From my experiences communicating with school educated Australians. My assumptions are 95% of educated Australians feel they can think. School educated children and teenagers were stopped from experiencing thinking behaviours. Schooling education's years of pretend thinking churning curriculum studying, traumatised students' ability to want to think independent thoughts, instead students are programmed to believe what they're told to believe, students pursuing sports stimulated enthusiasm. What happens in sports is felt as brilliant. Sports is the level of intelligence, most school educated Australians inspire to.

I stated in the beginning of the Moon landing reading that few people want to believe “no person has walked on the moon”. With most people who feel they can think, no amount of technical arguments will be excepted that prompt alternative thought to whether humans walked on the moon. The feel good factor self-esteem feel good is true, feel bad is false analogy, fear of being wrong schooling's psychological programming. The bad feeling is wrong, stops people who feel they can think, from ever wanting to change their “no thinking intelligence” judgements.

Schoolings years of quick stimulated classroom conditioned to know a single answers to questions, judged correct, feel good is true educated students, traumatised into students memories, (don't make them think or they'll hate you for it). “Feel they can think” educated Australians are impossible to make think that what they believe true is not true.

I could pose many thinkable ideas that badly educated Australians will quickly reject as true, merely because of how they feel while being told and or reading information that prompts unaccustomed torturous thought, (real thinking). Fear of feeling classroom learning under classroom repressing torturous mental stress, continually being repressed. Feeling smart on escaping and or avoiding learning something new, aids instant judgements of wanting to believe what is already believed.

Can't re-educate the already ADHD and ADD badly educated.

I posed technical arguments to why no person has walked on the moon, replies only had anecdotal hearsay from a person who worked at Parks Dish.

Technical arguments can be passed from person to person and remain good. “I was there” passed person to person relies on the first person's credibility.

An inability to except conspiracies, even a possibility of conspiracies, is evidence of a conspiracy to badly educate children into believing everything populations are told to believe. The idea that refusing to understand technical theories to why no person landed and walked on the moon, aids my convictions that schooling education traumatised populations thinking abilities.

Many talk programs often bring up education, quoting solutions on how to fix school education system with increased money. Increasing money is often quoted, while governments are known to be short of money, is a ploy to stop parents complaints to why they're children are mentally stressed; depressed; confused; increased poor behaviours; acting dumb; smoking; wanting to take illegal drugs to medicate schooling traumas.

Take careful notice if you can:

http://www.9jumpin.com.au/show/the-verdict/videos/4585360158001/

My arguments: “Poor out comes” are intentional to traumatise learning behaviours, simplifying working class behaviours into manual skilled robot labours, machines can't perform. Believing everything state by a trusting media, to be true.

steve101,
The thing about the conspiracy theories about the moon landings never happening is that they all rely on demonstrably false assumptions.

I suggest you read http://www.spaceanswers.com/space-exploration/how-did-lunar-astronauts-survive-the-extreme-temperatures-on-the-moon/ to see the flaw of your own main objection.