The Forum > General Discussion > 'Racist' comments about new Family First Senator
'Racist' comments about new Family First Senator
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Page 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
<<again wrong AJ.>>
You’re jumping all over the place here. Are you capable of just sticking to, and exploring, one accusation at a time here? Sheesh, you’re like a kid with ADHD.
<<Very good analogy.>>
Okay, this is where you were also supposed to explain why it was a good analogy. You don’t know why, do you? You’re just going to assert that it was, despite my explanation as to why it wasn’t.
I’m still waiting for your example of my “misrepresenting Scripture”, too, by the way. Or have you given up on that one already?
<<Its amazing that a city could be named after such a racist bigot.>>
Not really, given that virtually everyone those days was racist. However, not all racists discovered the mechanism by which life evolved.
<<He is still revered by god denies despite his pseudo science leading to much racism.>>
Again, racism is discredited by evolution. So is eugenics. This is the Association fallacy again.
<<Evolution is a fantasy.>>
Still waiting for your opinion on the video, too. Or have we given up on that one as well?