My often stated idea that sending children to school at too earlier an age prompts children to self-program incorrect behaviours, hyperactive opioid self-inducing behaviours to reduce awareness/medicate unwanted to feel mental stress, forced upon children by school teachers early aged academic learning. School lessons preoccupation with spelling and maths, cut short/reduce children's adult understanding memorising of wise mature learning from everyday life experiences opportunities. Schooling's desire to control children's time to think out simple tasks, quickly scanning memories for many spelling words and number calculations, children by days end are mentally exhausted from spelling and number crunching. The same hurrying behaviours on repetitive tasks, limits creating more memories which merely are added to each days schooling tasks.

Television's simple similar ideas on children's programs, children limited to selected programs having simple bible lesson moral ideas good defeating evil, hyperactive movement induce a sense of awareness to adrenalin excitement, leading children's self-programming to favouring simple intelligence adrenalin inducing activities, competition. That many children participate for the sake of winning, not being a loser, rather than learning better performing hands on skilled performance information. Winning, feeling adrenalin, opioid rewarding regardless how child-intelligent simple activities are, holds human behaviours Neanderthal.

My idea that allowing children to calmly develop physical movement seeing movement working to their advantage, long before attempting academic learning difficult to prove information is true, seeing physical movement and everyday complex mechanical movement seeing motor vehicles, predicting where motor vehicles move mild opioid towards, allows correct balance within brain chemical rewards, that wisdom on what fear actually provides, what fears to acknowledge what fears are to be ignored, what opioid stimulates actually have rewarding incentives compared to unwise stimulates that merely entertain adrenalin pumping pointlessness.

Children bored with morning cartoons begin to watch adult morning information programs. Smiling hosts laughing at few understood by children mumbled out of context reasons, frequent fast moving little point commercials, predominately ABC introduced political commentators expressing easy to understand leadership battles, children soon believe democracies are real not hearing any memorable policies, default learn to leave real information to politicians same as children leave religious scripts to religious clergy. Childhood emotional desires to progress, children feel realistically informed, believing what's heard is true, where what's really being heard are simple to understand fabricated “as it happened” stories, lies.

Primary teachers asking children if they watched morning programs on selective interested to teacher stories, exampling dinosaurs and NASA space probes, children not wanting to miss out on classroom competitive teacher questioning begin to watch teachers selected morning programs, watching political stories along with dinosaur and space probe stories.

Morning program hosts smiles and laughter presentations aids programming young aged citizenry into excepting democracies are real, allowing future politicians easy access to telling lies as excuses for economic declines.

…............... US Police Shootings …...........

Any person old enough to remember Peter Sellers movies, Inspector Jacques Clouseau, name sounding “clueso” indicating clueless detective inspector. Movies began with a pink panther short man with a magnifying class cartoon. Inspector Clouseau movies were Peter Sellers most often repeated movies on television up until late last century.

After Peter Sellers died, a Joanna Lumley documentary/movie devoted asking questions to Peter Sellers Inspector Clouseau movie actors and actresses, including David Niven. Questions asked were more related to the character idea of Inspector Clouseau. I remember Joanna Lumley interviewing one actor the sidekick of the chief inspector Charles Dreyfus whom character Charles Dreyfus was constantly trying to discredit inspector Clouseau due to Clouseau clumsy hurried analogies, yet, wrong analogies turned out correct, used to allow inspector Clouseau to receive recognition for his clumsy good deeds.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084814/?ref_=nmbio_mbio

As I strongly remember, Joanna Lumley was interviewing chief inspector sidekick, she made a statement that “Clouseau saved us from our selves”.

During other media expressing media similar bible story prompts “Apocalypse is coming” comments at the time, Jesus was said to represent an idea of human sacrifice, “Jesus saved us from ourselves” in that Jesus parable story represents human sacrifice so the living can have a better life, also stated by John Howard directly before or during early 1999.

Putting hinted meanings together, inspector Clouseau was clueless, inspector Clouseau represented police force's clueless training, graduated police pointing guns at people in fear of being shot, pulling the trigger in defence of being shot. That people being shot died so remaining living people may have a better life, because, humanity generally reproduce more children than to merely replace existing populations. So Jesus representing peasantry, peasantry having many children, Jesus/peasantry deaths saves us from ourselves, over population.

In 1999 the reasons many media listeners were convinced to take money out of banks, bury money, having much of the money stalked and stolen, was due to media guests (my media listening being Radio National Monday and Tuesday morning Life Matters) stated soon assassins were going to murder people over the age of 60 years, mentioning that too many elderly people on retirement benefits wasn't going to work. That government (James Bond 007 licensed to kill movie prompts) assassins were leaving murder scenes to clueless police, police forced by political systems to find murderers, forcing clueless police into framing innocent people beginning with single males for murder, merely because police fear being fired, police knowing by remaining in police employment, police have protection from accusations of murder by other police in need of someone to accuse of murder.

Peter Sellers having died, Several more inspector Clouseau movies were produced, one Clouseau actor being Steve Martin, continued emphasis on clueless police stories.

Police Academy movie series of stupid incompetent police academy recruits, added to the ideas of 1999 thereafter poorly trained incompetent police used to murder and/or arrest people for murders they didn't commit. In 1999, so many murders said by media suggestions would happen, media statements (comprehensive listening over a period would have understood) to be committed, there being so many angry people wanting revenge, many angry people sitting on juries, wasn't going to be difficult to execute convicted murderers.

Years of media crime stories Murder She Wrote, many war movies and documentaries, Vietnam War described as a police action, individual assumed thought on population control why wars exist, etc... not beyond understanding to why 1999 police were going to arrest single people first, advised by RN guest, best to remove money from banks, sell all property as hiding away from police, hiding people will have all property confiscated. Bury money in parks before escaping to places which have few to no police, Mad Max movie series escape from an Apocalypse event hiding in a desert. Bus load of homosexuals, men alternative dressed as women movie travelling into a desert, easily explained media as hiding from police persecution.

Childhood television programming school clumsy/clueless student hurrying programmed US police to shoot first and ask questions later, US police sensitive to crime, recently shot an Australian woman, god being what happens, god's chosen one, Jesus on the cross, sacrifice so remaining living people can have a better life, broadly stated in context by John Howard in around early 1999.

Many movie stories containing violent action scenes resemble Moses bible stories, desensitises human acceptance to violent deaths and/or explains what's going on for another future Apocalypse scare, and existing Doomsday Preppers getting ready for same ideas mentioned above.

Recent police shooting, ABC television news quest states “540 police deaths this year alone”.

Politically: in a democratic two party system, voters choose between a bad political party and a worse than bad political party. In a global context, young and old citizenry see democracies are bad, media portray North Korean dictatorship and Russian fake democracy, accused of assassinating opposition to dictator government journalists as worse than bad democracies. All good propaganda.

Democracy governments can do bad things to citizenry, blaming clueless governing childhood competition intelligence two person leadership battle arguing... for declining economic and society social well being environments. Media merely mention “as it happened” events, rather than value added Australia solving problems.

260 federal politicians talk is about Abbott and Turnbull limited choices.

Gotten away with due to childhood limited beliefs.

steve101

Justine Damond's death having been shot by a two years of experienced police officer, Minneapolis Chief of Police addressing journalists stating, both police officers failed to turn on their vest cameras. As police officers were not thought to be intending to kill innocent people, police officers not turning vest cameras on, must be for many police officers a regular habit. Why have vest cameras if cameras aren't turned on? That this would not be the first time police officers had not turned cameras on, that courtroom cases would have: police captains; police commissioners; chief of police; Judges; defence lawyers... aware cameras aren't being turn on, that court justice systems are relying on police officers verbal testament and/or officers own written down notes often presented as evidence by prosecution lawyers (whose job is to get accuse by police guilty as charged) without having been supplied with camera archived video. Can't see non-existent video evidence same as not being able to see introduced (my accusation of non-existent) DNA fairytale evidence created reports.
I speculate, emotional and/or career based decisions are made behind closed doors, introduced creative arguments and/or withheld evidence guides establishment's desired outcomes. Exampling a new prison is opening soon, how can increased crime fill the newly opened prison? Creating increased legal services income earning turnover.

Legal court system established habits favouring police testamentary rather than police being questioned using police's archival video. The lack of real evidence allows police officers words to govern an accused person's guilt alone, particularly on how illegal drugs were found or planted on accused persons and any resistance to arrest was verbally perceived indicating accused persons had something to hide. When police officers do something wrong, police officers can withhold words, twist words to suit police officers and legal profession's own purposes. When accused of wrong doing people can spend long durations in jail, having police vest cameras turned off should allow grounds for cases against accused people of criminal activities be dismissed from court judgement.