When someone like myself attempt to convince people that populations are being fooled, few people can endure classroom conditioned prompted feelings of being fooled, of being wrong, of being embarrassed and or have any thinking ability to understand simple complex arguments.
Having said that... my solution is that once children attend school aged 5 and 6 years. At least the first 2 years of schooling should be about puzzles, playing card games; monopoly; correct interaction between children and adults; absolutely no mental stress should be experienced for at least the first 2 years of schooling in order to reduce childhood self-programming fear mental stress repression. Learning behaviours are not to be hated as though children had to condition themselves to stimulate rewarding endorphins (morphine) to medicate forced labours, to win a grades competition. That no over stimulation for achieving tasks correctly and or within set time limits.

As children learn to behave responsibly, brain neuron pathway behaviours pull children into correct performing easy to remember learning behaviours: no ADHD and ADD; I speculate no long term depression. Children will learn faster after experiencing how best to win games of chess for little more emotional stimulating rewards than the satisfaction of playing a good game.

As children of the above learning behaviours become parents of the next generation of children, continuing onto following generations, society achieves the academic ability media prompts people to believe what society should be like, that being that all citizens are academic achievers.

Once the feel good is true, feel bad is false repressing information is no longer within populations behavioural incentive, ruling classes lose maximising persuasive powers of lying as manipulative control of society. Also religious ideology of survival of the fittest fades, and that a assume employment loses needs for large police forces.

Being that school costs money: parents should force their opinions onto governments. School principles / headmasters will merely fog parents off with hurried babble and assurances that children are being schooled to learn how to learn and or other difficult to argue with excuses.

Early this week, a news story on the cost of educating each child to HSC: Private schools mentioned as $5,000,000; Public schools $70,000. for various seasons.

When looking a politicians, there seems to be a family culture of entering politics.

Obtaining upper management government and corporate management employment has much to do with whose family knows what family in the click jobs for the boys, what schools did they go to.

Once a management class is established in government. Rather than allowing upper management children to compete with working class children for good government and corporate management employment. Having control of education systems, sabotaging working class education to ensure working class begrudgingly or not, is satisfied staying working class.

Government and corporate management upper management aren't any more intelligent than working classes if working classes didn't have their education sabotaged by irrelevant information and increasing years of mental stress causing students to dumb themselves down. Adding to dummying, media's influencing hyperactive: children's cartoons; sex; violence; illegal drug usage. Which is allowed once a warning that programs contain: sex scenes; some violence; contains drugs use.

Media commentators on the difference between public schools compared with private schools are that childhood friendships between other students are better. Better being that most other students live in families that are wealthy enough to have mothers not needing to work during the years of children's education. Parents being well informed and intelligent enough to understand about mental stress and what repressing mental stress does to memory and rationalising information. Better schools are not forcing students hurrying behaviours into hyperactive irrational behaviours.

The really good schools have quotas on how many students can enter classes having the most influential parents children forming buddy relationships for future good employment connections. Places in limited numbers of classes schools are reserved for children once children are born by parents in the know.

Media never mention above ideas because such ideas bring focus on ideas that democracy isn't that real as most working class people want democracy to feel real.

People in the know get to play insider trading.

I could suggest the above mentioned media story on the cost of private school verse public school, was meant to down play ideas that there exists a better class of better educated people, that the mentioned news stories seem to add, using several parent interviews, that there wasn't that much difference in the quality between private and public school education.

Exampling school education: if by reading a story, some time later a test was given, asking questions related to the story. Questions asked that contain A to F memory prompting answers. Because the story was read, there must be memories existing in the brain, especially if the story was read directly before the test was given. 1 out of 6 provided answers on being vaguely remembered shouldn't be a problem. If the story was read correctly, all answers should have been answered correctly.
By doing this exercise, is this memory task really called education? My answer is zero learning was obtained.
I would conclude that any correctly functioning human brain would have been able to correctly pick out answers from A to F prompting answers. Any excuses for why such a simple test, that a percentage of answers can't be correctly answered, I state school hurrying: ADD; ADHD; mental stress, was sabotaging human brains, that without hurried schooling, students correctly would have easily completed answering A to F selections.

Other indicators of bad education are that schooling's constant obsession with spelling and simple people stories leading to simple memory scanning. People being good at simple Q&A games, leads to a false sense of security in being intelligent and an “in denial”, “I don't care” behaviour, while sensing they don't know something.

Point being as though I type up these many readings, I realise very few people want to care to read how their sense of achievement though education was misplaced.

Rather than being able to think about my claims of bad education sabotaging real thinking behaviours. Most people scan their memories to find how smart they are for not bothering to care. This is where the idea that “you can't teach old dogs new tricks”. Well, you can teach old dogs new tricks if dogs are rewarded with food bits. Yet you can't reprogram highly emotional educated people after people have undergone 13 years of programming self-esteem narcissism into memories. As soon as memory scans starts feeling: they have gotten; something is wrong, in denial of being wrong sets in.