The Forum > General Discussion > What Should Be In OUR Treaty ?
What Should Be In OUR Treaty ?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Page 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- ...
- 33
- 34
- 35
-
- All
Posted by Foxy, Friday, 9 June 2017 6:44:28 PM
| |
Hi Foxy,
Surely you would be aware that memory, oral recollection, is - as Leoj points out beautifully - not particularly reliable. Haven't you ever had disputes with siblings, etc., about something that you or they were SURE had happened and in a certain way, only for them to disagree ? Surely you, like the rest of us, have embroidered stories from the past, only to find independently that the realities were somewhat different ? We all do it. Imagine this going before a court: any judge would suggest that oral testimony, based on memory , is nowhere near enough as far as evidence goes. IF it is backed up by some independent evidence, say written records, and especially evidence from different and independent sources, then maybe the whole package could constitute evidence. But not oral memory on its own. We've surely witnessed how difficult this is in the cases of Rolf Harris and Bill Cosby ? Yeah, I think those bastards are guilty as hell, BUT I'm not the judge, and emotion very much creeps in there, a sense of betrayal of their public images by a couple of sleaze-bags. But I think I'm wasting my time. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Friday, 9 June 2017 7:30:30 PM
| |
Joe (Loudmouth),
On 26 May 1997 the landmark "Bringing Them Home" Report was tabled in Federal Parliament. The Report was the result of a national inquiry that investigated the forced removal of Aboriginal children from their families. The Report was a vital step in the healing journey of many Stolen Generation members. It was the first time their stories were publicly acknowledged. It was also the first time it was formally reported that what governments did to these children was inhumane and the impact has been life-long. A 1994 survey by the Australian Bureau of Statistics stated that one in every ten (10%) Aboriginal people aged over 25 had been removed from their families in childhood. A figure which seems to be confirmed by research since the "Bringing Them Home Report." Australian numbers are in the tens of thousands. I suggest that you try to get hold of that Report. It just may clarify things for you. Although I suspect I am wasting my time. Posted by Foxy, Friday, 9 June 2017 11:36:34 PM
| |
Foxy,
Do you understand what self-reporting is? How did the ABS get its data? That inquiry, how did it get its data? Did anyone ever cross-check with the damned reliable government records? If not, why not? -Since it must have been obvious that the records exist. Questions that anyone who is at all interested in balance, make that the facts, would be demanding answers to. Posted by leoj, Saturday, 10 June 2017 2:00:45 AM
| |
Hi Foxy,
The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission was given specific terms of reference by the Attorney General to thoroughly investigate all the relevant material and I quote "past laws, practices and policies which resulted in the separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families by compulsion, duress or undue influence, and the effects of those laws, practices and policies;" It was not a speculative fishing expedition, as some try to suggest, but a properly conducted inquiry. If the findings had suited the mind set of the "deniers" they would have accepted it with gusto, but since it did not go their way, they now try to denigrate it as nothing but useless nonsense. On this thread Joe and Leo, using the words of Leo, its unacceptable "self-reporting". Yet on the Andrew Bolt thread the same pair were quick to accept, without evidence, Bolt's self-reporting of his so called assault by in Bolts words "left wing Fascists". Maybe they only accept self-reporting, which btw was not the only basis for the report, when it suits their mind set on the particular issue. Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 10 June 2017 6:32:41 AM
| |
Dear Paul,
There's not much more to say. We know that few records of stolen children were kept, that some were deliberately destroyed or lost. That some administrators tried to tout their "successful assimilation" of Aboriginal people by deliberately understating the Aboriginal children's numbers thus distorting data. Between 1883 and 1969 we're told that more than 6,200 children were stolen in NSW alone. I'll repeat again that the 1994 survey by the ABS stated that one in every ten (10%) Aboriginal people aged over 25 had been removed from their families in childhood. This figure which seems to be confirmed by research since the "Bringing Them Home" Report. Australia wide numbers are in the tens of thousands. Anyway, I have no wish to argue any further. There's no point. Before I go I shall leave on a more positive note by giving you the link of a speech that the famous journalist Jeff McMullen made. It lifted my spirits - hopefully it will do the same for yours. It's worth a read: http://newmatilda.com/2017/06/04/after-mabo-koikis-vision-for-a-new-great-society/ Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 10 June 2017 11:20:10 AM
|
I've been described as a lot of things - but "stupid"
has not been one of them - until now.