The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Welfare of Australia, Finger Pointing.

Welfare of Australia, Finger Pointing.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. 9
  9. Page 10
  10. All
Education's chalkboard copying and teachers adult speed speech instructions. Media's political: foreign policy; personal beliefs; bureaucratic mistakes; budget concerns... average traumatised citizens don't care to know, as to begin to attempt to understand, leads to feeling repressed childhood traumas.

Serious media programs are part of the problem of citizenry short attention spans. The difference between sports media to serious political rolled over topics past political leaders’ personality. Commentators shift between known concepts, allowing little more than conformation of what's already believed. Visual images are dull, listeners, including myself, attention span leads thoughts to better topics. I assume many people attempting to listen, drifting off to other thoughts, leads thoughts to become worrying, therefore many listening audiences never watch serious topic media.

All the above suggests extremely poor work skills, finger points directly towards government sponsored education and establishment sponsored media.

steve101.
Posted by steve101, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 11:50:48 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
VET FREE-HELP sudden cancellation, compared with Labor's insulation scheme and school halls.

How to describe VET FREE-HELP cancellation as something that started out with good intentions, which failed to work correctly. While in government, federal Liberal government bureaucratic system attempts to fix Labor's training scheme problems, only to have problems worsen. That vague ideas that Labor government passed poor formulated laws, has training course service providers suing government for compensation, that subsidised course service providers were merely offering educational training courses to any person regardless of language barriers. That, as this easy way to collect money became common knowledge to every witnessing person, that complaining students were not seeing courses fulfilled, to allow governments to be seen as morally responsible to allow a failing system to continue. In other words... government took the program to the limits of acceptability.

A major problem is government's long history of messing with labour service providing contractors. My accusations that government are religious, full of tricks and deceitful behaviours to maximise citizenry manipulation. Exampling the US vice president debate, journalists describe VP candidates presenting arguments as more of a cat fight, female journalist heard saying audiences are not being able to understand debate information. The real information poor listening audiences will perceive is the separation between candidates, greed for political power, to be a winner. I say the propaganda value is to convince audiences candidates are separate from each other. Candidates seen wanting to point out opposing candidate's illegal and immoral behaviours in order to gain voters confidence at voting booths to enter chosen candidates into political power.
Myself, saying that everything is a trick, education has prevented citizenry's ability to rethink my often argumentative possibilities.

The education minister anecdotal confession statement that federal education minister admits mistakes were made, blaming Labor for creating an unmanageable educational training system. Elderly, experienced legally advised bureaucrats would have known better. Yet, bureaucrats never seem to enter media blame game accusations. Changing governments allows changing policies, cancelling projects with few-to-no finger pointing towards bureaucrats for setting contractors up to fail.
Posted by steve101, Thursday, 6 October 2016 1:46:52 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Many years ago, I was asked to be involved with a large NSW state government project. A man I knew who had obtained employment with the state government, called me, asking if I would quote a state government building project. When I arrived on the building sight, he warned me that I may not want to work for the government as a contractor. He said there are four engineers who come and go. The four engineers ask contractors for things to be done... contractors do the work. The four men return, telling contractors they have changed their minds, wanting carried out work to be removed. The man I knew said they mess contractors around. The man told me the four engineers wanted me to have provided expensive engineered plans on what they wanted done at my own expense. I left, never to return. In the end, what was asked to have engineer plans drawn up, was never done.

I was asked to do another job, I knew a second man who was retired from the NSW state government employment, relating to description project which was needed to be done. He told me the government asks for many quotes, excepting the cheapest quote. After quoted jobs are completed, anything that doesn't come up to a perfect standard. Contractors are messed around with payment schedules until the job has passed some bureaucrats engineering standards.

