The question goes begging : " Why was Bec Cody was standing to pee in the mens urinal at Sussex Inlet RSL in the first place ?" Is it a 'girly tough thing' that female Labor members are want to exhibit in impressing their bikie, MUA and CFMEU mates? Maybe she was emulating the 'Silver Budgie' and couldn't hold her last yard glass long enough to make it to the 'ladies room' ?

As any bronzed ANZAC will attest, it's a sign of manhood to drink copious quantities of amber fluid and hold on for as long as humanly possible...too bad about those Changi induced bladders though. Poor form on the builders behalf for putting the powder room 500 metres down the paddock.

I had a small plaster gnome out amongst the foliage in the backyard of our home in Darwin, which my family used to pee on if the main toilet was engaged. Does SBS and ABC want to do a story on why short people... oh me bad, sorry "height challenged folk" should be urinated on ?

Not a journalist or camera van to be seen.

Dear runner,

I didn't know that about SBS.

I must watch it more often.

Dear nicknamenick,

They weren't gay - they were bogans.
Which explains it all.

ttbn,

Are you happy about your negroid ancestors?

Labor's Bec Cody makes things up,

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/rsl-seeks-a-meeting-with-act-labors-bec-cody-after-her-attack-on-sussex-inlet-rsl-20170214-gud54e.html

Doesn't the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly have any remedies or even concern where a member deliberately misinforms it? Coward's Castle?

There is quite a heated competition in Labor for Juliar's crown for 'terminological inexactitudes', meaning outright lies. Shorten is an easy winner, too hard to beat.

The new euphemism for lies is 'alternative facts' and announced with that set face of the practised exponents of 'wobblies'.

Is Mise,

I have no knowledge of negroid ancestors. I suppose you are referring to the 'belief' that we all 'came out of Africa'? The only ancestors I am familiar with are: Scottish (half), English (a quarter) and German (a quarter).

Ever wondered why people living closest to the Equator are darker-skinned than those living further from it?

There is the obvious reason of climate to explain this. You and I (I assume that you are a white man) were never meant to live in this part of the world. Until we started meddling with nature and the natural way of things, mankind was living where he was meant to live.

Why? Some people believe God 'done it'. Some talk about Creation. Others, like me, don't have a clue, but it makes sense as a fact of nature: the right people being in parts of the world that naturally suits them. Since man has thrown off any thought of a higher being, thinking of himself as …. God, if you like … the world has gone mad. Mere humans now think that they can control nature. They think that they can change the climate. They think that they can make the arbitary decision that there is no such thing as race, even though the differences in people are as plain as the nose on their faces. They think that all people are equal – that they can live together happily. The fact that different people are not getting along very well in one place; the fact that all the claims about how we can control the climate have proven false – these things don't seem to matter to the manipulators and social engineers. So, they make up bulls..t, and people like you are sucked in.