I don't remember receiving my first printing press text book until primary school year 3, and than the book was used to copy paragraphs into text books during home work. During the 1960s, primary school home work was optional, which I never did. By the time I reached high school, the class grade I was in was so low class students were not asked to do homework nor any chalkboard copying. Students were believed to be leaving high school before year 10.

My accusations are that education systems are being used to keep working class dumb, using government budget concerns, capitalist efficiency competition between foreign counties globalisation needs propaganda anecdotal evidence. Anecdotal evidence mere words are believed because badly educated citizens are educated to believe what media tell citizens to believe. Citizens scan their existing judgemental memories for simple/quick feel good answers, rather than think to come up with new idea solutions and reasons.

The ABC and commercial broadcasting media limit debates on education to government funding. Never do I hear any complaints about the curriculum and/or real intelligent detailed discussions, having budget concerns banded from entering conversations other than one recent episode of The Drum, where a kindergarten teacher was allowed to complain about standardised testing requirements.
Even though media forum guest speakers begin to say student education has been studied to show that funding has not proven to improve student grades, soon someone will guide conversation back towards funding issues. Issues between private schools and public school funding, state government funding fairness.

Below transcript on below website relating to September 26, QandA:
“Ms Vanstone said education funding didn’t necessarily need to keep rising, but maybe just be better directed.” what's missing in the transcript is Tony Jones stopped Amanda Vanstone from continuing her statement. Amanda complained that she wasn't allowed finish what she was saying. Tony Jones said he “agreed” with Amanda, than Tony Jones lead the conversation back towards funding.
http://thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2016/09/26/amanda-vanstone-qanda-refugees/

http://www.facebook.com/abcqanda/videos/10153722161301831/

………...

Mental illness: mental depression; why people enter into drug addictions; crime statistics; illiteracy problems; unskilled labour problems; domestic violence; suicide; etc... media presented issue discussions are little more than awareness. I accuse the media of being of the establishment propaganda machine, by the way society problem issues are worsening, yet some people say the problems aren't worsening merely being pointed out more often. I say the reasons problems are being expressed by media is because listeners who always look on the bright side of life, who don't want to worry, judge the media as honest in exposing societies declining problems... I say, media are desensitising citizens future rebellious complaints. Desensitising, is like the fog in gradually boiling water example experiment. Also, if media said nothing about society's problem issues, media could be accused of covering up society's governments not solving problems. What media listeners get are governments are unable to solve too many problems.

Crime is caused by bad education: illiteracy; frustration; students' destroyed self-esteem, where students needing to bully other students to regain self-esteem; repressed anger, need to have fun to medicate mental stress, bipolar behaviours.

Teenagers having left school are difficult to train because of mental stress, made worse leading up to HSC. I accuse of being intentional sabotage, which teenagers' parents having poor intellectual skills, can't conclude to be deliberate sabotage.

The best I can find from psychology readings, that readings are soft/vague/short in accusing school education academic learning mental stress to be a significant cause of human mental health. That media don't pick up on the few psychology readings which point to school curriculum, is because such exposures will not support a long income earning career in media.

The mentioned above “The Drum” special episode on education, where a kindergarten teacher is complaining about standardised testing children. As a kindergarten teacher, she vaguely indicates that children are being traumatised.
Proceeding school year 2-to-12 number teachers, I assume would not want to teach children who are more intelligent than themselves.
As soon as intelligent students realise they could teach themselves by merely reading worthwhile books, teachers lose a need to have teachers controlling students. Teachers merely become no need to train expendable baby stitters.

I say, teachers are taught to teach badly, traumatising students... to allow students to move-on into each following year of schooling, traumatised by each year's schooling. Students traumatised by each previous year of schooling, each following year being forced to remember much the same curriculum subjects, student were forced to remember each previous year.

All the problems society suffers from: unemployment due to inadequate ability to learn work skills; mental illness; crime; drug addictions. All come from: early childhood bad schooling; hurrying before ideas are correctly learnt; long hours of boring tasks. Yet, without social problems, many employment opportunities pretending to control problems, fewer of those pretending to control problems employment needs would be available.

steve101.

I give the below reading a title... “Worrying”.

Coming back to chalkboard copying… Add, teachers classroom talking out ideas to students as though students were instantly remembering what was being said. Students having to take notice of teachers, increases students' own awareness of existing mental stress traumas. Students reactions to teachers can been seen in ABC production, “Revolution School”.

Children/students reading short sentences from a chalkboard, reader's internal voice, holding short term memories while feeling mental stress, copying short sentences into text books, etc. Mental stress awareness, I suggest feels similar to thought... thinking... I theorise sufferers of chalkboard copying and listening to teachers’ interruption/intermittent statements are repressing classroom prompted traumas, which in future will be mistakenly referred to as “worrying”.

Teachers standing in front of classroom students, talking at adult speed speech, giving out instructions, transcribing what some vaguely put meaning actually means, prompting listeners to remember ideas, adding more tasks to what are often overly worked students. Places increased traumising memories onto future prompted memory awareness.
What are often missing from information are adequate conceptual thought productive messages. Students can't realise what's not there to be realised.

If by myself talking at adult speed speech to people about my often mentioned ideas, I often hear in reply from listeners, “don't worry about it”.
I try to pass a message onto listeners’ awareness, merely to have listeners scan memories to find conflicting and/or void to compare with beliefs. The format in which messages are heard, that being direct concepts, leaves listeners thinking as though they were experiencing chalkboard copying and teachers added on tasking.

Badly educated brains can't keep up with complex information. People often can only understand easily heard many times before, quick to the point messages, aged 5 years prior to first attending school childlike wants and needs. Hence, why the greater majority of humans favour listening to easily understood sports and no need to think short sentenced entertainment productions. Eventually everything becomes no more than noise and/or quick judgements to soon be forgotten.

I find no new relevant information in sports. I watched “The Gilmore Girls” when the production was first broadcast. I recorded the program so when fast sentences were spoken, I could return to earlier points and re-hear sentences until I could correctly keep up with conversations. Gilmore Girls re-runs years later, I easily understand Gilmore Girls conversations on first hearing recorded playbacks.
I can understand Elementary's Sherlock Homes without having to return to previous points to listen once more, all with the sound turn down low, forcing myself to increase focus attention on the listening.
Listening to serious interviewing programs, I almost immediately stop listening, drifting my thoughts onto better thoughts. What I believe is lacking in serious programs are relevant conceptual messages.

I theorise much of what serious media are presenting are: destruction; wars scenes; floods, homes are inundated; problems are systemic; politicians appear on media programs to defend themselves against criticism and/or blame past government's failed programs; government budgets can't satisfy Gonski education requirements; Nauru human rights violation; royal commission verse parliament inquiry into greedy banks; costs of a plebiscite into guy marriage; Vocation education; renewable energy security; anything that failed, has to be blamed on some entity. In all the negative news story redirections from productive thoughts, leaving listeners ignorant of productive thoughts. Listeners thought patterns are easily prompted towards blaming something. Details on how things could prevent future problems are often not mentioned. Things are designed to fail, merely to allow future reporting on failed ventures.
Governments design introduced projects to fail, allowing new governments opportunities to blame previous governments for poor and/or failed outcomes.

Internet bullying and trolls are merely reflecting media/school teacher culture of criticism.
People not interested in rolled-over criticism are ignoring serious media.

First week in October 2006, ABC “Media Watch” host states Donald Trump has long ago discovered that people can't listen. Experts have stated Donald Trump can lie, make many mistakes, very few people care and/or are listening.

Not proficiently listening audiences are cheering in between short sentences, I say audiences are traumatised by school education and are whom tuned into media's one-liner short sentenced heard many times before negative comments. Media distractions from everyday boring work task traumas: soft sex; violence; fast action scenes; one line statements... on radio and visual media, many media selections, leave citizens unable to think for themselves past everyday tasks.

Political candidate audiences are fed negative statements against opposing candidates, because the culture of negativity is quickly understood, no thinking involved, no need to feel “worried”.

Monty Python's “Life Of Brian”, closing song, “always look on the bright side of life”, is an ideal descriptive reminder of what people do.
People don't want to worry... Once people have made a decision, decisions can be made because too much thought feels like worrying. To avoid feeling thought traumas, where a decision needs to be made, merely making a decision relieves emotional decision makers of having to think, to feel worried. Once having made a decision, having to change their mind about a decision, leads to having to worry about being wrong, feeling like they need to worry why previously made decisions were wrong, hence denial, blaming some other person and/or unforeseen event. The concept of risk, means investors need to think what risk is, therefore feel worried.
I often hear from people, that they don't want to worry, therefore I assume people who don't want to worry, merely quickly decide outcomes.

Donald Trump captures audiences attention by criticising Hillary Clinton, once audiences feel they understand, few voters change their minds, having to worry why previous beliefs were incorrect.