The Forum > General Discussion > The Remarkable Mr Ludlum
The Remarkable Mr Ludlum
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Page 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- ...
- 35
- 36
- 37
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Greens leader Richard Di Natale, who was sorely let down by both deputies, admitted that the Greens need to improve governance.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-18/citizenship-issues-in-parliament-how-does-this-keep-happening/8721012
Richard Di Natale's meaning is clear, Greens candidates cannot be trusted to do it themselves. But these are candidates, parliamentarians, Senators, who are trusted with deep State AND COMMERCIAL secrets and the confidential information of ordinary citizens. They are also paid very highly for their responsibilities. That is obviously whether they take those responsibilities seriously or not.
Of course the political spin to protect them and hopefully buff them up for a later Lazarus-like return would be trying to reverse the situation by casting them as the innocent victims of a cruel 'technicality' of the Constitution.
However, while in the bubble that might sound like plausible deniability, or whatever the current leftist-speak is for outright lies, the public will not be having a bar of it and yes, absolutely yes, the public will remember them as not to be trusted.
Sarah Hanson-Young, Senator for South Australia, cut a sweet deal to pay back travel money to which she was not entitled. Politicians from other Parties have had to pay back debts too.
The public need to be assured that, since they haven't offered themselves, Ludlam and Waters will be required to make fair recompense to Government. Even then, they could expect far better treatment than an ordinary member of the public who would be slammed with a penalty, interest on the gross and threat of debt collection and trashing of credit rating.