Before the next federal election, it would be interesting to see a schism unfold in the Liberal Party driven by Malcolm Turnbull.

By this I mean that Malcolm should lead a division in the Liberal Party whereby he draws a moderate-liberal line in the sand and then challenges the neo-conservatives in the party (and in the Nationals) to either put up and shut up or leave the party (I presume they would leave).

I believe that Malcolm has enough support at the moment from moderate, rational conservatives and the right, centre and centre-left of the labor party to run a successful campaign that would enable the moderate Liberals to control the Parliament in their own right. Such a campaign might well reduce the neo-conservatives to a very small rabble in Parliament and reduce the Nationals to an inconsequential cohort (a likely outcome if the Malcolm-led Liberals ran candidates against all sitting Nationals – let’s face it, Malcolm no longer owes the National Party any loyalty since the Ian Macfarlane debacle).

I also think that such a schism would enable Malcolm to be free of the shackles associated with his recent elevation to the liberal leadership i.e. the ultra-conservative policy positions on same-sex marriage and climate change to name a couple. Having the latitude to pursue more moderate and rational policies would only strengthen Malcolm’s position and public appeal.

A schism in the Liberal Party would also be a great backdrop to a double dissolution election. To take the lower and upper houses in one fell swoop – an achievement of Lazarus proportions indeed.

Finally, a schism of this nature might entice me to actually cast a non-donkey vote for the first time since Kevin07. Wouldn’t it be nice to have someone authentic to vote for, for a change?

Trouble is I don't believe "From the Sidelines" is actually coming from the sidelines. That comment comes from right in the middle. I too support Malcolm in some of the minor initiatives - same sex marriage and perhaps even, if he dares euthanasia. But how can anyone actually vote for global warming when there is not the slightest sign of it for the last 15 years. Climate change - yes but we, as humans, did not cause it and there is probably nothing we can do about it, certainly not by paying any taxes to affect it.
Also we wait to see how Malcolm reduces the enormous deficit. This is the really serious problem and even Tony didn't really try. It was a step too far for them so how can Malcolm succeed

Channel Ten during advertising is promoting 6 new episodes of X-Files.
Having remembered watching late 1990s X-Files episodes and an X-Files movie. For those readers too young to have watched X-Files episodes. FBI agents Dana Scully and Fox Mulder are investigating outer space alien existence on earth. And that people in influential government positions are covering up alien existence.

Channel Ten promotion, having Mulder saying “are we truly alone or are we being lied to”. The X in “THE X FILES” screen presentation is shown inside a red circle.

If any evidence needed to argue that television and movie producers were sending media viewers religious messages, X Files provides an excellent argument.

That Radio National 1999 guest speaker I occasionally mention, was informing radio program listeners that “X” is an ancient symbol of death. Nazi Swazi-sticker X, ends turned to one direction, was often seen on banners inside a red circle. Red being the colour of blood, circle symbols representing the circle of life: birth; life; death, back to birth; life; death, in a continued circle. Google “snake biting its own tail”.

By Googling “five wounds of jesus pentagrams” I have read pentagrams were early symbols of Jesus sacrifice. Following 200 years of pentagram usage, a 4 pointed cross became the dominate death symbol. Radio National, 1999 guest stating 'nailing a dead man onto a cross expressed symbolised 4 pointed crosses as a death symbol'.

Roman numerals X equals 10 and V equals 5, 5 being Jesus pentagram point number. God's Ten Commandments rules are difficult not to break, causing god's punishments having believers failing to honour god's Ten Commandments. Symbol “V” has in several television series, story of reptile space aliens invading earth. Long running children's cartoon series “Ben 10” seen on GO Channel.
The reasons why Roman rulers placed X and V as number symbols, used to also add threatening death symbolism into a military Roman culture. Or Roman ruling class Christianity religion adopted Roman numeral symbols. Either way that's my arguments.

Beginning around year 2000, lasting for how long, I don't know, radio announcements that, “many people believe in Jesus second coming, Jesus is coming soon”.

So what's going on, you may ask?

Believe me when I say, regardless what religion promotes Jesus second coming, you don't want Jesus second coming. Yet, knowing what's going on in the media can at the right time be financially rewarding and humorous to understand.

Pope Francis recently stated that: a Genesis creation day is not a literal day; that god doesn't have a magic wand. Both statements with a little bit of thought, people can come to a conclusion that Catholic true ideology are more along the lines of Darwinism.

My formulated beliefs: When parable creation god takes a seventh day of rest, after telling Adam and Eve representing/symbolising mankind, not to eat forbidden fruit, fruit representing knowledge. Humans placing themselves on top of the food chain, humans removing themselves from natural selection balance of nature. Creation god on returning from god's day of rest, god discovers human population growth is out of balance with nature. As creation god banishes Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden. God's return is the St John's Revelations, Jesus breaks the seven seals of a scroll, releasing the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, war. X symbolising Jesus cross... X-Files alien invasion, ruling class hiding the truth, suggests creation god's day of rest return.

Those many recognisable Apocalypse media series programs exampling: Under The Dome; The Last Ship; Sleepy Hollow, and many television: zombie Apocalypse; virus; asteroid Apocalypse/Armageddon, etc. movies are placing subconscious serious ideas into people's memories.

Eventually, similar to year 1999, people drawn to selective media, media spokes people will ask listeners to read last bible chapter St John's Revelations, in order to convince listeners to believe a planned periodic Apocalypse war is about to happen. The bible is often stated as forecasting the future, bible story creators are referred to as profits. As in 1999, the media will be stated as a replacement for the bible. Eventually listeners after hearing about the many death symbols in media: Apocalypse warnings, and many other stated secrets. Listeners will be invited to join the privileged few if after the war ends and listeners are still alive.

SBS one television has recently presented many Sunday evening Jesus and a four part heresy “Inquisition” documentaries. Such well-presented documentaries are turning listeners into Christian religion knowledgeable experts. When listeners are informed of other alternative meaningful ideas, listeners will gain confidence in what they know, setting themselves up for a future confidence sting.

When the sting ends, the Jesus story trumped up heresy execution threats and assassination movie media are used to remind stung people not to inform anyone and not to tell authorities of the sting.

The financial advantage in knowing what's happening is that radio listeners will as in 1999, will be asked to sell personal property in a hurry, before share markets crash to very low levels, allowing selling of property difficult. Advertised properties can be picked up at low prices. That by being aware of the sting, readers may not be drawn into the sting.

My continued arguments suggests this same sell property cheaply in hurry was done in 1620, English Puritan pilgrims, reading James the First bible, moving to James Town, North America. People advertising a soon to come end of time Apocalypse war, were buying from escaping Puritans, cheap developed property. Religion is about Darwinism blame it on god trickery, not fair market prices for fair goods.

A note that “ass” in movie titles, ass is the first 3 letters in assassination. Movie “kick-ass”; “Bad ass” 1 and 2; radio informant will advise that first 3 letters in words have meanings. Dictionary: ass noun asses: 1 quadruped of horse family; 2 stupid person.

Government assassins mentioned in media stories: Persons of Interest; Burn Notice; Jason Bourne movie series; Human Target; Mr and Mrs Smith. Stories easily assumed by threatened people of keeping quiet and behaving themselves assassination threats.

As most people have to believe we live I a media exposing scandalous stories proven democracy, I must be wrong.

Merry X-mas everyone… and please don’t drink too much “XXXX” beer before driving motor vehicles.

This is going from the sublime to the ridiculous!
X-files, schisms, SBS and Government assasinations? We are not in Kansas anymore Toto!

FromTheSidelines, "..might entice me to actually cast a non-donkey vote for the first time since Kevin07"

The donkey vote is high.

Malcolm Turnbull should test the waters on removing compulsory voting.

I think steve101 is having a slightly different conversation - interesting but not really my cup of tea.

Dickybird: I agree that Malcolm has some appeal with the Green's voter base and quiet likely with those voting independent in the Eastern states - icing on the cake.

As for climate change - I am pleased that Malcolm is a believer. The vexed question is what to do about it, if anything. I certainly do not support policy options that put Australia at a competitive disadvantage with other nations. I also do not support tokenism in the initiative response space. If we are to pay to support environmentally better practice then it needs to make a difference.

Onthebeach: I support compulsory voting in Australia. Given our very small population I think it is our civic duty to participate in the election of our governments - everyone gets a say.

My donkey voting in the past few elections should not be interpreted as dissatisfaction with our electoral system, rather a complete dissatisfaction with the leadership and policy platforms of the major parties. Even if we had had voluntary voting from 2007 on-wards, I would still have exercised my right to vote and cast donkey votes.

Please don't use the Donkey vote. This gives too much to chance. Just write "No acceptable candidates" across your voting slip. It gives you much more satisfaction of a job well done !

Pauline is looking more moderate each day.

Pauline is certainly moderate compared to you Runner.

Thankfully, there remains no chance at all of her, or the dreadful policies she muttered, ever seeing the light of a political day again.

Most people are far too intelligent for that...

FromTheSidelines

MT is not going to lead the liberals to become another left whinge party. The last time he tried that he got kicked out.

Serious stories on: financially advised investors; off the plan building development investors; people involved with paying out money for services that weren't and or incorrectly provided; practically any scams reported in detailed news media stories, all investors involved in losing large amounts of money. Most all stories I have heard have no beneficial conclusion to the victims having had lost money.

Even where some government authority orders banks to provide compensation for bad financial advice, does any significant number of investors receive significant compensation in followed up stories.

Not knowing what individual legal professionals would say about chances of obtaining financial compensation. My comment here is to state that such media stories that seem to expose the failure to provide investor protection against: bad asset valuations; bankruptcy; high risk asset investments passed off as minimal risk investments; advisors own financial interests recommendations; investment advice providers seen in the company of and or recommended by respected S&P listed banks.

Selective media programs using around ten minutes of time consumed detailed interviewing victims of large sums of money being lost. Messages in media stories are that pursuing legal avenues will result in falling into a sink hole of disappointment. Recent, legal firm predominately into class action compensation suing, “Slater and Gordon” share price slump on news that Great Briton changed the rules on suing companies, increased ideas that seeking financial compensation is pointless.

The many stories exampling: FIFA president corruption scandals; union officials' miss-spent money scandals, has perpetrators barely suffering any consequences, other than perceived as being embarrassed. Media listeners accumulated assumptions of money being lost, lost money never being recovered stories adds to judgements that pursuing compensation for lost money is fruitless.

My accusation here is such stories are propaganda “don't bother seeking legal redress compensation against bad financial advice and or anything.

My assumption, that far more people have been losing life savings than are reported. Record low bank term deposit interest rates are driving savers into financial advisers increased risky asset investments. Bank customers merely have to complain of low bank interest rates, bank employees guide customers towards advisers.

Past four years, I've received at least 6 land line phone calls from the same sounding man having an Asian accent, stating to be calling from Microsoft in Sydney. The first phone call, wanting my to connect my computer to a phone-line wall socket, without asking me if I had a service provider. I never complied to the scam.

In around 2014, ABC Breakfast television program flagged that telephone scammers claiming to be from Microsoft were known for the last two years were calling all over Australia. Scammers were claiming to have been informed of a virus placed on called person's computer. Asking victims to turn on their computer, being guided to error logs. Scammers claiming harmless coloured yellow triangles are serious warnings that computers needed to be fixed at a cost of $400.

I have a neighbour who informs me, she has paid out $690.00 to correct a bad decision while being connected to the Internet, to allow a pop-up window to convince her, her computer seriously needed to be fixed. She allowed her computer to be scanned and altered. After her using her credit card to pay $500.00 to a stated US company that first scanned her computer. Her description was that she was left in safe mode large icons. Another $190.00 was paid to a local computer repairer to fix the problem.

Why do these same year after year scams continue? My assumption is that media stories that inform people viruses exist, occasionally warn people scams are performed by organised criminals in foreign countries, are allowed because, “I hope you guessed it”, a hidden ruling class and or rich influential people protected from prosecution, are organising scams, reducing consumer spending powers, using Darwin natural selection theory to justify scams.

Mentioning anti-virus, malware protection software, the protection industry is older than what's said to be the oldest industry, prostitution. Generally, the protector is often the cause that needs to be protected against or from.

My argument is: The media doesn't provide enough detailed information either by websites or news print for computer users to be informed what not to do when faced with pop-up adverts wanting to scan users’ computers.

Microsoft's regular security patches, doesn't attempt to block and or advise what needs to be blocked. Any selective software blocking software available is long overdue. No selective block once selective pop-ups appears “block this pop-up” that I know of.

As in my experience, I query to know why the instant a new Microsoft OS computer is connected to the Internet, pop-ups appear informing new computer users that the computer has many faults and needs to be scanned. Scanned results shows many faults that need fixing at a cost of X amount of US dollars.

Many fix it pop-ups having approved Microsoft symbols, wanting money to perform tasks on Microsoft provided OS software, Microsoft doesn't perform for free.
I land line phoned Microsoft's provided phone number in 2013 to ask why my computer was performing badly soon after connecting to the Internet. An Indian sounding male wanted me to download my windows 7 operating system copying image onto his servers for a cost of US$50.00. I refused... he immediately hung up.

Seeking readable advice on Microsoft incorrectly performing OS issues from Microsoft website, can have asked question leading to links that looped me around in circles.

My difficult to prove arguments on closed behind doors democracies are part of a confidence trick to allow bad events to happen to citizens on the pretence that voters are looked after in order to secure votes for the best performance of two political parties.

Not only does school education provide voting adults an ability to believe what they're told. That adults are very reluctant to doubt what's already believed. Adults are reluctant to believe that the above theories of a rich ruling class and or influential “Blacklist” like cabal controlling all persistent scams are probable.

…...........................

The last 2015 episode of The Bolt Report had a guest speaker whom I failed to catch his name. His expertise credentials stated was related to marketing products. When asked why Internet articles are seeing Malcolm Turnbull favourably. The guest speaker concluded “supporters of Malcolm Turnbull feel smugness using supporting words”. Ideas that want to be journalists wanting to be discovered may have been mentioned.

I could easily assume using ideas of where have all the religious protestant ministers and Catholic priests who may have bad children, gone, now that church ministry employment passed on to their children has disappeared. I suggest, most descendants have entered: the media; banking; share markets; corporate management; politics... Jobs for the boys network. Good jobs are found by family associations, who knows who.

Myself, hearing many years ago that Masons in Australia (even if Masons have passed away) look after other Masons children's employment opportunities with easy work management jobs, in hope that other Masons will look after their children with similar intentions.
Ask any person from the Philippines. Good employment opportunities are often found in family work forces. When one family member does something wrong and or steals something, all the family suffers disgrace. Children brought up as a family unit income self-supporting system, children will be conditioned to realise if children are court stealing the family will be branded as untrustworthy employees. This is another way of suppressing wages into subsistence incomes, without increased rebellious marching in the streets, name taking by authorities.

The above is another reason why all the media corruption scandals: union management; FIFA presidents; World Bank board members; the process of going to jail has few people said to have gone to jail. If the few accused corrupt people that have said to have gone to jail, I suggest, aren't actually in jail and or never were in jail. Allowing the media to be believed as corruption watching defenders of democracy, transparency. Convincing people, “We must live in a democracy otherwise we wouldn't hear about corruption scandals”.

Few corporate upper management are accused of being corrupt; why share market manipulation insider trading is rarely ever heard; why everything runs smoothly, so smoothly that to pay for smooth running economies, money credits to pay for a smooth running economy, I believe are invented. All political concerns about government budgets are cutting off people's assumed thoughts from realising money credits are merely invented... “budget in deficit” lies.

Unemployment targets are invented as changing survey method locations rather than using Centrelink unemployment payout figures poses an idea that unemployment figures are invented.
Lies are “the more lies are heard the more lies become truth”. The more story ideas are heard the more story ideas should be thought of as covering up real truths with repeating same ideas lies.

Those people constantly defending democracy, making comments about democracy as though democracy is a given, maybe working part time as part of the media promoting democracy like “another” programmed into belief religion, using: sermons; songs; praying to god, religion.

Labor had a reformation in the 1950's. Liberals need it now given the centralist policies of the Turnbull camp. Bernardi and his ilk would certainly get my support.......but it will not happen, they all want job security over the ideology they measure themselves and identify themselves with.

A very large percentage of the people who support Turnbull around here would never vote Liberal as long as their backside was pointing to the ground. Liberal supporters I know would never vote for a party lead by the insufferable egotistical fool.

If this is similar in many other Liberal held seats, hopefully our new ratbag PM will have a very short tenure. Lets hope so, Oz can not afford any more of the ignoramus. He has already proved himself a lying fool.

If we are going to have a ratbag lefty government, lets go the full distance & elect Labor again. They will probably be so inefficient that they will do less harm than a coalition government led by a lefty.

Sport is very important to most people. I strongly suggest sport is very important to the establishment/ruling class as a dummying distraction alternative from punishing to human brains sensitive to mental stress fears school classroom programming education pretend learning. Mildly mentally stress children preferring to play and or watch simple sports action distractions than long hours of pretend to think education.
Adults spending time watching sports are doing what schooling education allowed children to be stimulated by, which are for many people, medicating traumas, visually stimulating colourful sports actions.

A selection of entertaining sports:

I noticed while the few times I have been watching sports. Some sports seem to be more for entertainment rather than competitive competition.

My conclusions are: professional tennis players are hitting tennis balls so fast and so accurate, I believe really good tennis players have out grown tennis court parameters.
Exampling: if a tennis player is able to return a served ball, a ball returned to a server in most instances should be easy to send back by a tennis ball server as a scored point. Tennis players seem to return tennis balls to each other within reachable distances by tennis rackets. Tennis games become back and forth easily return tennis balls distances to opposing players, in order to keep rallies going. Audiences enjoy and applaud long rallies building up to exciting endings.

Players that have needed to run distances to racket hit returning tennis balls, I often see players returning balls directly to opposing players, instead of sending balls down a sideline or across the court for points score advantage. Because players had to run distances to return tennis balls, recovering from out of middle of court locations, to receive returned tennis balls, to return balls back to opposing players. Out of position players should take opportunities for point scores, yet don't... eventually losing points. Players are returning tennis balls to opposing players to keep rallies going for audiences increased entertainment value.

During my few 1990s television coverage witnessing, long duration five set tennis match finals seem to end within fifteen minutes before programmed news hours commence. Leaving enough time to ceremoniously give out winner and runner up trophies and cheques. I expect it not to happen every years.

Professional tennis players owe their continued success to tennis match organisers and sponsors paying for hotel accommodation, tennis match entry fees while under contract.
I assume many tennis players who have no hope to win matches past first few rounds are competing because losing players are sponsor paid the same money with free accommodation and free travel expenses for the sake of providing audience attendance match watching competitive competition.

Hundreds of want to be professional tennis players competing to be in the first ten world ranking high income earners, may realise their effort to be rich through playing tennis is not worth the effort. Entertaining, long term world number one players are ranked number one because tennis matches are fixed for the publics entertainment ticket drawing and gambling participation enthusiasm.

European professional soccer games having teams possessing soccer balls, opposing defender players are rarely marking team side in possession of ball players that don't have ball possession.
Even when soccer balls are in play close to gaols and gaol keepers, players seem to be spread out, allowing easy passing balls to other players of the same team side. Goal keepers sometimes seen to be unable to grab soccer balls, pushing soccer balls into opposing team players possession. Opposing team scores goals. Goal keeper seen putting on an angry dance. News highlights showing goal keepers obvious mistakes.

The most obvious events seen during a game are when one side of the soccer field's wingers have ball possession, being harassed by defending player. The other side of the field has both team's wingers placed far away from each other. A conclude that players with ball possession can pass balls to each team member with increased success on having defending teams least positioned to steal passing soccer balls, for soccer audiences entertainment value limited times.

Even when losing teams are needing to score many goals to catch up, losing teams are not changing playing tactics to spend more time in winning teams goal area, to score more goals before the games end.

One soccer game has me seeing a side line thrown in ball to a same team player, poorly received by the same team player. Opposing team player seen many metres away hesitated to run towards the player possessing the ball until the player possessing the ball was able to correctly control the soccer ball.

If soccer players were honestly and or truly competitive, more marking and active player participation, would see soccer games being more difficult to understand, fast action, lesser entertaining results.

Red and yellow cards tripping dramas are part of the controversy performance. Soccer games are following crowds limited intellectual capacity. Games are played to entertain crowds, not to decide winning teams.

Games can be fixed to guide high stakes gambling winning results.

If winning was important, players would need to try their best, bodily damaging themselves. Players may have shorter careers. Soccer clubs could become very rich or very poor depending on winning matches and ticket gate turnover. Corruption, damaging opposing players bodies to place players out of games. Spreading cold and flue viruses onto opposing teams days before matches.

Opposing clubs bribing opposing club players to play poorly at selective moments. Criminals bribing players to lose games or reduce final goal score to allow large gambling bets to win money. Contracts to play for different clubs once existing club contracts expire.

When everything is controlled by a single controlling entity, controlling who wins what matches, players are secure in a belief that careers will last longer and will not need to work too hard to maintain themselves as a professional soccer player. Professional players can have long running money earning careers, after realising once excepted into professional league, careers are not going to be cut short because better younger players from lower grade leagues, are at any time replacing players.

Horses are emotionally intelligent animals. Horses can be trained to do limited seemingly intelligent behaviours. Race horses could be trained to run down race tracks at differing speeds... run fast and really run really fast.

Horse races can end races with horse spread far apart from each other. Horse races can end races tightly packed together while crossing the finishing post, horse race organisers don't care who wins photo finish dramas.

Horse races last 50 metres to a finishing post has occasional horses speeding up, quickly passing several horse, has me wondering why a single horse can speed up at the very end of a race while other horses are not taking the hint to speed up as well.

Several horses in horse races often have the same trainer. I have heard a comment in an old British 1950s movie, said that 'betting on the jockey rather than the horse is a better idea'. Jockeys get to decide who wins horse races.

Stuarts inquires and exampling Fine Cotton scandal inquire are part of the propaganda of the divided up into many entities racing industry. Aided by transparency media and democracy looking after citizens interests governments.

The benefit to horses are that race horses aren't forced run at horses above capable of running fast limits.
Horses can be seen directly after races end, still running as though rest periods weren't required.

Some people so emotionally court up with horse racing, buy into a syndicate part ownership of a race horse. Around twenty years ago, I heard of an elderly man who was forced to sell his nicely positioned water front home, due to having had purchased a share in a racing horse syndicate, the horse failed to place earn and or win races. Horse training fees, food, stable shelter and I assume being unable to sell out of the syndicate, his contracted obligation to maintain a healthy horse was legally binding.

I could also formulate ideas that many syndicates after winning races, seen jumping for joy at broadcast television race course meetings, are set up by the establishment' front people. Syndicate horses allowed to win races in order to show that syndicates do win horse races and collect large sums of money. Syndicates not of the establishment rarely (if ever) win races.

I have never heard any television current affairs media stories of syndicated horse owners losing financial wealth and or becoming extremely wealthy from part horse ownership.

To repeat ideas that religion is about trickery, tricking people into parting with money, placed in situations natural selection wanting to be greedy sinful behaviours, punished for sinful behaviours by losing money. Catholic church confessions of sins, placing money in church poor box.

…................

Christmas morning, Vatican ABC television broadcast of the pope performing mass showed a 'head full of hair' baby Jesus in a manger Nativity scene, Jesus in the company of animals' sheep and horned cow.
Jesus said to be god's sacrificial lamb, I believe a meaningful translation, referring back to the old testament, God told Abraham to sacrifice his first born son, Issac. God stopped Abraham at the last moment, replacing the sacrifice with a lamb or ram. Jesus is god's chosen one, Abraham's sacrifice to god, meaningful parable idea. Christian Church ideology.
The pope emphasizing the poverty of Jesus, that Jesus was so poor that Jesus was born in the company of animals, has hidden not very pleasant meanings that few people capable of thinking can conclude.

Even when people like myself bring such ideas to people's attention, most every person doesn't want to know. Even though the few people who acknowledge the idea, fear of learning, thinking about something new, prevents them from inquiring further. Which is why I am often criticising school education as the main cause of bad Homo-Sapien thinking skills.

Having mentioned how soccer game results can be altered, filling out soccer pools numbers. Filled out forms scanned and registered to a news agency location. A computer containing all number selections for unplayed soccer games can spit out a selection of number combinations, team soccer game recommendation win, loss and draw. Myself, Not saying and or have any evidence to say the above idea happens. Yet, I have argued soccer games suspect playing behaviours for entertainments reasons, why not for preventing large pay outs to working class winners.

Australian state Lotto number selection machines seems to me are ideal mechanical methods of introducing of selective numbered balls from the rear of a ball selecting machine. Studio switching cameras' close ups and overall machine images are ideal methods to manipulate numbered balls.
Numbered balls blowing inside a transparent ball, suddenly dropping into a funnel and or ball picking device with balls jamming, messing up the ball grabbing process. For a machine to select each numbered ball every time, 100% no failure rates on grabbing balls, seems impossible.
Magicians are credited with performing allusions. Lotto ball selection machines are an ideal way of preselecting numbered balls in order to prevent working class ticket holders from winning large sums of money.

Ideas and arguments that honest state government officials are overseeing the number picking process, are a joke.

Because believed ideas that few people want to advertise their winnings, there exists little evidence that many people have been winning large sums of money.
Occasionally media news reports that million dollar winners are slow to come forth to claim their winnings, doesn't prove there were any real million dollar winners.
Occasional people seen in other countries, winning record large amounts money doesn't mean such people were real winners. Winners seen on stage can be little more than acting out a performance for the establish to provide some evidence that real multi million dollar winners exist. Winners stating their lives won't change, that they're happy to pay off their children's mortgage loans.

Media transparency: political scandalous distractions; increasing road accident figure concerns; state governments ripping off city public transport replacement ticket, smart card holders; new futuristic cancer cures; etc. is the feel good confidence trick everyone loves to hear, allowing citizens to feel safe and secure that governments are looking after them. If things aren't as perfect as wanted, citizens will hear what's not working correctly.

As no media is pointing fingers at government run gambling. Distractions, government certified school education killing child curiosity, media rolled over ideas programs human behaviours not to doubt that there exists alternative motives.

Bad schooling education is bad because though children spend many hours over many years in schools. Not all children can read during early years of schooling. Many students aren't bothering (due to time limits) to comprehend what's being read. That what's being read is little more knowledgeable than television media stories.

Many teenagers leave school: angry; frustrated; suffering from mental depression; are prone to self-medicating alcoholism; on obtaining money through whatever means, buy to consume drugs of various types; are difficult to train new skills due to teenagers and adults applying years of subconscious mental stress reducing avoidance tactics, avoiding comprehending (thinking) what's learnt due to few items of information are worth comprehending and that increased mental stresses are felt.

When people say that spouses and or selective people “don't listen”. I blame (6 hour days) schooling's early childhood learning through to teenagers last days at school student needs to reduce mental stress using subconscious repression/avoidance tactics. People can't listen for more than a few seconds scanning their brain for compatible ideas, refusing to acknowledge anything that feels fearful.
The media's rolled over limited number of topics limits people's understanding to simple repetitive ideas: murders; political scandals; crime.
Many, I assume most people don't want to feel the torture of understanding unknown ideas. People show their reactions to new arguments by not listening, many people talking over as in blocking out other talkers.
Alcohol and or self-induced endorphins to aid daily mental stress work, used to listen to entertaining humorous comedians and or sitting in drunken groups of comical conversations, in need of laughter distractions.

School education represses real comprehending worth while understandings, so as to allow religious, corporate and government systems to keep populations unaware of: scams; media misdirection; saving money, delaying of spending money; trust and faith in something that looks at big picture ideas at the cost of individual rights.

Allowing people to believe people can win large sums of money, fulfilling people's dreams of freeing themselves from working class slavery, increases faith in believing money is not being scammed out of people's ownership.

Treasure Paul Keating's famous statement, “This is a recession that Australia had to have”.

Afternoon of January 1, 2016. ABC24 television news showed a montage of selective (I assume) archived ABC video footage beginning in 1990.

An ABC reporter walking between what looks to be shelves of boxes, said “the next batch of cabinet documents released by the national archives, covers Paul Keating's first two years as prime minister... a chance for him to give his version of history... Tom Nicholson, ABC news, Canberra”.

As the montage of archived video clips rolled over in order clip-by-clip:
Bob Hawke's labour party wins the 1990 federal election after saying “there is no need to fear a recession in any sense”. “Soon a deep recession took hold”.
“it was the recession that dominate headlines”. “Paul Keating promised a soft landing, but the doll cues lengthened”.
An Iraqi war starts, lasting two weeks. After the war ended Paul Keating's battle with Bob Hawke over when Bob Hawke will stand down from being prime minister.

The ABC archived montage didn't verbally mention 1990-91-92 high interest rates imposed on Australians.

My addition to the above:
Beginning after October 1987 share market crash, resulting in two years of very low 4% mortgage interest rates: property speculative boom; investment products boom; share market steady rise boom, ending suddenly in October 1989 high 17% interest rates to home mortgage holders. High interest rates lasting more then two years.

My argument here is that embarrassing history is selective. My belief in what's important information is the easily arguable two years of low interest rates that lead people to invest in Allan Bond and Christopher Skase investment products. Skase was brought before court proceedings and allowed to leave without handing in his passport. Skase managers to leave the country without authorities stopping him. Skase accused of transferring large sums of money overseas, leaving excuses to why very little money was recovered for investors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qintex

….............

Where or what are these archived Cabernet secrets. All I heard are what 1990s generation were told to believe after late 1989.

Allan Bond was said to have purchased channel 9 for one billion dollars. The then media frequently criticised the transaction. Several transactions similarly criticised as bad transactions, allows Bond Corporation's eventual bankruptcy to be believed. Was it a set-up?

A lesson learnt, could be to avoid any financial investments with people named Allan, Al and Chris. Added history lesson on not wanting to know Alexander the Great; and 2008 U.S. Allan Stanford's four billion dollar losses.

SBS one television evening news montage stated “by 1991 unemployment had jumped to 11% almost double what it is now, and mortgage rates were edging 10%. That prompted one of the most famous quotes in Australian politics”. Paul Keating's “This is a recession that Australia had to have”. Everything else mentioned was no more than a list of rolled over concerns media listeners have been hearing for the past twenty plus years.
I state, the statement “mortgage rates were edging 10%” was intentionally misleading.

ABC News: early morning and afternoon edition montage had no verbally mentioning interest rates, yet did have a very quick flash of a billboard sign stating: Citibank; Mortgage Loans Here; Term Deposit 17%.

Channel 9's afternoon news stated “it was a time when interest rates were nearly 20%”.

Another nine network coverage montage stated “interest rates at 17%”, with no other new news heard.

Ten Eyewitness News mentioned 10.8% unemployment with no interest rate figures mentioned.

My vague memories of 1990-91 interest rates being mentioned to me at the time were, variable mortgage rates peeked at 22%. Rate peeks most probably depending on which Australian bank, numbers were drawn from.

RBA website had columns of monthly mortgage rate percentage figures, going back to early 1950s, spread sheet that could be downloaded. Such an important statistical graph or spread sheet no longer can be found on the RBA website.
http://www.rba.gov.au/statistics/historical-data.html

http://www.loansense.com.au/historical-rates.html

Several years ago, I downloaded an RBA website history of Australian Mortgage rates, I did so because the history was extremely incorrect. No mention of any low rate periods were shown.

My memory suggests, Westpack bank was $10 a share before October 1989. After Interest rates went up, West Pack bank was $2 a share.

Share price speculators would have lost money on margin borrowing on shares.

Generations at the time were well versed by the media to where lost money went. Market forces and federal treasure Paul Keating's sudden imposed increased interest rates, leading to Paul Keating's “lack of hindsight” excuse statement.
Paul Keating's “hindsight” statement I believe would of been believed as a joke by anyone with a sense of what would happen after 12% plus interest rate “spread” increases were suddenly applied.

Twenty five years later, today's generations, are seeming to be informed of the political embarrassing recession and leadership battle history, yet, would be ignorant of the more detailed important speculative investment losses that took place during the entire 1980s. What happened to variable interest rate fluctuations between 1977 to 1995 was far worse then what's happened in the last twenty years.

Occasional news that United States had also raised interest rates in October 1989 creating a US recession.
The Accent of Money series mentioned how during 1990, Brazil suffered from 10% inflation per month.
Japan during 1990, had a Nikki share market crash 40,000 index to 20,000 index. Japanese banks complaining about being on the edge of bankruptcy, propped up by Japanese government stimulation.
I am sure more information could have found that many countries suffered problems around 1990. This being partly my argument to the world being controlled by a limited number of people, world government. That world leaders, including the US president, are merely actresses and actors.
Paul Keating was taking the blame for the 1990 to 1994 recession.

Share market boom, starting in October 1994 (Australian bond rate yields had climbed from 6% in March 1994 to 10% in October 1994, declining, ending in 1998, bonds rate yields at 4%, DOW Jones index peeking at around 11,400 index. Share market increases were said to be due to bond market decreasing yields.

I could assume that the Keating/Hawke behind closed doors, often presented leadership stories are invented to allow political news listeners to formulate ideas that there exists no other behind closed doors unknown real political controlling group committee that decides who gets to play the role of prime minister.

My argument is that when the media so often day after day bring up stories that keep formulated ideas of a single strong man leadership prime minister that suffers from zero anxiety over supposedly Cabernet ministers embarrassing: stupid comments; bad judgements; travel expenses scandals; Parliament Speaker scandals; number of women in parliament Cabernet posts.

Exampling: in one of the last few The Bolt Report programs for 2015, Malcolm Turnbull was seen in an interview suffering from poor presentation, arring and grappling to make poignant statements. Political commentator “The Bolt Report” host exposing Malcolm Turnbull for arring and grappling to make poignant statements in sentences. The Bolt Report host showed edited out Malcolm Turnbull's grappling interview, shortening the interview to show how Malcolm Turnbull should have better expressed the interview. The edited interview created an embarrassing media exposing opportunity, reinforcing propaganda “journalists no fear of repercussions by politicians in power”, to reinforce propaganda ideas that “Australian government is a media exposing transparency democracy”.

Egyptian president blamed for arresting journalists for criticising himself and or Egyptian government, created base line dictatorship comparison to freedom to speak democracy propaganda. Rolled over media news reminding listeners and readers how journalists were held in an Egyptian jail, rolled over media reports of protests against Egyptian government to release journalists from jail, reminders propaganda. Released journalists coming home have reasons to tell their story.
I tend to accuse journalists, If journalists were held in Egyptian jails as an intentional orchestrated propaganda story for reasons mentioned above.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Greste

My idea here is that what's important is “why” events happen, not what “as it happened” archived video clips.

What I find interesting about Paul Keating was that Keating is reported to have left school in sixth class, now referred to as year six.
During a 2015 ABC late night television Keating interview, Keating said as a child he letterbox delivered political pamphlets. I somewhat remember his father had something to do with the Labor party.
Paul Keating said, after leaving school, he studied (something in the line of) politics and economics. He was somewhat entrench in politics from the beginning. Keating was elected into federal parliament aged 25.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Keating

John Howard was also a very young parliamentarian, soon becoming treasurer for Malcolm Fraser's liberal government.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Howard

You have to remember or to have seen 1980s Rubbery Figures. In many video interviews: Bob Hawke; Paul Keating; Andrew Peacock and John Howard made many arring sounds. Rubbery Figures extreme facial character entertainments were visually funny, using arring sounds in Rubbery Figures sentences to increase embarrassing humour.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubbery_Figures
There are several Youtube examples.

Often seen on ABC television comedian Max Gillies dressed himself up in various made up faces. Bob Hawke's arring and then current political news allowed Max Gillies to be a very popular entertainer during the 1980s and maybe early 1990s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Gillies

My point being that politicians faces extreme character: long pointy noses; bushy eyebrows; weak chins; narrow placed eyes; unusual differences, seen are about embarrassing entertainmenhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Gilliests that for most people, prove democracy is real.

It is like a working class that believe democracy is real, don't have the thinking capacity to realise that politicians are chosen for their facial character and voices that can be easily recognised in humorous entertainment and news print cartoons.

I assume, using myself as a single example. I have no need to seek out unintelligent humour in order to Laugh Out Load. I can't believe politicians can be that unintelligent unless unintelligent behaviour is intentional entertainment and mentioned about propaganda.
Merely because politicians allow people to feel intelligent because people feel they understand events, allows democracy to feel truthful.

Classroom students feeling other students embarrassing: student and teacher addressing other student dramas, knowing, as in feeling other students arring and grappling to make poignant statements responses are real. I believe because such dramas at school happened often, such emotionally felt by witnessing students as themselves feeling intelligent for understanding classroom dramas, feeling positive stimulation towards similar embarrassing events, “reporters interviewing politicians” are felt as: students and teachers questioning grappling to respond students, grown adults feel media political dramas are felt as real events.

Children brought up in a society of daily rolled over political news stories' many embarrassing events, compare similarities between school dramas and political embarrassing events, reinforcing hurried responding shallow judgements.
To think, means to rethink positively stimulated felt as intelligent judgements. School education represses students' experiencing individual thought using limited rolled over curriculum and long hours of mental stress student self-induced avoidance tactics.

Any media well spoken speaker, as I say happened in 1999 on Radio National, stating politicians are little more than mere actresses and actors used to entertain common working class people, such speakers' ideas are easily believed by myself.

If you believe you have read some of the mentioned points before, than using “the more you say something, the more that something becomes true” adding more items to enlarge the point of view, are my intentions.

Steve, reality doesn't work like that. Whether or not something is true is unrelated to how many times it has been said.

Unless of course the statement in question is itself about how many times somethng has been said...

Below I am sure will be difficult to believe:

Host of 2015 Miss Universe' Steve Harvey, bungled the announcement on the finals winner of the Miss Universe contest. Steve Harvey bungle reported question, “was the bungle an intentional contest promotion”.
January 6, Soccer player Steven Gerard is mentioned in news reports.
January 6, Simon Reeves narrator of an SBS “Australia with Simon Reeves”, interviewed a man searching for gold with a metal detector, named Steve. Simon Reeves soon after interviewed a man who ran a truck driving school in Western Australia, teaching people how to drive trucks... his name was Steve.

Television: news; sports; finance news; game show guests, to my notice have considerable numbers of males named: Steve; Steven; Stephen, than statistically calculated with other names seen in the media.
Some days, every third guest person's name is Steve, etc.

Aside from the idea that my user-name is Steve101, allowing me to notice other Steve names. My assumed reasons for why so many Steve, etc, names are appearing in the media, is due to that first three letters STE.

I am not totally sure, yet I believe the name is being used to recommend a share company code STE for people to invest in.
Myself having been told by the media some time around 2001, that the first three letters in words have meanings, names where included, and share market codes were mentioned.

Several years ago many short periods of many STE names were heard on visual media. Having noticed for a month the frequency of Steve, etc, share company “Australian Wheat Board” share price was reported by ABC finance news to have suddenly increased by a considerable percentage.
Steve names frequency dropped away. AWB share price dropped back to AWB's previous price. Soon, Steve names became more frequent. A month of frequent Steve names again had AWB share price sudden surge upward shown on ABC finance news. AWB share price dropping back to previous AWB price.

STE isn't AWB you ask? Instructions came with ideas that Pythagoras numerology didn't consider zero as a number, that larger numbers than number nine were to be reduced down to a smaller number.

Pythagoras numerology chart:
http://www.soulnumerology.com/learn_numerology.html

Looking at a Pythagoras numerology chart, letters: a; j; s, line up as 1. letters: b; k; t, line up as 2. etc.
S lines up with A; T lines up with B; E lines up with W. having been told twisting numbers is done.

Having easily worked this out and made comparisons with STE and AWB. I don't trust the establishment people to actually give out share codes recommendations unless it was a confidence trick sting.