The second man suggested I would be better off having nothing to do with government projects.
Posted by steve101, Thursday, 6 October 2016 1:48:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
My above mentioned examples, plus: Paul Keating's recession Australia had to have; my accusation about 1999 Apocalypse is coming, RN listeners advised to sell property, take money out of banks and bury money in parks, money stalked and stolen, threatening to murder me and others if we constantly keep telling people of establishment tricks; 2007-2008 GFC based on sub-prime S&P triple “A” rated 14% interest rate loans to Negro and Latino borrowers, bundled up into mortgage securities; Rudd Labor government insulation scheme subsidy sudden cancellation; Abbott Liberal government South Australia wind power subsidy sudden cancellation.
The first 5 books in the bible supposedly written by Moses, exampling confidence trickery cryptic stories.

Any intelligent people taking up government schemes, should realise schemes will eventually be cancelled, leaving many scheme service providers in debt and/or stuck with long term rent obligations.
Running subsidised schemes looks like government is doing a good job by creating employment. Yet, workers benefiting from subsidies find themselves in a boom/bust debt, a percentage of borrowers unable to service loans. Property prices fall, placing loan servicing remaining workers in negative equity. This is the communist argument to why capitalism fails and is often cruel to working classes. The capitalist argument is that capitalism creates/builds many good things.

I have mentioned 1870s New York mayor Boss Tweed and Tammany Hall. The only person known for going to jail was common working class Boss Tweed. The remaining benefiting Tammany Hall rich continued their wealth creation, uninterrupted.
A narrator on a recent SBS documentary on railways in north America, called the late 1800s New York rich, “robber barons”.

Recent constant media exposures of banks immoral behaviour are indicating media are doing their job in a democracy. Not mentioned prior to now, partially financed government training schemes are being mismanaged. How much establishment owned media redirections and government bureaucrats that are never mentioned and/or never accused of mismanaging finances, are involved in legally easy to steal money using capitalism government schemes?
Posted by steve101, Thursday, 6 October 2016 1:49:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Why I constantly keep coming back to (obvious to me) bad education, traumatising children's thinking processes, to allow never mentioned establishment to manipulate populations to believe what their told.

I tend to realise, the day ANZ bank admits mistakes, that media commentators will speculate that nothing will happen in the future that results from October 4,5 & 6, on a day, the minister for education makes his confessions. In the middle of the 3 days bank inquiry. Will the training scheme failure be rarely ever mentioned again?

….........................

On October 5, following federal government education minister, a guest ABC24 guest speaker made a short statement, that training future workers in working environments where workers could change employment skills 15 times in their careers, seems pointless. A percentage of trained students won't eventually find employment they were training for.

Another point was that bureaucrats making decisions on what students do for what courses, is questionable.
Exampling 2014 PBS Newshour programs. Several times, stories related to training trades college students were forced to do unrelated to desired outcomes course studying to gain course credits.

Many years ago, I suggested to university educated people that 50% of university curriculum subject studying, students were forced to study, had nothing to do with what students were attending university for.

My accusation is that bureaucrat system except all students, that education has to do with Darwinism survival of the fittest. Information has very little to do with real learning education. That mental stress not only traumatises students, examination results are more assessing whether students can function under mental stress. Because easy to remember trivial information being used for examination assessments, learning almost nothing is wasting time.
Posted by steve101, Thursday, 6 October 2016 1:51:32 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Because workers are living in more of an end of industrial age employment environment country, disposable, replacement rather repair everything society labour force, limited skilled thinking is no longer required. Even though employers ask for trained skilled employees, I suggest paying for training where many students whom have no thinking traumas, could merely look at tasks requiring training, seeing what was being done over a short period, zero traumatised people would soon excel in doing many skilled trade tasks.

Traumatised teenagers and adults finding tasks difficult to perform, allow people with no traumas a long term advantage over traumatised workers. Workers having no traumas soon realise repeated capitalist busts are intentional. Repeated busts regardless of media market forces excuses are soon assumed as lies.

The 1999 RN Life Matters guest speaker stated, governments don't like people who are a Jack of all trades.
The Apocalypse is coming is an attempt to use people who realise everything is a lie, confessing the many media lies, in order to gain trust, only to steal what accumulate assets can be deemed to be obtained.

School classroom government curriculum education literally “rapes” children of their inquisitive complex conceptual intelligence.

steve101
Posted by steve101, Thursday, 6 October 2016 1:55:39 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. 9
  9. Page 10
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy