of boosting books sales by pretending to believe that your fiction is real.

Hey ALTRAV
"I'm sorry if my comments don't appeal."

Don't be sorry, you'll just come off as pathetic, after already coming off as a bit of a kook;
It's not a good look, but if that's what you were trying to achieve, go right ahead.
Get wise, do your research and choose your battles ALTRAV.
And if you can't add links, then best not to rant in the first place.

Why exactly do you think that suggesting a link with the title "Was Hitler a Rothschild? would suffice as evidence?
Obviously a video with that title poses a 'question' does it not?

If you're gonna jump in the deep end ALTRAV, then you need to learn to swim.
If you don't, you're just going to drown.
I ain't jumping in to save you, you need to learn to swim by yourself.
You're only making me look bad flailing around atm.

There's plenty of evidence.
You just think your time is better spent ranting about 'something' you learned 'one little snippet of info' rather than actually looking into it and learning ALL about it.

Here's a website I just found.
Not sure how good the content is.
http://modernhistoryproject.org/

Hey Toni, - Yoda
http://youtu.be/-IUMCyAR6U0

Look guys, you can't say do your research then turn around and say NO that info is no good. I didn't write this stuff. You can't have it both ways. If you have a problem with any info presented, go and bitch to the author or the printer. On the other hand if you simply don't like the information because you think the Rothschids are nice people, well tough 'if the shoe fits', as they say. What is it with you people. If the info I come up with is 'lies' and fabrications of a bent and twisted mind, fine, but how the hell am I supposed to know, and much more importantly who the hell are you guys to make outright statements of discredit. By all means mention your concerns on the veracity and the factual content of an article but you DO NOT make outright statements to ascert your authority in discrediting information without absolute proof to back you up. Now, you were about to show me the proof as to why I should believe you guys over guys like this? NO? haven't got any? Well now I have the right of reply. Unless your info can be confirmed as being the 'real deal' and mine not, just reply as intrigued consumers. Not as topical experts.

Well I can tell you that there is no video on the David Icke YouTube channel with the title 'Was Hitler a Rothschild?'; nor any other video on his channel with similar terms.
I couldn't even find a single video on his channel with 'Hitler' in the title.
If you can't post links, and you can't even name a video properly what exactly do you want us to do?

Do you want us to quickly scurry and trawl the internet for something you saw somewhere?
Start screaming and throwing paperwork everywhere calling loved ones to tell them to grab the kids and precious belongings and head for the hills?

So what IF you're right?
You're a bit late to the party.
Rothschild (sold his holdings first, creating a panic-sell and then bought it all back for pennies on the pound, he basically scammed all the other investors with insider knowledge)
But this happened 200 years ago.
And the Third Reich was in the 1930's, it's now 2017.

We have computers and crytocurrency now...

If you're gonna go learning all this stuff you gotta learn to keep your feet on the ground...
Keep it all in the right perspective, you know.
I see 'all new' crazy and ridiculous stuff every single day...

AC, I wrote 'I can't link but here is the title, Google it'. I said nothing about videos. Surely your not OK with scamming, whether 100 years ago or 100 years from now? What he did was WAY beyond any kind of traditional trading techniques, of any age. Now humour me one more time and google the title I mention. Not You tube. I only ask that I be given the same considerations as you afford someone who posts comments you agree with. Remember WE don't know the truth so we have to rely on what we hear, see and read. Beyond that, all we have is faith in the truth and our fellow man.