The Forum > General Discussion > Does Australia Need A New Flag?
Does Australia Need A New Flag?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Page 20
- 21
-
- All
Posted by Paul1405, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 10:55:57 AM
| |
It isn't a question of whether Australia needs a
new flag. It is a inevitable. Simply a question of when! Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 10:58:16 AM
| |
Well Paul1405 and ors, why didn't the the Labor+Greens sidekicks governments of Rudd->Galah'd->Rudd again, take any action? They were in power in Canberra for the long years from 2007 to 2013.
They presided over the 'Struggle Streets' identified by the 'fact-finding' ABC but did nought as well. Ex-Labor Leader Mark Latham would know and he had this to say, <Former Labor leader Mark Latham Slams Labor over Gay Marriage FORMER Labor leader Mark Latham has slammed his party’s “obsession” with gay marriage saying it should focus on the nation’s “Struggle Streets” instead. He told 3AW radio Bill Shorten’s private members bill to push for changes to the marriage act to allow same-sex couples to tie the knot, to be introduced into parliament on Monday, was nothing more than a symbolic gesture. He said the biggest social issue facing Austalia was unemployment, drug use and homelessness in suburbs such as Mt Druitt which was the focus of the SBS documentary, Struggle Street. “If you are interested in equality and social justice in Australia then what was the really big event in the month of May,” he said. “We had the Struggle Street documentary which revealed that in the nation’s public housing estate, most notably in Mt Druit people live in conditions that you wouldn’t wish upon your dogs. Absolute chaos, despair and hopelessness in their lives. “And surely, you would have expected a serious national response from the party of social justice? “We didn’t hear anything. “They’re obsessed, instead, by gay marriage.”> http://tinyurl.com/Gays-Labor-obsession Interfering in the private life of gays, trashing the Marriage Act, dumping the flag, the republic NOW! are all smokescreens, diversions for Labor's International Socialists. Labor has no policies and Shorten is frozen in fear, refusing to do anything about the CFMEU and other union heavies, by whose dead-hand he won and holds down his leadership. Posted by onthebeach, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 11:32:00 AM
| |
Foxy,
"The dominant top left quadrant belongs to the flag of another nation, making Australian symbolically subordinate to Britain. That is an anachronism." and the same set up in the Hawaiian flag makes Hawaii symbolically subordinate to Britain. Would that not be the perception of people who do not know that Hawaii is a USA state? What an anachronism for the Hawaiians to have to suffer. Posted by Is Mise, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 11:48:03 AM
| |
Dear Is Mise,
We've covered this topic earlier. Hawaiians look at things differently. Read the link I gave earlier. Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 12:20:20 PM
| |
Dear Aidan
Isambard Kingdom Brunel was just another engineer like you. PS Obviously you don't understand how the Chinese kinship system works. But then that's to be expected because you're just an engineer. Posted by Mr Opinion, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 2:15:13 PM
|
Fiji's PM Frank Bainimarama said "The current exercise was a quest for a flag that represents who we are today, rather than our past".
New Zealand, which also has the Union Jack on its flag, will hold a binding referendum next year on whether to change it, with conservative Prime Minister John Key favouring a new design.
Is it time Australia should make such a move.