Foxy,

Considering that just about every link you provide is an opinion piece from a news organisation that is well left of centre you are unlikely to find an opinion that differs from yours. Obviously you are content to live in an echo chamber sealed from the views of the real world. The moment you condemn all the MSM then you know you are living on the fringe.

Dear Shadow Minster,

The day that you vary your opinions and sources
will be the day that I shall take you seriously.
Until then - before you criticise any one else
look to fixing up yourself and your own behaviour
on this forum

cont'd ...

BTW: I do not condemn all the MSM.
As my posting record shows. I quote
from a wide variety of sources.

Hi my sweet little cuddly pie... Joe,

Unfortunate Foxy and I seem to be at a distinct disadvantage in this argument. Our problem is we will have to admit that we are not the learned judges that obviously you, and several others from the rabid right must be, thoroughly equated with all the legal facts in this particular case as you are, forget I said that, bugger it, who needs legal niceties when there is a public hanging in the offer, you mob would do the infamous Judge Jeffreys proud.

Alas, all Foxy and I can offer is, and I quote Foxy here;

"people who break our laws should
be punished. They should have the full force of the
law brought down upon them. What that will be exactly
will be up to the courts to decide - depending on their
crime "

I know the above would never satisfy Judge Jeffreys, and the members of the peanut gallery here, as it doesn't mention, to be hung, drawn and quartered, (please forgive our pussyness on that score) but possibly it may satisfy you.

Love and Kisses Paul.

Please, Paul, I'm not like that :(

Wow, you do get a bit rabid when you have no argument. Going to extremes won't cut it.

I'm certainly not assuming the mantle of a judge, simply asking what might the parameters be that are available to any government, when dealing with a fascist murderer and rapist.

But if you wish to defend him, no matter what he's done, that's your prerogative in a free society. I most respectfully disagree with your championing of the fascist murderer Prakash as some sort of pseudo-left-wing poster-boy.

By the way, he can't be hanged, that's not legal any more in Australia: as it happens, back in 1967, I joined the campaign against the hanging of the last person to be executed, Ronald Ryan, partly because I believed he wasn't guilty. As it turned out, much later, he wasn't.

Of course, in this case, and no doubt in future cases of returning terrorists, we are in somewhat unprecedented penal territory: obviously Prakash can't be just allowed to enjoy life in the company of other criminals, he would be far too corrupting. So what do governments do ? You refuse to recognise these problems, but again, that's your prerogative [see above].

All I am proposing is that such fascists would need to be jailed for life (that's not too much to ask, surely) and kept in complete isolation for the duration. The most obvious places seem to be somewhere well out in one of our many deserts: we really are spoilt for choice there. Perhaps, out of the government's humanitarian bent, there should be no fences (there may not need to be) but it would regrettable if some murdering and raping thug like Prakash was shot while obviously trying to escape.

Do the crime, do the time.

Thanks for the love and kisses but really, you've got the wrong bloke.

Joe

Hi Joe,

<<I'm (Joe) certainly not assuming the mantle of a judge,>> You did say "So clearly they would have to locked away for life" you went as far a nominating a couple of places "north of Oodnadatta or west of Betoota" That seem rather judgmental.

<<But if you (Paul) wish to defend him, no matter what he's done, that's your prerogative in a free society>> I don't wish to defend him, unlike the prosecutors on here, I would make a lousy defense lawyer. I will say no matter what Prakash is/has been proven guilty of, he like everyone else is entitled to a defense. In a free society you, like so many others, can express your 'lynch mob' mentality, but I believe in the rule of law, if we do not have a ordered judicial system then we have anarchy, Is that what you want?

<<I (Joe) most respectfully disagree with your championing of the fascist murderer Prakash as some sort of pseudo-left-wing poster-boy>> Absolute crap Joe, you are talking rubbish. There is nothing posted by Foxy or myself that would suggest that to be the case what so ever! I humbly and respectfully ask you to post evidence that we did, if not then shut the you know what up!

<<obviously Prakash can't be just allowed to enjoy life in the company of other criminals, he would be far too corrupting. So what do governments do? Obviously, they listen to you and build a prison out in the Simpson Desert, and make you the Commandant. Or they do what governments should do, and listen to experts in theses matters and take their advice. Are you an expert on these matters? Remember Rudolf Hess, he ended up in a one man spua max prison.

"Shot while escaping" Didn't the Nazi's use that line a lot? I can see guard Is Mise loading his trusty blunderbuss right now.

"Thanks for the love and kisses but really, you've got the wrong bloke" Oh well, can't win em' all. I hope you and your true love are happy together, we are!