The Forum > General Discussion > The Greens, Trots or Trolls of the Parliament?
The Greens, Trots or Trolls of the Parliament?
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- ...
- 49
- 50
- 51
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Ex-PM Gillard would agree with him. The always treacherous, headline grabbing, credit-taking Greens scuttled her chances, but Abbott was always given the credit for unseating her.
Most mature voters would admit that the Greens only demonstrate an interest in the environment at election time. After that, the lazy Greens just grandstand and are disruptive, wasting costly Parliamentary hours, days and sessions.
Keating,
<Greens self-serving Trots: ex-PM Keating
JUNE 25, 2016
Former prime minister Paul Keating has used a Labor rally to turn his caustic wit on the Greens Party, labelling it "a bunch of opportunists and Trots" splitting the progressive vote.['Progressive' - the necessary euphemism for International Socialism, which the Australian electorate rejects]
In his first public address of the 2016 election campaign, Mr Keating told the Sydney crowd the Greens were reducing Labor's ability to form government.
"They're a protest party, not a party of government, but their game is to nobble the party of government that can actually make changes," Mr Keating said.
"You can't be a government when you've got a bunch tearing away at you, trying to pinch a seat here and there, all to make themselves look important."
..
"
"They purloined the name Greens. We're more green than they are," he said".>
That doesn't bode well for another hung Parliament.
Opportunists Trots or Time-Wasting Trolls, that the media and particularly the ABC do not hold to account? Or misunderstood?