The next time a month of frequent Steve names appeared on television programs, I didn't buy any AWB shares.
With that month of Steve names, suddenly “Australian Wheat Board” was accused of being in a scandal with Iraq “food for oil”. AWB share trading was halted and on Googling a share price, the share price was shown fixed on a graph chart at about $2 a share. Future Googles found no comments on what happened to AWB shares.

Since than, fewer numbers of Steve names have appeared up until say July 2015.

My assumption is that the share code STE on the N.Y.S.E. has a constant 5 year upward trend. I have no intentions towards buying STE shares or do I suggest and or recommend anyone to be buying STE shares.

https://au.finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=STE#symbol=STE;range=1y

Below is one of those establishment secrets worth knowing about. There's no monetary value in knowing what I know, even though in 2001 I was told there was a way to earn money using this method of numerology.

My assumption in 2001 was that the establishment was using the numerology to distract similar attacted people from purchasing property, once after 911, very low interest rates were introduced, that I would realise a two years property buying boom was about to start. Establishment, using distraction and increased pentagram (Jesus story; radio “many people believe Jesus is coming this millennium”) threats in the media to stop many people, knowing the threats, from buying property before property prices moved higher.

Below is a website example of how to turn alphabet letters into numbers. Internet Pythagoras Numerology example describes how to convert letters into numbers, then reduce numbers into a single number 1 to 9.

http://www.soulnumerology.com/learn_numerology.html

Using that same formula, two more numbers can be obtained. All three numbers are not to be reduced.

Add together first and second letters numbers of: first three letters in words and single names; all letters in words and single names and complete full names... are reduced to create the first number of the three numbers required.

Add together first and third letters number of: words; single names; full names, provides the second number of the three numbers. AND/OR to obtain separate second numbers: add together first and last letters number of: words; single names; full names, providing the second number of the three numbers.

The third number required is all the letters from first letter through to third selected letter where first three letters are used, and/or first letter through to last letter were chosen, turned to numbers, added up to be reduced, of: words; single name; full name; sentences. As shown in Pythagoras Numerology.

The idea is to use names: first three letters; single names; full names. Comparing numbers with: words' first three letters; full words; formulated short sentences, exampled below.

Three number combinations having no zeros provides many combinations. Twisting numbers is practised.

Example: first three letters of assassin, “ass” equals 223. James Bond 007 name “James” is 223; Jason Bourne: “jas” is 223. “bou” is 852; “kill” is 258. Name “barack” is 349; “lies” is 349.
“Assassination” is 267, John Lennon “John” is 762.
“assassin” is 262; “Jesus” is 622. “frequent violence” is 622. “dying young” is 226; “Saint Pauls” is 226; “Saint Peters” is 222.

“police” is 436; “angel” is 643.
“god” is 428; “military” is 428; “dies early” is 428; “satanical” is 248; “hit man” is 842.

Movie title, “silence of the lambs” is 126. “friend” is 612; “sacrifice” is 261; “Satin” is 261; “wolverine” is 216; “child molesting” is 216. Names: “Watson” is 612; supposed jailed “Robert Hughes” is 612.

Television series Friends, “fri” is 666, the devils number 6, 3 times over.

“Judas” is 421; “hell” is 421; “Easter” is 142. “saint” is 239; “kills” is 239; “death” is 932.

“Adolf Hitler” is 512; “reckless” is 512; “wise” is 512; “intelligent” is 521;

“mur” is 747; “murder” is 747; jumbo jet 747.

“obama” is 875; “Murderous” is 758; “murders” is 758; “Johnny” is 785. Stanley Kubrick movie “The Shinning” Jack Nickleson, breaking down a bathroom door with an axe, famous statement, “guess who, it's Johnny”.

“Malcolm Turnbull” is 579; “inflationary” is 579.

“Sherlock Holmes 22b Baker St” is 937; “private eye” is 739; “tall story” is 397. “Sherlock Holmes 22b Baker Street” is 931; “secrets exposed” is 319; “geek” is 391.

“holmes” is 599; “hopeless” is 599; “wizard” is 599.

STE is 368; AWB is 638.

Spread Sheets are ideal for creating easy calculating, if readers are so determined.

IF(LEN($G7)>(J$5-1),IF(CODE(MID($G7,J$5,1))<(65),"",(LOOKUP(MID($G7,J$5,1),$A$9:$A$34,$B$9:$B$34))),"")

Above is my xls formulation: G7 is the input word or words with spaces removed. LOOKUP looks up a table column of alphabet, resulting in a column of 1 to 9 numbers. If readers are clever, readers can figure out the rest.

Time to revise your meaningless figures, Steve: Sherlock Holmes's house was 221B Baker Street.

Above introduced presented version of Pythagoras numerology, coming from my share market spread sheet:

“David Bowie” is 594; “market stocks down” is 594; “market stocks all week head down” is 594. “dav” is 589; “market downturn” 598; “shocking” is 985; “shares sell off markets falling” is 985.

“Essendon” is 615; “market shares sell off” is 516.

Warnings of share market falling are a week late. David Bowie name may be an intentional lettered stage name to be numbered by people who are aware of the numerology. David Bowie recently released an album. Is David Bowie really dead or his career has ended with a fake death.
Regardless, readers can't trust establishment people.

Suburb names could have been named to letters to suit financial short numerology sentences?

My intentions are to convince how many things are lies. That media are not working class individual worker's best friends. The media is controlled by the establishment for reasons of: entertaining distraction; dummying information, rolling over simple ideas; and misinformation. Getting people to believe ideas that are faked concepts: democracy; finance, replacing once forced upon religion.

The numerology is Not shown by myself to encourage market speculation using numerology systems.

On the Sunday Morning of January 17, 2016. ABC1 television repeated a 2014 copyright, Post World War Two history, entitled “Making Australia Great: Inside Our Longest Boom”.

“Inside Our Longest Boom” may hint that the 2014 and 2015 boom has finally ended. That booms with long periods of busts are the normal long term economic system.

Paul Keating stated, “the post war long wave of growth runs from 1947 to 1974... and the next long wave runs from 1982 to 2007”. Whether his opinion is correct or not. In 1977 stated a post WW2 baby boom generation land and or property buying boom prompted by increasing land values. 1982 was suggested to be the beginning of DOW Jones Industrial share market climb stated by Paul Kangas of the once shown US Nightly Business Report.

This documentary is a must see for anyone whose born in the late 20th century, believing they understand democracy. By the time viewers finish watching this documentary, viewers shouldn't consider that they clearly understand anything. This documentary is more a history of excuses... montage of quick flashed known faces. Hurrying past several memorable ideas.
Many people will be turned off taking any future notice on political history as the presented quickness may resemble school education hurried tasks.
Many people don't care about politics, including myself. Politics are pointless personal go no where events.

The documentary easy idea that “The more economic leavers are adjusted by political party leaders”, the more working class people lose personal wealth.

This documentary shifts between politicians and one entertainer' Frank Sinatra visiting Australia in 1974. What's Frank Sinatra doing in understanding 1970s economy other than mentioning Australian unions, Bob Hawke brokering solutions and or 2008 Global Crises?

Media shifting between retired politicians that sound like they're providing relevant information, information is more like commenting on personal remembered irrelevant events as though narrators historical stated events actually happened.
The media's mixing working class human behaviour with behind closed doors stated to have happened decisions, aids believing decisions were actually made

Because human behaviour is an easily criticised pass time behaviour. Shifting from retired political figure to another political figure prompts fast judgements.

Media shifting from person to person, hurrying ideas, placing famous people stating irrelevant statements in story scenes, I state is an intentional tactic that allows viewers to believe narrators statements to be true. Because everything is hurried, memories are difficult formulate future and present comparisons.

Paul Keating said, “I said... Really... You'd have to be a Mug to fall for that story”.

Starting with “2008 Great Recession” reminder, going back to Bob Menzies as an early base line comparison.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loans_Affair

Whitlam early 1970s loans scandal leading to federal elections, provides propaganda that money is not invented out of nothing and democracy is real. Distraction from people's loss on savings banked cash value distracts people from turning money into property assets. Investment company promises may also be losing value.

This documentary is the blame game: 2% unemployment 1950s and 60s; US printing money to finance the Vietnam War, causing 1970s inflation; 1970s P76 example of limited competition, bad manufacturing; Union involvement in increased inflation; lowering trade tariffs; floating the dollar; late 1980s entrepreneurial development Allan Bond and Christopher Skase.

In all the words in the documentary spoken, no mention of: interest rates during the 1970s were equal in inflation; before 1977, property valuations were flat, allowing property investment to be not thought of as a good hedge on 10% inflation; 1980s extreme up and down interest rates are not mentioned.
There is no mention of the many working class investors that lost accumulated wealth chasing the dream of home ownership during all the 1980s and Keating's early 1990s.
There is no mention of the 1980s Sydney and other cities high rise office building development boom which with the 1987 crash excuse Paul Keating stating “we don't want to go into a 1930s depression”, turned into low interest rates investment boom, barely mentioning Christopher Skase's name.
Ending in Paul Keating's “this is the recession we had to have”.

The documentary is an excuse, blame it on democratically elected (some people chosen from a working class) party leader politicians guiding leavers to allow market forces to provide employment and paper share market investments.

Could say that the 2014 copyright production is setting up excuses for more recent end of a mining boom, prop-up the economy, Sydney property boom.

My idea is that stable periods of building development, ends with a two year boom period of investment speculation, ending in crashes. Speculative gamblers, feeling investment increased wealth to get rich, often ends in poverty for many investors. “Return to Adam” end of time.

In a working class education, educated not to think. A long period of development has memories of knowing what to do constantly reinforced. Constant media warnings of bubble crashes that show little slow downside evidence in economic transparency figures, creates no reasons to change behaviours. In any finance news media, good news bad news stories prevents action from taking place.

Prime time television renovation property programs has home investment financed by low mortgage rates, being a spare time from employment to increase wealth.
A crash can come not from interest rates going up, a crash can come by property valuations going down after property boom passes unsustainable peek valuations.
If everyone is believing a need to drive economic growth with a boom of some order, than no known boom begins a slow downturn leading to: higher unemployment; lower demand for property investments; leading to low property auction sale turnovers; increased supply of rent property choices, lowering rent contracts, lowering rent property valuations; lowering property valuations.

Documentary narrator says, “we don't want another crack up”.

I state the whole capitalist system is to encourage people to work exhausting labours to increase productivity during expansion periods. Workers taking advantage of reliable employment to increase chances of long term survival and comfort using accumulated money tokens and or asset investments.

Unfortunately the promise of wealth, to buy the dreams people want, giving purpose to exhausting work, is not always obtainable by everyone believing wealth can be obtained. I believe only a limited number of people out of the many workers trying to obtain wealth will be allowed to own their dreams. I believe many items that wealth can buy very much depends on the availability of items up for sale. Having a percentage of working class: renting; owning property; paying out mortgages, is part of balancing working class rewards system.
Much like buying Lotto tickets in pursuit of dreams of wealth. Chances of actually obtaining wealth through Lotto are slim.

Poorly educated people can't hope to own property while highly educated people will in most instances earn enough to buy luxurious property. Children are easily encouraged by parents to work exhaustingly long hours to obtain grades to buy future dreams.
Populations held in cities competing with each other for limited employment and housing. Most people's earning capacity is consumed buy market forces supply and demand property loan payments or rent obligations.

I also assume because past generations had difficult times, leaders believe each generation must undergo difficult periods. Like school is for most every student: horrible experience; mentally stressful; time consuming; pointless; learning for the sake of learning to obtain marks. Children are being conditioned to continuously work day after day for some long time in the future reward.

In any economic downturn and or crash. Badly educated workers after having lost wealth, go back to work if they have work to continue enduring life.

Exposing a myth:
looking up Australia's total superannuation nest egg, I came up with:
End of 2015 figure of almost $2 trillion.

I assume most superannuation funds carry and or recommend government bonds as a percentage of investment portfolios. Assuming government bonds are Australian government bonds. Having government bonds in investment portfolios... means governments need to run budget deficits in order to create debt (yielding interest payments) to sell in bond markets.
How can federal governments and or even state governments be so concerned with surpluses, when surpluses should mean there exists no government bonds for markets to invest in?

Than there's an idea that the more people invest in shares on Australia's limited amount of S&P 200 approved shares available to buy. Stock brokers must be inventing shares out of nothing to supply ever increasing demand for shares, including overseas share market investors. As shares require dividend earnings per share, increased earnings must be invented out of thin air.
Borrowing money for Margin Call investors, increases demand for what supposed to be limited numbers of shares.

Superannuation funds reaching $2 trillion as the share market has fallen to around 5,000 index from a peak index of 6,000. that government bond yield returns are extremely low.

Superannuation in January 2013 was stated at $1.4 trillion. In the past 3 years Australian Superannuation funds have increased in value by $600 billion.

I keep trying to point out that lies exist in everything, that everything is a lie.

Is 2016 meant to be a bad year?

January 16, New York Stock Exchange Equity Strategist Sam Stovall appeared on Australian SBS one television finance news, warning “I would characterise the market as vulnerable, vulnerable to a Bear Market”... “the world and the US once again of falling into recession”.

Using Pythagoras reducing numbers down to a single number: 2016, 2 + 0 + 1 + 6 = 9.
Number 9 is a symbol for the devil. 666 Revelations 6 is 9 upside down. 6 + 6 + 6 = 18, 1 + 8 = 9.

Other bad market years:

2007, 2 + 7 = 9, was the year Paul Keating marked as the end of the last economic growth period, 2007 was the year US sub-prime mortgages scandal came to light, causing 2007 and again in 2008 market falls GFC.

1998 was the year ending NYSE and world markets 1994 to 1998 market run-up. Several market IPOs Initial Public Offering also known as floats, AMP was one ipo float.

June 1998 AMP IPO, broker recommendations to “buy at any price”, predicted to start float at $20 a share, investors buying at spiked $34 a share, AMP immediately falling back to $20 a share. John Howard stated an inquiry into AMP float that to my knowledge never happened.
AMP July 2001 a high $21.52 a share, falling to around $5.01 a share by July 2003.

October 1989 was the month Paul Keating gave Australia “this is a recession that Australia had to have”.

1980 was a period of high interest rates caused by US Federal Reserve Bank new interest rate policy to increase interest rates to fight inflation. October 1979, Gold futures peeked sharply at US$800 an oz. High interest rates messed with 1977 to 1979 two years of property investment boom. Gold futures falling back to US$400 an oz.

I know no other years reduced to 9, bad years.

Is there an in the know group of investors?

Also aids a belief that markets are manipulated to suit planned growth periods ending in market crashes.

January 18, 2016 several television channel news programs ran a story on the results of a 300 businesses survey, SBS saying, Nine out of ten bosses are complaining about basic: reading; writing; maths; English communication skills. Other channels on the day exampling waitresses can't correctly take orders. Computer programmers can't correctly perform maths.

My accusations are that education is not about learning skills. Government supervised school education is about working day after day under mentally stressful conditions to condition students to continuously work zombie tasks.

School curriculum forced tasks are rotated daily to aid exhausting child curiosity learning desires. Teachers don't teach and guide individual students problems towards easier solutions, fixing failing learning behaviours.

Children growing into teenagers are baby sitting each other, learning each others bad social behaviours, rather than having responsible adults baby sitting children, guiding child behaviours. Behavioural social skills depends on learning from visual images of social skills from their friends, being that children and teenagers desires to fit in with friendship groups, often keeping conversations dumb so as not to feel anyone is learning something.

Exhausted working parents and after school exhausted children are more into wanting to be left alone to rest. Opportunities to correctly communicate with other family members are more out of necessity, argumentative, than social. I assume many dissatisfaction life style families, building up to family violence. Attempting to solve dissatisfaction with alcohol and or drugs.

A need for restful after work entertainment finds news stories: murders; violence; wars; terrorism; illegal drug arrests, poor social skills examples. Teenagers forced to do dreaded homework.

School students undergo periodic examinations to gage how school students perform. Monday's January 18, stated 300 businesses surveyed, add conclusive evidence that school student education are designed to achieve truck driving zombie skills intelligence work force. Simple sports being most citizens increased desires for pursuing increasing intelligence skilled abilities.

I believe the strategy is to create specialist workers having little choice, in choosing provided available employment. Traumatised by schooling, difficult to train teenager young adults, once having found employment, simple employment tasks are difficult to learn. Employment limited tasks becomes a life long capable skill regardless how limited intelligence is needed to perform chosen employment. Workers become specialists feeling comfortable in doing the same tasks all their lives, even if workers don't enjoy doing work tasks.
My accusation is that many to most HSC capable A to F examination memory prompting graduates are conditioned to have learning disabilities. School leavers hate to learn anything new. Whatever employment is chosen, trying to function limited skilled tasks will feel similar to school pretend mentally stressful learning preparing for examinations traumas.

After students leave school: periods on unemployment benefits; time spent finding desired employment; parent and employment finding centres demands to except any employment; poor skills ability; the longer time spent being unemployed the difficult it is to obtain employment. All add to excepting any employer's offer for wage earning employment. Once employed, few incentives to self-learn new skills to find better wage earning, better conditions employment. The school system, corporate and government employment opportunities mind set has condition hopelessness into workers' desires to climb their way up employment opportunities by conditioning people to be begrudgingly satisfied with what employment workers obtained.
Worker's dissatisfaction for employment are often distracted by: turning work into opportunities of fun; watching simple sports; alcohol consumption; illegal drug taking.

As politicians and education experts aren't going to suggest solutions, I will indulge:**
*many children's television programs are violent and hyperactive, Power Rangers for one. Other children's television programs are plain dumb, providing little thinking inspiration. Cartoon images resembling Pablo Picasso art. Children maybe listening to media without caring to understand what's happening, because nothing is seen to be happening and or nothing resembling real life experiences. Listening without thinking about what's happening has little benefit to developing minds, words become meaningless sounds. Instead of parents guiding children through surroundings, parents place children with little regard for children's program content in front of damaging to developing intelligence television programs.

Children can easily choose not to watch what they don't feel is entertaining to watch, preferring to watch programs more entertaining on other channels.

*the problem with many adults are that childhood emotional reactions drive human behaviour. Mammals brains, especially human brains are emotional self-programming feels good is true, feels bad is false, repressing bad fearful emotions along with associated information.
I say that emotionally driven self-programming should be limited to physical movement. Seeing danger, quickly prompted by emotional fear having seen danger, physically reacting accordingly to danger, fight or flight.
Academic learning should not involve emotional fear and stimulated endorphins rewards self-programming. Information is information. Information shouldn't have fear and or gratification emotional associated attachments. People “shouldn't” believe certain types of information (exampling religion) because desired information allows believers to feel good therefore feeling true. Adults maintaining childhood emotional rewards for believing information forced onto adults when adults were children is psychological child abuse proven by adult behaviour. Child abuse in that most adults believe because by not believing feels wrong due to confusion that by being a child, not believing expressively prescribed information, fears of: being dumb; being dumber than many other children in a classroom; being wrong; being left out; being punished for not understanding or not knowing when asked about a prescribed information. Additional abuse is that forced prescribe information has limited use in daily life. Exampling religion: religion is about not going to hell; not committing sins; about a man nailed to a cross; many saints and sinner stories. I pose that fear of not knowing prescribed information forces beliefs and prompted behavioural thoughts towards believing what children are told by authority through media regardless what information was about. School education uses prescribed information to condition children to believe what they're told, that by believing what's stated and or prompted to memory comparisons, feels rewardingly intelligent.

When someone like myself attempt to convince people that populations are being fooled, few people can endure classroom conditioned prompted feelings of being fooled, of being wrong, of being embarrassed and or have any thinking ability to understand simple complex arguments.
Having said that... my solution is that once children attend school aged 5 and 6 years. At least the first 2 years of schooling should be about puzzles, playing card games; monopoly; correct interaction between children and adults; absolutely no mental stress should be experienced for at least the first 2 years of schooling in order to reduce childhood self-programming fear mental stress repression. Learning behaviours are not to be hated as though children had to condition themselves to stimulate rewarding endorphins (morphine) to medicate forced labours, to win a grades competition. That no over stimulation for achieving tasks correctly and or within set time limits.

As children learn to behave responsibly, brain neuron pathway behaviours pull children into correct performing easy to remember learning behaviours: no ADHD and ADD; I speculate no long term depression. Children will learn faster after experiencing how best to win games of chess for little more emotional stimulating rewards than the satisfaction of playing a good game.

As children of the above learning behaviours become parents of the next generation of children, continuing onto following generations, society achieves the academic ability media prompts people to believe what society should be like, that being that all citizens are academic achievers.

Once the feel good is true, feel bad is false repressing information is no longer within populations behavioural incentive, ruling classes lose maximising persuasive powers of lying as manipulative control of society. Also religious ideology of survival of the fittest fades, and that a assume employment loses needs for large police forces.

Being that school costs money: parents should force their opinions onto governments. School principles / headmasters will merely fog parents off with hurried babble and assurances that children are being schooled to learn how to learn and or other difficult to argue with excuses.

Early this week, a news story on the cost of educating each child to HSC: Private schools mentioned as $5,000,000; Public schools $70,000. for various seasons.

When looking a politicians, there seems to be a family culture of entering politics.

Obtaining upper management government and corporate management employment has much to do with whose family knows what family in the click jobs for the boys, what schools did they go to.

Once a management class is established in government. Rather than allowing upper management children to compete with working class children for good government and corporate management employment. Having control of education systems, sabotaging working class education to ensure working class begrudgingly or not, is satisfied staying working class.

Government and corporate management upper management aren't any more intelligent than working classes if working classes didn't have their education sabotaged by irrelevant information and increasing years of mental stress causing students to dumb themselves down. Adding to dummying, media's influencing hyperactive: children's cartoons; sex; violence; illegal drug usage. Which is allowed once a warning that programs contain: sex scenes; some violence; contains drugs use.

Media commentators on the difference between public schools compared with private schools are that childhood friendships between other students are better. Better being that most other students live in families that are wealthy enough to have mothers not needing to work during the years of children's education. Parents being well informed and intelligent enough to understand about mental stress and what repressing mental stress does to memory and rationalising information. Better schools are not forcing students hurrying behaviours into hyperactive irrational behaviours.

The really good schools have quotas on how many students can enter classes having the most influential parents children forming buddy relationships for future good employment connections. Places in limited numbers of classes schools are reserved for children once children are born by parents in the know.

Media never mention above ideas because such ideas bring focus on ideas that democracy isn't that real as most working class people want democracy to feel real.

People in the know get to play insider trading.

I could suggest the above mentioned media story on the cost of private school verse public school, was meant to down play ideas that there exists a better class of better educated people, that the mentioned news stories seem to add, using several parent interviews, that there wasn't that much difference in the quality between private and public school education.

Exampling school education: if by reading a story, some time later a test was given, asking questions related to the story. Questions asked that contain A to F memory prompting answers. Because the story was read, there must be memories existing in the brain, especially if the story was read directly before the test was given. 1 out of 6 provided answers on being vaguely remembered shouldn't be a problem. If the story was read correctly, all answers should have been answered correctly.
By doing this exercise, is this memory task really called education? My answer is zero learning was obtained.
I would conclude that any correctly functioning human brain would have been able to correctly pick out answers from A to F prompting answers. Any excuses for why such a simple test, that a percentage of answers can't be correctly answered, I state school hurrying: ADD; ADHD; mental stress, was sabotaging human brains, that without hurried schooling, students correctly would have easily completed answering A to F selections.

Other indicators of bad education are that schooling's constant obsession with spelling and simple people stories leading to simple memory scanning. People being good at simple Q&A games, leads to a false sense of security in being intelligent and an “in denial”, “I don't care” behaviour, while sensing they don't know something.

Point being as though I type up these many readings, I realise very few people want to care to read how their sense of achievement though education was misplaced.

Rather than being able to think about my claims of bad education sabotaging real thinking behaviours. Most people scan their memories to find how smart they are for not bothering to care. This is where the idea that “you can't teach old dogs new tricks”. Well, you can teach old dogs new tricks if dogs are rewarded with food bits. Yet you can't reprogram highly emotional educated people after people have undergone 13 years of programming self-esteem narcissism into memories. As soon as memory scans starts feeling: they have gotten; something is wrong, in denial of being wrong sets in.