Nathan,

I'm not the slightest bit interested in Goochwhoochi's background. She is a totally unnecessary addition to Australia's population, and should not be a politician. We now have to even pay the useless woman because she is now a politician. I should not, and will not, look at her from a 'wider' (your) perspective.

Legs bitten off! Crocodiles, Koalas and lizards! The Seekers. What on earth are you talking about.!

A huge challenge! The damn woman has had it handed to her on a plate, and she hasn't done a bloody thing to earn it.

AJ again display hypocrisy beyond belief. The number of times you have misrepresented Scripture would be difficult to keep count of.

Your High Priest Darwin was a bigoted racist. He fully believed that blacks were less evolved. Your denial can't change facts. Darwin's pseudo science (now known as a joke) led to much racism.

Ha! You are Leigh, ttbn. I knew it!

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/user.asp?id=19626

I told you I’d get it one day. A very belated welcome back, too, by the way.

Sheesh, and will ya look at all those [Deleted for abuse] posts towards the end there. It’s no wonder your new nom de plume stands for Try to be Nice.

You should start putting that into action some day.

--

That’s the Tu quoque fallacy, runner. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque)

<<The number of times you have misrepresented Scripture would be difficult to keep count of.>>

Incidentally, could you give an example of this? No? That’s alright. I didn’t think you could.

Your actions were still dishonest, by the way.

<<Your High Priest Darwin was a bigoted racist.>>

This is the Association fallacy. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy) Darwin's racism says absolutely nothing about the truth of evolution.

Two fallacies in a mere 53 words. That's some acheivement, runner, even for you!

' Darwin's racism says absolutely nothing about the truth of evolution.'

AJ's logic

the paedophile priest (usually homosexual) perversion says nothing about Catholicism.

btw AJ still waiting for the slightest proof for such a failed theory. Surely you god deniers can come up with something a little rational.

No, runner, that’s not analogous in any way to what I said about Darwin’s racism.

<<the paedophile priest (usually homosexual) perversion says nothing about Catholicism.>>

The truth status of a proposition is not analogous with the reputation of an oragnisation. Apples and oranges.

Also, Matthew 7:20.

<<btw AJ still waiting for the slightest proof for such a failed theory.>>

How can you still be waiting? You’ve never asked for evidence before. Despite that, however, I’ve still provided you with plenty. Unfortunately, though, you always disappear when I do. But if you want evidence now, then how about we start here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCayG4IIOEQ

I’d be fascinated to hear your response. I bet you can’t make it all the way through the video.

' No, runner, that’s not analogous in any way to what I said about Darwin’s racism.'

again wrong AJ. Very good analogy. Its amazing that a city could be named after such a racist bigot. He is still revered by god denies despite his pseudo science leading to much racism. Evolution is a fantasy. To deny your Creator you must walk around with your eyes shut. You simply use pseudo science as an excuse to deny the obvious.