The Forum > General Discussion > SSM and Bad Reporting
SSM and Bad Reporting
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
-
- All
Toni, what are you on? I was referring to Maggot Zs&^*%$ski, not father Brennan. Again another example of the YES camp in action. Did I mention Fr Brennan? No! I've got the YES camps MO now so don't bother trying to respond, your comments are moot.
Posted by ALTRAV, Saturday, 28 October 2017 8:36:37 AM
| |
ALTRAV,
If you going to single out groups for what you think is - "disgusting" behaviour in this country regarding how they should be treated under the law - then there's going to be very few people left. But thankfully that's not how the law should work. Every single Australian gay or straight deserves to be treated equally in the eyes of the law and in the eyes of our society. You may not support same-sex marriage - (for whatever reason) but surely you can support civil partnerships and contractual relationships? That is all that's being asked in this postal survey. Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 28 October 2017 9:25:38 AM
| |
Foxy, The survey might be just asking one question. But it implies that the whole of society must recognise SSM is equal to heterosexual marriage. With that goes the teaching of children of this equality as is currently happening from infant schools as normal family; right through to Safe Schools in senior high
Posted by Josephus, Saturday, 28 October 2017 12:14:23 PM
| |
Dear Josephus,
No. this is not a competition as to which relationship is superior or inferior. This is about granting same-sex couples civil partnerships and contractual relationships under the law of the land because every single Australian gay or straight deserves to be treated equally in the eyes of the law and currently the gays are not. They are not asking for churches to marry them. They are asking to be able to have civil ceremonies. That's all. Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 28 October 2017 1:36:10 PM
| |
//I was referring to Maggot Zs&^*%$ski, not father Brennan.//
//Their conduct, (all of them) is disgusting.// Fr. Brennan is part of the yes camp. So when your refer to 'all of them', you necessarily refer to Fr. Brennan. //Again another example of the YES camp in action.// Correct, Fr. Brennan is another example of the YES camp in action. //I've got the YES camps MO// Ticking a box on a postal survey? Sounds suspiciously similar to the NO camp's MO. Posted by Toni Lavis, Saturday, 28 October 2017 2:20:37 PM
| |
The thing is equality is reversed with SSM.
See:http://www.christianconcern.com/our-issues/education/court-rules-student-can-be-expelled-for-quoting-bible-on-facebook?utm_content=buffer4ae1f&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer Posted by Josephus, Saturday, 28 October 2017 2:24:33 PM
|