The Forum > General Discussion > Would you vote for Trump or Hillary?
Would you vote for Trump or Hillary?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 5 November 2016 6:36:05 AM
| |
Paul,
So what? If I pointed out that equally deplorable groups such as ISIS and the greens supported Hillary would that make Hillary an ISIS or greens supporter? Scott Dumdum is so distraught at having to face another 12 days of parliament (for which he is being paid) that he has to retreat to his safe place under his bed. Perhaps they will call back sideshow Bob. Posted by Shadow Minister, Saturday, 5 November 2016 10:31:53 AM
| |
SM: would that make Hillary an ISIS or greens supporter?
It would if you watch this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRu3U-nwyhw&sns=em Important! Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 5 November 2016 12:50:54 PM
| |
Shadow, the difference is, what I say is fact, what you say is fiction. Being an arch conservative like The Donald you have difficulty telling the difference.
Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 5 November 2016 5:07:11 PM
| |
Paul,
Much of what you write is to needle others. Half truths lined up to draw fantasy conclusions, and some of it is complete bollocks. What makes it worse is that I think you actually believe it. I am no fan of Trump or of Hillary, but only the supremely naive would think that Trump's core constituency is of the ilk of the KKK, as if that were so his vote would be less than 10% not 40%. As I have said as far back as January, he is saying what many people want to hear, but have been too cowed by the PC brigade to admit. Even then, I expected Trump to flame out against a more moderate candidate such as Clinton, but had not anticipated Hilary's ability to self harm. It is the same reason that Hanson has in one fell swoop captured more than half the votes in the senate that the greens did. The idiocy of Triggs and her PC thought police is causing consternation in the public, and could see One Nation getting parity with the greens. Posted by Shadow Minister, Sunday, 6 November 2016 7:45:49 AM
| |
Shadow, all what I write is based on fact. You disagree with most of my points of view, but that in its self does not make it "needle", it just shows you to be a winger. You brought up the subject of WA Green Senator Scott Ludlam's health issue, noting what so ever to do with the American election. You were simply trying to needle me with an erroneous post.
Like most of the know it all's from the rabid right you cannot tolerate others opinions, seeing yourself as a member of the "born to rule" mob that is understandable. Donald Trump has the endorsement of the KKK. That is a fact. Posted by Paul1405, Sunday, 6 November 2016 11:56:45 AM
|
If I point out that the 'The Crusader' endorses The Donald you call it a cheap shot. If I was to say 'The New York Times' endorses Clinton, would that also be a cheap shot. What is the difference 'The Crusader' simply reflect The Donald's hard core constituency. Besides in some parts of the Deep South the KKK is positively respectable.
Shadow, as the master of the cheap shot you should know. Scott has been working tirelessly for the people of WA, and when he gets a little down, you imply he is ripping off the taxpayer. What a cheap shot! I accept your apology in advance.