The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Sharia Law is coming (or is that forbidden?)

Sharia Law is coming (or is that forbidden?)

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. ...
  12. 30
  13. 31
  14. 32
  15. All
Paul,
Obviously you have no clue about what true religion is about. It defines human society and our individual responsibilities to that society. If you think true Christianity is about incense then you are ignorant, and should remain silent about making judgments of its worth.
Posted by Josephus, Thursday, 13 April 2017 3:17:05 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
As regards the slaughtermen, well their union complained quite a long
while back about their members being sacked because they were not moslem.
They got nowhere as far as I remember and all slaughterman were sacked.

As regards the 2%, well if that makes you happy live with it.
Just remember that in Europe it was 2% at one time.
Now they are losing control of their own cities.
Police there advise women not to go out alone especially at night and
if they are blonde to dye their hair black as moslem men have a thing about blondes.

Frankly, I suspect some on here do not realise the extent of crimes
of assault, rape, gang assault, police & ambos assault that is rife
in European cities. Why do you think tourism is falling in Paris ?
Imagine, ambos in Sweden have demanded combat gear, helmets body armour etc etc.
How long before they demand guns and combat training.

The whole idea of Islamification is to make Europe like the Middle East.
Posted by Bazz, Thursday, 13 April 2017 5:32:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
While we're on the subject of Shari'a by stealth, is it true that a man can have his four marriages sanctioned by a mosque/imam, even though in Australian law, he is married to only one of them, and just the boyfriend of the three others down the road ? And each of those wives/'girlfriends' may have all of their children paid for by the Australian welfare system ? Sweet.

Just a few years ago, any bloke whose girlfriend had a child had to pay for its maintenance. At most places I worked in, there was at least one bloke whose pay was being 'garnisheed', i.e. deductions taken out and sent on to the Dept of Social Security, to compensate for payments to single mothers who had claimed that he was the father of her child (and presumably if he admitted his starring role). In other words, fathers paid for their children.

When I worked in Indigenous student support, one good-looking young bloke knocked up at least three fellow-students within a year: one later wrote to me and asked for his address, since she could not get any benefit without naming him and getting him to admit to the paternity of her child. I don't know how she went.

Is this still the law ? I'm so out of touch with the modern world.

Joe
Posted by Loudmouth, Thursday, 13 April 2017 5:52:19 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Josephus,

Lets have a look at just one of the enlightened teachings of Christianity. Black people are the decedents of Ham, who sined against Noah. it was a common held belief by European Christians that Africans and their descendants were destined to be servants, and should accept their status as slaves which only fulfills the biblical prophecy.

According to The American Bible Society; (not an atheistic org at all)

Genesis 9:18–29 has been popularly understood to mean that Ham was cursed, and this understanding has often been used to justify oppression of African people, the descendants of Ham. In this view Ham offended his father, Noah, and because of this his descendants are also cursed, and Ham is presented as the father of African people.

A very simple question; Is the Bible wrong on this?
Posted by Paul1405, Thursday, 13 April 2017 8:28:48 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Genesis 9:18–29, was used by both European Christian slave owners and later White American slavers to justify their barbaric practices against Negros, even to the point that they believed they had the authority of God to exercise life and death decisions over slaves, including Muslim and other slaves they captured. This was the accepted belief by such notable people as slave owning Popes,
The long history of slavery and Christianity makes for very interesting reading. Josephus you should acquaint yourself with some of the home truths about Christianity, instead of making silly claims about its nonexistent virtues.

Its all still in your book.
Posted by Paul1405, Thursday, 13 April 2017 9:05:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I posted this on another thread however it is just as relevant here, addressing such issues as the failure of Western liberals to support Muslims who want to reform Islam,

Richard Dawkins 2017 -, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris & Ayaan Hirsi Ali

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3-tU4mHq_Y
Posted by leoj, Thursday, 13 April 2017 9:23:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. ...
  12. 30
  13. 31
  14. 32
  15. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy