Time to revise your meaningless figures, Steve: Sherlock Holmes's house was 221B Baker Street.

Above introduced presented version of Pythagoras numerology, coming from my share market spread sheet:

“David Bowie” is 594; “market stocks down” is 594; “market stocks all week head down” is 594. “dav” is 589; “market downturn” 598; “shocking” is 985; “shares sell off markets falling” is 985.

“Essendon” is 615; “market shares sell off” is 516.

Warnings of share market falling are a week late. David Bowie name may be an intentional lettered stage name to be numbered by people who are aware of the numerology. David Bowie recently released an album. Is David Bowie really dead or his career has ended with a fake death.
Regardless, readers can't trust establishment people.

Suburb names could have been named to letters to suit financial short numerology sentences?

My intentions are to convince how many things are lies. That media are not working class individual worker's best friends. The media is controlled by the establishment for reasons of: entertaining distraction; dummying information, rolling over simple ideas; and misinformation. Getting people to believe ideas that are faked concepts: democracy; finance, replacing once forced upon religion.

The numerology is Not shown by myself to encourage market speculation using numerology systems.

On the Sunday Morning of January 17, 2016. ABC1 television repeated a 2014 copyright, Post World War Two history, entitled “Making Australia Great: Inside Our Longest Boom”.

“Inside Our Longest Boom” may hint that the 2014 and 2015 boom has finally ended. That booms with long periods of busts are the normal long term economic system.

Paul Keating stated, “the post war long wave of growth runs from 1947 to 1974... and the next long wave runs from 1982 to 2007”. Whether his opinion is correct or not. In 1977 stated a post WW2 baby boom generation land and or property buying boom prompted by increasing land values. 1982 was suggested to be the beginning of DOW Jones Industrial share market climb stated by Paul Kangas of the once shown US Nightly Business Report.

This documentary is a must see for anyone whose born in the late 20th century, believing they understand democracy. By the time viewers finish watching this documentary, viewers shouldn't consider that they clearly understand anything. This documentary is more a history of excuses... montage of quick flashed known faces. Hurrying past several memorable ideas.
Many people will be turned off taking any future notice on political history as the presented quickness may resemble school education hurried tasks.
Many people don't care about politics, including myself. Politics are pointless personal go no where events.

The documentary easy idea that “The more economic leavers are adjusted by political party leaders”, the more working class people lose personal wealth.

This documentary shifts between politicians and one entertainer' Frank Sinatra visiting Australia in 1974. What's Frank Sinatra doing in understanding 1970s economy other than mentioning Australian unions, Bob Hawke brokering solutions and or 2008 Global Crises?

Media shifting between retired politicians that sound like they're providing relevant information, information is more like commenting on personal remembered irrelevant events as though narrators historical stated events actually happened.
The media's mixing working class human behaviour with behind closed doors stated to have happened decisions, aids believing decisions were actually made

Because human behaviour is an easily criticised pass time behaviour. Shifting from retired political figure to another political figure prompts fast judgements.

Media shifting from person to person, hurrying ideas, placing famous people stating irrelevant statements in story scenes, I state is an intentional tactic that allows viewers to believe narrators statements to be true. Because everything is hurried, memories are difficult formulate future and present comparisons.

Paul Keating said, “I said... Really... You'd have to be a Mug to fall for that story”.

Starting with “2008 Great Recession” reminder, going back to Bob Menzies as an early base line comparison.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loans_Affair

Whitlam early 1970s loans scandal leading to federal elections, provides propaganda that money is not invented out of nothing and democracy is real. Distraction from people's loss on savings banked cash value distracts people from turning money into property assets. Investment company promises may also be losing value.

This documentary is the blame game: 2% unemployment 1950s and 60s; US printing money to finance the Vietnam War, causing 1970s inflation; 1970s P76 example of limited competition, bad manufacturing; Union involvement in increased inflation; lowering trade tariffs; floating the dollar; late 1980s entrepreneurial development Allan Bond and Christopher Skase.

In all the words in the documentary spoken, no mention of: interest rates during the 1970s were equal in inflation; before 1977, property valuations were flat, allowing property investment to be not thought of as a good hedge on 10% inflation; 1980s extreme up and down interest rates are not mentioned.
There is no mention of the many working class investors that lost accumulated wealth chasing the dream of home ownership during all the 1980s and Keating's early 1990s.
There is no mention of the 1980s Sydney and other cities high rise office building development boom which with the 1987 crash excuse Paul Keating stating “we don't want to go into a 1930s depression”, turned into low interest rates investment boom, barely mentioning Christopher Skase's name.
Ending in Paul Keating's “this is the recession we had to have”.

The documentary is an excuse, blame it on democratically elected (some people chosen from a working class) party leader politicians guiding leavers to allow market forces to provide employment and paper share market investments.

Could say that the 2014 copyright production is setting up excuses for more recent end of a mining boom, prop-up the economy, Sydney property boom.

My idea is that stable periods of building development, ends with a two year boom period of investment speculation, ending in crashes. Speculative gamblers, feeling investment increased wealth to get rich, often ends in poverty for many investors. “Return to Adam” end of time.

In a working class education, educated not to think. A long period of development has memories of knowing what to do constantly reinforced. Constant media warnings of bubble crashes that show little slow downside evidence in economic transparency figures, creates no reasons to change behaviours. In any finance news media, good news bad news stories prevents action from taking place.

Prime time television renovation property programs has home investment financed by low mortgage rates, being a spare time from employment to increase wealth.
A crash can come not from interest rates going up, a crash can come by property valuations going down after property boom passes unsustainable peek valuations.
If everyone is believing a need to drive economic growth with a boom of some order, than no known boom begins a slow downturn leading to: higher unemployment; lower demand for property investments; leading to low property auction sale turnovers; increased supply of rent property choices, lowering rent contracts, lowering rent property valuations; lowering property valuations.

Documentary narrator says, “we don't want another crack up”.

I state the whole capitalist system is to encourage people to work exhausting labours to increase productivity during expansion periods. Workers taking advantage of reliable employment to increase chances of long term survival and comfort using accumulated money tokens and or asset investments.

Unfortunately the promise of wealth, to buy the dreams people want, giving purpose to exhausting work, is not always obtainable by everyone believing wealth can be obtained. I believe only a limited number of people out of the many workers trying to obtain wealth will be allowed to own their dreams. I believe many items that wealth can buy very much depends on the availability of items up for sale. Having a percentage of working class: renting; owning property; paying out mortgages, is part of balancing working class rewards system.
Much like buying Lotto tickets in pursuit of dreams of wealth. Chances of actually obtaining wealth through Lotto are slim.

Poorly educated people can't hope to own property while highly educated people will in most instances earn enough to buy luxurious property. Children are easily encouraged by parents to work exhaustingly long hours to obtain grades to buy future dreams.
Populations held in cities competing with each other for limited employment and housing. Most people's earning capacity is consumed buy market forces supply and demand property loan payments or rent obligations.

I also assume because past generations had difficult times, leaders believe each generation must undergo difficult periods. Like school is for most every student: horrible experience; mentally stressful; time consuming; pointless; learning for the sake of learning to obtain marks. Children are being conditioned to continuously work day after day for some long time in the future reward.

In any economic downturn and or crash. Badly educated workers after having lost wealth, go back to work if they have work to continue enduring life.